Arnold Renée J G, Tse Winona, Martin Kimberly, Kuan Renee
Arnold Consultancy & Technology LLC, Miami Beach, FL, USA.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Pharmacoecon Open. 2025 Jun 16. doi: 10.1007/s41669-025-00588-w.
This study aimed to evaluate healthcare utilization, costs, and treatment patterns of Medicare beneficiaries with Parkinson's disease (PD) treated with different carbidopa-levodopa regimens.
A retrospective cohort study was conducted using 100% fee-for-service Medicare research identifiable claims data from 2017 to 2019. The study population included 201,241 Medicare beneficiaries aged 65-90 years with PD who received at least one prescription for a carbidopa-levodopa-containing regimen. Treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and costs were analyzed, stratified by medication regimen containing levodopa and levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD), the latter as a proxy for disease severity.
Immediate release (IR) carbidopa-levodopa was the most common initial prescription (83%). Extended release (ER) formulations had the highest mean daily dose (1140 mg, although the equivalent dose in a non-ER formulation is approximately 570 mg, in line with the other three primary regimens). Treatment persistence and cost generally increased with higher LEDD. Concomitant medication use, particularly dopamine agonists, also increased with higher LEDD. Total 3-year per patient healthcare costs were lower for patients prescribed controlled release (CR) carbidopa-levodopa (US $98,650); compared with US $116,394 for patients prescribed IR carbidopa-levodopa; US $123,650 for those prescribed CR + IR carbidopa-levodopa; and US $125,802 for ER carbidopa-levodopa. Costs tended to increase with higher LEDD, primarily driven by outpatient care and medications.
This study provides comprehensive real-world evidence on carbidopa-levodopa use in Medicare beneficiaries with PD. Findings highlight the need for individualized treatment approaches, considering both symptom control and healthcare costs. Future research should focus on prospective studies to assess long-term outcomes and economic impact of different treatment strategies in PD, considering disease severity and quality of life.
本研究旨在评估接受不同卡比多巴-左旋多巴治疗方案的帕金森病(PD)医疗保险受益人的医疗服务利用情况、费用及治疗模式。
采用2017年至2019年100%按服务收费的医疗保险可识别研究索赔数据进行回顾性队列研究。研究人群包括201,241名年龄在65 - 90岁的患有PD的医疗保险受益人,他们至少接受过一次含卡比多巴-左旋多巴治疗方案的处方。按含左旋多巴的药物治疗方案和左旋多巴等效日剂量(LEDD,后者作为疾病严重程度的替代指标)进行分层,分析治疗模式、医疗资源利用情况及费用。
速释(IR)卡比多巴-左旋多巴是最常见的初始处方(83%)。缓释(ER)制剂的平均日剂量最高(1140毫克,尽管非ER制剂中的等效剂量约为570毫克,与其他三种主要治疗方案一致)。治疗持续性和费用通常随LEDD升高而增加。伴随用药,尤其是多巴胺激动剂,也随LEDD升高而增加。接受控释(CR)卡比多巴-左旋多巴治疗的患者,每位患者3年的总医疗费用较低(98,650美元);相比之下,接受IR卡比多巴-左旋多巴治疗的患者为116,394美元;接受CR + IR卡比多巴-左旋多巴治疗的患者为123,650美元;接受ER卡比多巴-左旋多巴治疗的患者为125,802美元。费用往往随LEDD升高而增加,主要由门诊护理和药物驱动。
本研究为医疗保险受益人中使用卡比多巴-左旋多巴治疗PD提供了全面的真实世界证据。研究结果强调了考虑症状控制和医疗费用的个体化治疗方法的必要性。未来的研究应侧重于前瞻性研究,以评估不同治疗策略对PD患者的长期结局和经济影响,同时考虑疾病严重程度和生活质量。