Daram Naveena R, Day Malika L, Herr Molly J, Maxwell Rose A, Ozcan Meghan C
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wright State University, 1 Wyoming St, Dayton, OH, 45409, USA.
Boonshoft School of Medicine, Wright State University, Dayton, OH, USA.
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025 Jun 13. doi: 10.1007/s10815-025-03538-x.
As social media grows as a health resource, IVF patients turn to Facebook and Reddit for guidance, while providers share educational content on TikTok and Instagram. This study examines the alignment between patient inquiries and provider content to identify gaps in digital fertility education.
A cross-sectional qualitative analysis collected 50 top patient posts from five largest IVF Facebook and Reddit groups and 50 provider videos from Instagram and TikTok using popular IVF hashtags. Posts and videos were categorized into ten themes, engagement metrics analyzed, and provider content assessed for readability. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests for content distribution and independent t-tests and one-way ANOVA for readability differences (p < 0.05 considered significant).
Significant discrepancies were observed between patient inquiries and provider content. Patients most frequently inquired about medications, diagnostic testing, side effects, and emotional support-topics underrepresented in provider content. Providers disproportionately focused on procedural details (34.09% vs. 6.17%, p < 0.001). Readability analysis showed provider content exceeded the AMA-recommended 6th-grade reading level (range: 7.93-15.29). Despite misalignment, engagement with IVF-related content was high, with millions of views, likes, and comments across platforms.
There is misalignment between what patients ask and what providers discuss on social media. Providers aiming content at patients should address patient priorities both online and in clinical practice while improving readability to enhance digital health literacy. Given the vast reach of social media, fertility specialists should consider establishing a presence to educate and engage with patients effectively.
随着社交媒体作为一种健康资源不断发展,体外受精(IVF)患者转向脸书和红迪网寻求指导,而医疗服务提供者则在抖音和照片墙分享教育内容。本研究考察患者咨询内容与医疗服务提供者所提供内容之间的一致性,以找出数字生育教育方面的差距。
采用横断面定性分析方法,使用热门的体外受精主题标签,从脸书和红迪网五个最大的体外受精群组中收集50篇热门患者帖子,并从照片墙和抖音收集50个医疗服务提供者的视频。帖子和视频被分为十个主题,分析参与度指标,并评估医疗服务提供者所提供内容的可读性。统计分析包括用于内容分布的卡方检验,以及用于可读性差异的独立t检验和单因素方差分析(p < 0.05被视为具有统计学意义)。
在患者咨询内容与医疗服务提供者所提供内容之间观察到显著差异。患者最常询问的是药物、诊断测试、副作用和情感支持等问题,而这些主题在医疗服务提供者所提供的内容中占比不足。医疗服务提供者过多地关注程序细节(34.09%对6.17%,p < 0.001)。可读性分析表明,医疗服务提供者所提供内容超出了美国医学协会推荐的六年级阅读水平(范围:7.93 - 15.29)。尽管存在不一致,但与体外受精相关内容的互动度很高,各平台上有数百万人浏览、点赞和评论。
患者在社交媒体上的提问与医疗服务提供者所讨论的内容之间存在不一致。针对患者提供内容的医疗服务提供者应在在线和临床实践中关注患者的首要问题,同时提高可读性以提升数字健康素养。鉴于社交媒体的广泛影响力,生育专家应考虑入驻,以便有效地对患者进行教育和互动。