• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Privacy in consumer wearable technologies: a living systematic analysis of data policies across leading manufacturers.消费级可穿戴技术中的隐私:对领先制造商数据政策的动态系统分析
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Jun 14;8(1):363. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01757-1.
2
Data stewardship and curation practices in AI-based genomics and automated microscopy image analysis for high-throughput screening studies: promoting robust and ethical AI applications.基于人工智能的基因组学和用于高通量筛选研究的自动显微镜图像分析中的数据管理与整理实践:推动可靠且符合伦理的人工智能应用。
Hum Genomics. 2025 Feb 23;19(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s40246-025-00716-x.
3
Exploration of Reproductive Health Apps' Data Privacy Policies and the Risks Posed to Users: Qualitative Content Analysis.生殖健康应用程序的数据隐私政策及其对用户构成的风险探究:定性内容分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 5;27:e51517. doi: 10.2196/51517.
4
Privacy, Data Sharing, and Data Security Policies of Women's mHealth Apps: Scoping Review and Content Analysis.女性移动健康应用程序的隐私、数据共享和数据安全政策:范围综述和内容分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 May 6;10(5):e33735. doi: 10.2196/33735.
5
Data Management and Privacy Policy of COVID-19 Contact-Tracing Apps: Systematic Review and Content Analysis.COVID-19 接触者追踪应用的数据管理和隐私政策:系统评价和内容分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Jul 12;10(7):e35195. doi: 10.2196/35195.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
On the Security of Bluetooth Low Energy in Two Consumer Wearable Heart Rate Monitors/Sensing Devices.关于两款消费级可穿戴心率监测器/感测设备中低能耗蓝牙安全性的研究
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jan 27;22(3):988. doi: 10.3390/s22030988.
8
Ethical Implications of User Perceptions of Wearable Devices.可穿戴设备用户感知的伦理问题
Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Feb;24(1):1-28. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9872-8. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
9
Research on Data Security and Privacy Protection of Wearable Equipment in Healthcare.医疗保健中可穿戴设备的数据安全与隐私保护研究
J Healthc Eng. 2021 Feb 5;2021:6656204. doi: 10.1155/2021/6656204. eCollection 2021.
10
User Information Sharing and Hospital Website Privacy Policies.用户信息共享和医院网站隐私政策。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Apr 1;7(4):e245861. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.5861.

引用本文的文献

1
HDRPS+: a new affective pictorial scale applicable to organizational contexts.HDRPS+:一种适用于组织环境的新型情感图片量表。
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 8;16:1498143. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1498143. eCollection 2025.
2
Associations Between Daily Heart Rate Variability and Self-Reported Wellness: A 14-Day Observational Study in Healthy Adults.每日心率变异性与自我报告的健康状况之间的关联:一项针对健康成年人的14天观察性研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Jul 15;25(14):4415. doi: 10.3390/s25144415.

