Subramanian P S Ganesh, Dai Zhuying, Haratian Saman, Heidarinejad Mohammad, Stephens Brent, Verma Vishal
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, 205 N Mathews Ave, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States.
Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology, 3201 S Dearborn St, Chicago, Illinois 60616, United States.
Environ Sci Technol. 2025 Jul 1;59(25):12797-12811. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5c01696. Epub 2025 Jun 16.
Although people spend nearly 90% of their time indoors, the source-specific oxidative potential (OP) from indoor emissions spanning multiple particle generation mechanisms is largely unknown. Here, we quantify the OP of the PM originating from commonly used indoor sources via three different assays, i.e., dithiothreitol consumption (OP), glutathione consumption (OP), and hydroxyl radical generation (OP). The intrinsic (mass-normalized) OP of several sources (candles, incense, cigarettes, humidifiers using tap water, toasters, and air fryers) were comparable (0.75-1.25×) or exceeded (1-6×) that of typical ambient PM. Emissions from candles in the presence of a wind-draft had the highest OP and OP while OP was highest for cigarette emissions. Elemental carbon determined the OP of PM emitted from sources undergoing incomplete combustion, whereas, for noncombustion sources (water evaporation and heating-based), metals were the important drivers. An exploratory exposure assessment in a hypothetical apartment (volume = 100 m, air change rate = 0.45 h, and penetration coefficient = 0.6) revealed that certain sources (e.g., incense, cigarettes, toasters, and air-fryers) could result in occupants being exposed to higher OP in less than 1 h of indoor operation than that resulting from inhaling typical U.S. ambient PM (8 μg/m) over an entire day. Collectively, these results demonstrate the importance of indoor emissions, emphasizing the need for more comprehensive health impact assessments to assist in the development of policy recommendations aimed at mitigating indoor PM exposure.
尽管人们近90%的时间都在室内度过,但来自多种颗粒物生成机制的室内排放源特定氧化潜力(OP)在很大程度上仍不清楚。在此,我们通过三种不同的分析方法,即二硫苏糖醇消耗(OP)、谷胱甘肽消耗(OP)和羟基自由基生成(OP),对源自常用室内源的细颗粒物的OP进行了量化。几种源(蜡烛、香、香烟、使用自来水的加湿器、烤面包机和空气炸锅)的固有(质量归一化)OP相当(0.75 - 1.25倍)或超过(1 - 6倍)典型环境细颗粒物的OP。有风流时蜡烛的排放具有最高的OP和OP,而香烟排放的OP最高。元素碳决定了不完全燃烧源排放的细颗粒物的OP,而对于非燃烧源(水蒸发和基于加热的),金属是重要驱动因素。在一个假设的公寓(体积 = 100立方米,换气率 = 0.45次/小时,穿透系数 = 0.6)中进行的探索性暴露评估表明,某些源(如香、香烟、烤面包机和空气炸锅)在室内运行不到1小时的情况下,可能导致居住者接触到比吸入典型美国环境细颗粒物(8微克/立方米)一整天所导致的更高的OP。总体而言,这些结果证明了室内排放的重要性,强调需要进行更全面的健康影响评估,以协助制定旨在减轻室内细颗粒物暴露的政策建议。