Johnson Matthew, Akrami Kambez, Crosbie Nicholas D, Goonan Peter, Griffith Merran, Leahy Paul J, Leusch Frederic D L, Mann Reinier M, Neale Peta A, van Dam Rick, van de Merwe Jason P, Wilde Taylor, Finlayson Kimberly
Australian Rivers Institute, School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Southport, Qld 4222, Australia; Environment, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Urrbrae, SA 5064, Australia.
Logan Water, Logan City Council, Logan, QLD 4114, Australia.
Sci Total Environ. 2025 Aug 15;990:179877. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179877. Epub 2025 Jun 16.
Treated effluent from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) contains a diverse array of anthropogenic and natural contaminants. These contaminants have the potential to pose environmental and/or human health risks. While targeted chemical analysis is an indispensable tool for monitoring WWTP discharge, its limited chemical domain highlights the need for complementary methods. Direct toxicity assessment (DTA) using in vivo bioassays is widely used to evaluate the ecological effects and safety of effluent discharge. However, these tests are constrained by ethical considerations, specific species, high costs, low throughput and a focus on limited endpoints, such as mortality, growth and reproduction. As such, DTA does not provide a good representation of the range of sensitivities in an aquatic ecosystem. To address these challenges, in vitro bioassays have emerged as a promising alternative, offering higher sensitivity, broader toxicological coverage, faster testing and improved ethical and operational efficiency. This study investigated the potential of in vitro bioassays as a complementary approach to traditional DTA for monitoring WWTP effluent of differing treatment levels. Primary treated effluent was typically most toxic to bacteria and contained elevated levels of endocrine active compounds. WWTPs with tertiary treatment that have a combination of disinfection processes (chlorine, ozone and UV) were typically found to induce low genotoxicity. Effluent from all WWTPs induced moderate to strong aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) activity along with potential nutrient-induced algal growth. A strong correlation was observed between the in vivo DTA sea urchin fertilisation test and the in vitro ERα GeneBLAzer bioassay. Of the wide range of endpoints evaluated, toxicity to bacteria, algal photosynthesis inhibition and growth, estrogenic activity and genotoxicity provided the most sensitive and relevant results. These assays have the potential to be incorporated into regulatory frameworks to supplement and screen for toxicological effects that require further investigation.
污水处理厂(WWTPs)的处理后废水含有各种各样的人为和天然污染物。这些污染物有可能带来环境和/或人类健康风险。虽然靶向化学分析是监测污水处理厂排放的不可或缺的工具,但其有限的化学领域凸显了补充方法的必要性。使用体内生物测定的直接毒性评估(DTA)被广泛用于评估废水排放的生态影响和安全性。然而,这些测试受到伦理考量、特定物种、高成本、低通量以及关注有限终点(如死亡率、生长和繁殖)的限制。因此,DTA不能很好地代表水生生态系统中的敏感性范围。为应对这些挑战,体外生物测定已成为一种有前景的替代方法,具有更高的灵敏度、更广泛的毒理学覆盖范围、更快的测试速度以及更高的伦理和操作效率。本研究调查了体外生物测定作为传统DTA的补充方法用于监测不同处理水平的污水处理厂废水的潜力。初级处理后的废水通常对细菌毒性最大,且含有较高水平的内分泌活性化合物。具有消毒工艺(氯、臭氧和紫外线)组合的三级处理污水处理厂通常被发现诱导低遗传毒性。所有污水处理厂的废水均诱导中度至强烈的芳烃受体(AhR)活性以及潜在的营养物质诱导的藻类生长。在体内DTA海胆受精试验和体外ERα GeneBLAzer生物测定之间观察到强烈的相关性。在所评估的广泛终点中,对细菌的毒性、藻类光合作用抑制和生长、雌激素活性以及遗传毒性提供了最敏感和相关的结果。这些测定有可能被纳入监管框架,以补充和筛选需要进一步调查的毒理学效应。