van Helvert Milou J L, Selen Luc P J, van Beers Robert J, Medendorp W Pieter
Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Department of Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Neurophysiol. 2025 Jul 1;134(1):171-182. doi: 10.1152/jn.00281.2024. Epub 2025 Jun 14.
Self-motion estimation is thought to depend on sensory information and on sensory predictions derived from motor output. In driving, the inertial motion cues (vestibular and somatosensory cues) can in principle be predicted based on the steering motor commands if an accurate internal model of the steering dynamics is available. Here, we used a closed-loop steering experiment to examine whether participants can build such an internal model of the steering dynamics. Participants steered a motion platform on which they were seated to align their body with a memorized visual target in complete darkness. We varied the gain between the steering wheel angle and the velocity of the motion platform across trials in three different ways: unpredictable (white noise), moderately predictable (random walk), or highly predictable (constant gain). We examined whether participants took the across-trial predictability of the gain into account to control their steering (internal model hypothesis), or whether they simply integrated the inertial feedback over time to estimate their traveled distance (path integration hypothesis). Results show that participants relied on the gain of the previous trial more when it followed a random walk across trials than when it varied unpredictably across trials. Furthermore, on interleaved trials with a large jump in the gain, participants made fast corrective responses, irrespective of gain predictability, showing they also relied on inertial feedback next to predictions. These findings suggest that the brain can construct an internal model of the steering dynamics to predict the inertial sensory consequences in driving and self-motion estimation. We used a closed-loop steering experiment to investigate whether an accurate internal model of the steering dynamics can be learned based on inertial sensory cues. Participants were shown to benefit from partially predictable steering dynamics; they took the across-trial predictability of the steering gain into account to control their steering. This suggests that they can build an internal model to anticipate the inertial reafference in driving and self-motion estimation.
自我运动估计被认为依赖于感官信息以及从运动输出中得出的感官预测。在驾驶过程中,如果有一个准确的转向动力学内部模型,原则上可以根据转向电机指令预测惯性运动线索(前庭和体感线索)。在此,我们采用了一个闭环转向实验来检验参与者是否能够构建这样一个转向动力学内部模型。参与者坐在一个运动平台上进行转向,以便在完全黑暗的环境中将身体与记忆中的视觉目标对齐。我们通过三种不同方式在各次试验中改变方向盘角度与运动平台速度之间的增益:不可预测(白噪声)、适度可预测(随机游走)或高度可预测(恒定增益)。我们研究了参与者是会考虑增益在各次试验中的可预测性来控制他们的转向(内部模型假设),还是仅仅随着时间整合惯性反馈来估计他们行驶的距离(路径积分假设)。结果表明,当增益在各次试验中遵循随机游走时,参与者比增益在各次试验中不可预测地变化时更依赖前一次试验的增益。此外,在增益有大幅跳跃的交错试验中,无论增益的可预测性如何,参与者都会做出快速的纠正反应,这表明他们除了预测之外还依赖惯性反馈。这些发现表明,大脑可以构建一个转向动力学内部模型,以预测驾驶和自我运动估计中的惯性感官后果。我们使用闭环转向实验来研究是否可以基于惯性感官线索学习到一个准确的转向动力学内部模型。结果显示参与者受益于部分可预测的转向动力学;他们会考虑转向增益在各次试验中的可预测性来控制他们的转向。这表明他们可以构建一个内部模型来预测驾驶和自我运动估计中的惯性再传入。