Choi Hyeon-Kyu, Lee Sang-Hyun, Lee Jin-Hyun, Choi Sooil, Park Sukhee, Lim Young Su, Kim Hye-Jung, Kim Young Il, Park Tae-Yong
Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion Medicine, Daejeon University Daejeon Korean Medicine Hospital, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Seonwoon Korean Medicine Hospital, Jinju, Gyeongnam, Republic of Korea.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jun 13;104(24):e42771. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042771.
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of combining acupotomy with nerve block therapy (NBT) for cervical radiculopathy (CR) compared to NBT alone.
A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the combined use of acupotomy and NBT for CR. Studies were assessed for risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. Data were synthesized through meta-analysis where applicable.
Four RCTs with a total of 540 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that the combination of acupotomy and NBT significantly improved the total effective rate compared to NBT alone (risk ratio 1.16, 95% confidence interval 1.08-1.24, P < .0001). However, no significant pain reduction was observed based on the pain visual analog scale (SMD - 2.55, 95% confidence interval -5.32 to 0.22, P = .07), and there was substantial heterogeneity among the included studies (I² = 99%). The overall risk of bias was high, and safety data were limited, with only one study reporting adverse events.
The findings suggest that acupotomy combined with NBT may enhance treatment effectiveness for CR, particularly in terms of overall therapeutic response. However, due to the high risk of bias, study heterogeneity, and insufficient safety reporting, further well-designed, large-scale RCTs with long-term follow-ups are needed to establish robust clinical evidence.
本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估针刀联合神经阻滞疗法(NBT)治疗神经根型颈椎病(CR)相较于单纯NBT的有效性和安全性。
在多个数据库进行全面检索,以识别研究针刀与NBT联合治疗CR的随机对照试验(RCT)。使用Cochrane偏倚风险2工具评估研究的偏倚风险。在适用的情况下,通过荟萃分析对数据进行综合。
纳入4项RCT,共540例患者。荟萃分析表明,与单纯NBT相比,针刀联合NBT显著提高了总有效率(风险比1.16,95%置信区间1.08 - 1.24,P <.0001)。然而,基于疼痛视觉模拟量表未观察到显著的疼痛减轻(标准化均数差 - 2.55,95%置信区间 - 5.32至0.22,P = 0.07),且纳入研究间存在显著异质性(I² = 99%)。总体偏倚风险较高,安全性数据有限,仅有一项研究报告了不良事件。
研究结果表明,针刀联合NBT可能提高CR的治疗效果,尤其是在总体治疗反应方面。然而,由于偏倚风险高、研究异质性以及安全性报告不足,需要进一步进行设计良好、大规模且长期随访的RCT以建立有力的临床证据。