本文引用的文献

1
An Evaluation of the Effect of App-Based Exercise Prescription Using Reinforcement Learning on Satisfaction and Exercise Intensity: Randomized Crossover Trial.基于强化学习的应用程序运动处方对满意度和运动强度影响的评估:随机交叉试验
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Nov 26;12:e49443. doi: 10.2196/49443.
2
Keeping Pace with Wearables: A Living Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews Evaluating the Accuracy of Consumer Wearable Technologies in Health Measurement.紧跟可穿戴设备潮流:系统评价综述的实时更新,评估消费者可穿戴技术在健康测量中的准确性。
Sports Med. 2024 Nov;54(11):2907-2926. doi: 10.1007/s40279-024-02077-2. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
3
Bridging Gaps in Wearable Technology for Exercise and Health Professionals: A Brief Review.弥合运动与健康专业人士可穿戴技术的差距:简要综述
Int J Sports Med. 2024 Dec;45(13):949-957. doi: 10.1055/a-2376-6332. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
4
Breaking down the Digital Fortress: The Unseen Challenges in Healthcare Technology-Lessons Learned from 10 Years of Research.破解数字堡垒:医疗技术中的未知挑战——十年研究的经验教训。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jun 11;24(12):3780. doi: 10.3390/s24123780.
5
Six-Month Pilot Testing of a Digital Health Tool to Support Effective Self-Care in People With Heart Failure: Mixed Methods Study.一项支持心力衰竭患者有效自我护理的数字健康工具的六个月试点测试:混合方法研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Mar 1;8:e52442. doi: 10.2196/52442.
6
Leveraging Machine Learning for Personalized Wearable Biomedical Devices: A Review.利用机器学习实现个性化可穿戴生物医学设备:综述
J Pers Med. 2024 Feb 13;14(2):203. doi: 10.3390/jpm14020203.
7
Ethical and regulatory challenges of AI technologies in healthcare: A narrative review.人工智能技术在医疗保健领域的伦理和监管挑战:一项叙述性综述。
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 15;10(4):e26297. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26297. eCollection 2024 Feb 29.
8
Wearable Devices to Improve Physical Activity and Reduce Sedentary Behaviour: An Umbrella Review.可穿戴设备用于改善身体活动和减少久坐行为:一项综合综述。
Sports Med Open. 2024 Jan 14;10(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s40798-024-00678-9.
9
The Emergence of AI-Based Wearable Sensors for Digital Health Technology: A Review.人工智能可穿戴传感器在数字健康技术中的应用:综述
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Nov 29;23(23):9498. doi: 10.3390/s23239498.
10
CovidRhythm: A Deep Learning Model for Passive Prediction of Covid-19 Using Biobehavioral Rhythms Derived From Wearable Physiological Data.CovidRhythm:一种利用可穿戴生理数据衍生的生物行为节律对新冠肺炎进行被动预测的深度学习模型。
IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol. 2023 Mar 23;4:21-30. doi: 10.1109/OJEMB.2023.3261223. eCollection 2023.

消费级可穿戴技术中的隐私:对领先制造商数据政策的动态系统分析

Privacy in consumer wearable technologies: a living systematic analysis of data policies across leading manufacturers.

作者信息

Doherty Cailbhe, Baldwin Maximus, Lambe Rory, Altini Marco, Caulfield Brian

机构信息

School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

Insight Research Ireland Centre for Data Analytics, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Jun 14;8(1):363. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01757-1.

DOI:10.1038/s41746-025-01757-1
PMID:40517175
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12167361/
Abstract

The widespread adoption of consumer wearable devices has enabled continuous biometric data collection at an unprecedented scale, raising important questions about data privacy, security, and user rights. In this study, we systematically evaluated the privacy policies of 17 leading wearable technology manufacturers using a novel rubric comprising 24 criteria across seven dimensions: transparency, data collection purposes, data minimization, user control and rights, third-party data sharing, data security, and breach notification. High Risk ratings were most frequent for transparency reporting (76%) and vulnerability disclosure (65%), while Low Risk ratings were common for identity policy (94%) and data access (71%). Xiaomi, Wyze, and Huawei had the highest cumulative risk scores, whereas Google, Apple, and Polar ranked lowest. Our findings highlight inconsistencies in data governance across the industry and underscore the need for stronger, sector-specific privacy standards. This living review will track ongoing policy changes and promote accountability in this rapidly evolving domain.

摘要

消费型可穿戴设备的广泛采用使得能够以前所未有的规模持续收集生物特征数据,引发了有关数据隐私、安全和用户权利的重要问题。在本研究中,我们使用一种新颖的评估标准系统地评估了17家领先可穿戴技术制造商的隐私政策,该标准涵盖七个维度的24条标准:透明度、数据收集目的、数据最小化、用户控制与权利、第三方数据共享、数据安全和违规通知。透明度报告(76%)和漏洞披露(65%)的高风险评级最为常见,而身份政策(94%)和数据访问(71%)的低风险评级较为普遍。小米、Wyze和华为的累计风险得分最高,而谷歌、苹果和博能的排名最低。我们的研究结果凸显了整个行业数据治理的不一致性,并强调需要更强有力的、针对特定行业的隐私标准。这篇实时综述将跟踪正在进行的政策变化,并促进这一快速发展领域的问责制。