• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

现代化研究与证据共识定义:美国食品药品监督管理局与美国国立卫生研究院的合作

Modernizing Research and Evidence Consensus Definitions: A Food and Drug Administration-National Institutes of Health Collaboration.

作者信息

Rivera Donna R, Cutler Tracy L, McShane Lisa, Meeker-O'Connell Ann, Marston Hilary D, Califf Robert M, Bertagnolli Monica M, Avilés-Santa Larissa, Ayalew Kassa, Bayha Ryan, Chetta Joshua, Concato John, Culp Michelle, Dodd Lori, Facey Natasha, Forshee Richard, Freedman Andrew, Friedman Philipa, Golfinopoulos Elisa, Grandinetti Cheryl, Jarman-Miller Hannah, Jorgenson Lyric, Karesh Alyson, Kline Lydia, Kluetz Paul G, Kraus Stefanie, Lee Jennifer J, Lerro Catherine C, Levenson Mark, Li Jie, Lu Yun, Moore Céline, Ordóñez Anna E, Potter Gail, Prindiville Sheila, Rosenberg Yves, Sarosy Gisele, Shapley Stephanie, Smith Emily R, Talley Anne, Tamburro Robert, Viviano Charles, Yongpravat Charlie

机构信息

US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.

National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2516674. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.16674.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.16674
PMID:40526378
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and National Institutes of Health (NIH) share a mutual interest in facilitating efficient, well-designed clinical studies of drugs, devices, and biological products. Recent advances in science and technology, as well as innovative approaches to research design and methodology, provide opportunities to enhance efficiency in medical product development and improve participant engagement in clinical trials. Recent initiatives across the FDA and NIH focus on evidence modernization approaches. Fostering appropriate use of novel designs and sources of evidence, such as real-world data (RWD) to support marketing authorizations and satisfy postapproval study requirements, may be enhanced by using consensus terminology for innovative study designs.

OBJECTIVE

To facilitate effective communication within the scientific community, FDA and NIH formed an interagency collaborative initiative to define clinical research terms related to innovative study designs, with a focus on studies using RWD, for FDA-regulated medical products or broader research and foster a shared understanding of terms across the clinical research ecosystem.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

The FDA-NIH Modernizing Research and Evidence (MoRE) Glossary Working Group (MGWG) was initiated in April 2023 to evaluate terms inadequately defined within the clinical research community that would benefit from development of a consensus definition. The MGWG conducted a landscape evaluation of common innovative design terminology that may lack clarity or concordance. Subsequently, the MGWG reviewed whether and how existing regulations, guidance, and policies use or define such terms. Following the landscape evaluation, the MGWG engaged in rigorous review to seek consensus definitions. In addition, federal agencies sought public input via a request for information before publishing the included terms and definitions.

FINDINGS

The MGWG developed the MoRE Consensus Definitions, comprising 40 clinical research terms and definitions related to innovative clinical study designs that support scientific, patient, clinical, and regulatory decision-making.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The MoRE Consensus Definitions are intended to facilitate effective communication about clinical research and enable transparency around innovative clinical study designs. This publication makes available the glossary developed through this collaboration and serves as an accessible resource for the clinical research enterprise. Furthermore, as clinical research is continuously evolving, additional efforts may focus on emerging new vocabulary and evolving use of current terms to benefit medical product development.

摘要

重要性

美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)和美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)在促进对药物、器械和生物制品进行高效、设计良好的临床研究方面有着共同利益。科学技术的最新进展以及研究设计和方法的创新方法,为提高医疗产品开发效率和改善临床试验参与者的参与度提供了机会。FDA和NIH近期的举措聚焦于证据现代化方法。通过使用创新研究设计的共识术语,促进对新颖设计和证据来源(如真实世界数据(RWD))的恰当使用,以支持上市许可并满足批准后研究要求,可能会得到加强。

目的

为促进科学界内部的有效沟通,FDA和NIH发起了一项跨部门合作倡议,以定义与创新研究设计相关的临床研究术语,重点是使用RWD的研究,用于FDA监管的医疗产品或更广泛的研究,并促进临床研究生态系统中对术语的共同理解。

证据审查

FDA-NIH研究与证据现代化(MoRE)术语表工作组(MGWG)于2023年4月启动,以评估临床研究界中定义不充分且将受益于制定共识定义的术语。MGWG对可能缺乏清晰度或一致性的常见创新设计术语进行了全景评估。随后,MGWG审查了现有法规、指南和政策是否以及如何使用或定义此类术语。在全景评估之后,MGWG进行了严格审查以寻求共识定义。此外,联邦机构在公布所纳入的术语和定义之前,通过信息请求征求了公众意见。

研究结果

MGWG制定了MoRE共识定义,包括40个与创新临床研究设计相关的临床研究术语和定义,这些设计支持科学、患者、临床和监管决策。

结论与意义

MoRE共识定义旨在促进关于临床研究的有效沟通,并使创新临床研究设计具有透明度。本出版物提供了通过此次合作开发的术语表,可作为临床研究企业的便捷资源。此外,由于临床研究在不断发展,未来可能会有更多努力聚焦于新兴的新词汇以及现有术语的不断演变的用法,以造福医疗产品开发。

相似文献

1
Modernizing Research and Evidence Consensus Definitions: A Food and Drug Administration-National Institutes of Health Collaboration.现代化研究与证据共识定义:美国食品药品监督管理局与美国国立卫生研究院的合作
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2516674. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.16674.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
4
MarkVCID cerebral small vessel consortium: I. Enrollment, clinical, fluid protocols.马克 VCID 脑小血管联盟:一、入组、临床、液体方案。
Alzheimers Dement. 2021 Apr;17(4):704-715. doi: 10.1002/alz.12215. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
5
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
6
Hail Lifestyle Medicine consensus position statement as a medical specialty: Middle Eastern perspective.欢呼将生活方式医学作为一门医学专业的共识立场声明:中东视角。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 20;13:1455871. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1455871. eCollection 2025.
7
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
8
Developing evidence-based guidelines for describing potential benefits and harms within patient information leaflets/sheets (PILs) that inform and do not cause harm (PrinciPILs).制定基于证据的指南,用于在患者信息单页/说明书(PrinciPILs)中描述潜在益处和危害,这些信息单页既能提供信息又不会造成伤害。
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Aug;29(43):1-20. doi: 10.3310/GJJH2402.
9
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
10
Patient Restraint and Seclusion患者约束与隔离

引用本文的文献

1
Trends in the use of validated claims-based algorithms in Japanese post-marketing database studies.日本上市后数据库研究中基于验证后的索赔算法的使用趋势。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Sep 2;16:1642490. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1642490. eCollection 2025.