Schilt-Solberg Marvin A, Blair Lisa M, Kurzer Julie A M J
School of Nursing, University of Michigan, 400 North Ingalls, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5482, United States.
Wayne State University College of Nursing, 5557 Cass Avenue, Detroit, MI 48202, United States.
Addict Behav Rep. 2025 Jan 26;21:100587. doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2025.100587. eCollection 2025 Jun.
OBJECTIVE: This study examines the impact of the intersection of gender, racial/ethnic identity, and sexual orientation among adults on substance use disorders (SUDs) from 2021 to 2022. METHOD: We conducted an analysis of persons (ages 18 and older) who responded to the 2021 and 2022 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH). Logistic regression models were constructed to examine odds of past-year SUDs at the intersection of gender, sexuality, and race/ethnicity. All analyses were design-corrected to enhance population representativeness and generalizability. RESULTS: Prevalence varied by race/ethnicity and sexual orientation across both sexes (total = 83,722). Non-Hispanic multiracial lesbian/gay individuals had the highest prevalence of any SUD in both sexes (46.6 % in women, 52.3 % in men). Bisexual women showed consistently elevated odds of SUD across most racial/ethnic groups (aORs 1.48-2.99) compared to White heterosexual women. Men had higher prevalence of SUD than women (21.1 % compared to 15.0 %, .0001). Only White gay and bisexual men had significantly increased odds for any SUD compared to heterosexual White men (aOR 1.73 and 1.57, respectively). White bisexual men had higher odds of reporting cannabis use disorder (CUD; aOR 1.87). Hispanic men demonstrated lower odds of any SUD or CUD (aORs 0.85 and 0.71, respectively). CONCLUSION: Women demonstrated more pronounced SUD disparities between intersectional identity. While men had higher SUD prevalence overall, few disparities were observed between intersectional identities. To effectively address these disparities and their consequences (e.g., differential minority stress and mental/physical health outcomes), prevention and intervention efforts should prioritize an intersectionality approach.
目的:本研究考察了2021年至2022年成年人中性别、种族/族裔身份和性取向的交叉点对物质使用障碍(SUDs)的影响。 方法:我们对2021年和2022年全国药物使用和健康调查(NSDUH)的受访者(18岁及以上)进行了分析。构建逻辑回归模型,以检验在性别、性取向和种族/族裔交叉点上过去一年患物质使用障碍的几率。所有分析都经过设计校正,以提高人群代表性和普遍性。 结果:两性之间的患病率因种族/族裔和性取向而异(总计 = 83,722)。非西班牙裔多种族女同性恋/男同性恋个体在两性中任何物质使用障碍的患病率最高(女性为46.6%,男性为52.3%)。与白人异性恋女性相比,双性恋女性在大多数种族/族裔群体中患物质使用障碍的几率持续升高(调整后比值比为1.48 - 2.99)。男性物质使用障碍的患病率高于女性(分别为21.1%和15.0%,P = 0.0001)。与异性恋白人男性相比,只有白人男同性恋和双性恋男性患任何物质使用障碍的几率显著增加(调整后比值比分别为1.73和1.57)。白人双性恋男性报告大麻使用障碍(CUD)的几率更高(调整后比值比为1.87)。西班牙裔男性患任何物质使用障碍或大麻使用障碍的几率较低(调整后比值比分别为0.85和0.71)。 结论:女性在交叉身份之间表现出更明显的物质使用障碍差异。虽然男性总体上物质使用障碍患病率较高,但在交叉身份之间观察到的差异较少。为了有效解决这些差异及其后果(例如,不同的少数群体压力和心理/身体健康结果),预防和干预措施应优先采用交叉性方法。