Vilachã Juliana F, Ul-Haq Farhan, Vandeweyer Geert, Marrink Siewert-Jan
School of Life Sciences & Department of Chemistry, University of WarwickCoventry Campus, Gibbet Hill Campus, CV4 7AL, Coventry CV4 7AL, U.K.
Center of Medical Genetics, Universiteit Antwerpen, Prins Boudewijnlaan 43/6, BE 2659 Edegem, Belgium.
ACS Omega. 2025 May 30;10(22):22837-22846. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.5c00072. eCollection 2025 Jun 10.
The emergence of fusion proteins that express the ROS1 kinase domain has become a promising target in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although earlier kinase inhibitors effectively managed ROS1-positive tumors, the rise of point mutations, particularly those beyond the binding pocket, has challenged the inhibitor efficacy. Notably, mutations at residue F2004, which cause cysteine or valine substitution, exhibit intriguing response profiles to the inhibitors. These mutations respond to small molecules that target the active conformation of the kinase (type I) but resist inhibitors that explore the inactive conformation (type II). Our study generates a ROS1 kinase model and uses molecular dynamics simulations to discern structural differentiators of the inactive conformation. A hydrophobic cluster within the active site, involving DFG residue F2103, demarcates the active conformation. We unveil insights from F2004C/V mutations in the ROS1 kinase domain from both the active and inactive states. Notably, the mutations do not perturb the active conformation, resembling wild-type (WT) ROS1. However, in the inactive conformation, the mutations disrupt the flexibility of DFG residue F2103, stabilizing the hydrophobic cluster. Our results provide a model for the inactive conformation of the elusive ROS1 kinase domain, offering pivotal insights into potential differences from the active conformation. Furthermore, our study of F2004C/V mutants proposes a plausible mechanism underlying the type I or II inhibitor response.
表达ROS1激酶结构域的融合蛋白的出现已成为非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中一个有前景的靶点。尽管早期的激酶抑制剂有效地控制了ROS1阳性肿瘤,但点突变的出现,尤其是那些位于结合口袋之外的突变,对抑制剂的疗效提出了挑战。值得注意的是,F2004位点的突变,导致半胱氨酸或缬氨酸替代,对抑制剂表现出有趣的反应模式。这些突变对靶向激酶活性构象的小分子(I型)有反应,但对探索非活性构象的抑制剂(II型)有抗性。我们的研究生成了一个ROS1激酶模型,并使用分子动力学模拟来识别非活性构象的结构差异因素。活性位点内的一个疏水簇,涉及DFG基序中的F2103残基,划定了活性构象。我们揭示了ROS1激酶结构域中F2004C/V突变在活性和非活性状态下的见解。值得注意的是,这些突变不会扰乱活性构象,类似于野生型(WT)ROS1。然而,在非活性构象中,这些突变破坏了DFG基序中F2103残基的灵活性,稳定了疏水簇。我们的结果为难以捉摸的ROS1激酶结构域的非活性构象提供了一个模型,为与活性构象的潜在差异提供了关键见解。此外,我们对F2004C/V突变体的研究提出了I型或II型抑制剂反应背后的一个合理机制。