Huang Tao, Chen Lijuan, Liu Xiaoyi, Wang Ke, Shu Weiwei, Jiang Lei, Bai Linfu, Hu Wenhui, Ma Mengyi, Duan Jun
Department of Emergency, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2025 Jan-Dec;19:17534666251347757. doi: 10.1177/17534666251347757. Epub 2025 Jun 18.
Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is frequently employed for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, yet optimal intubation timing for high-risk NIV failure patients remains uncertain.
To investigate mortality outcomes associated with early versus late intubation in high-risk NIV failure patients.
Secondary analysis of a multicenter observational cohort study.
Patients with high NIV failure risk (updated HACOR score ⩾11 after 1-2 h of NIV) were enrolled. We defined that intubation was needed in these high-risk patients. Intubation occurring within 12 h of NIV initiation was classified as early intubation, while intubation after 12 h was designated as late intubation. Primary outcomes were intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital mortality. In sensitivity analyses, patients who achieved NIV success were categorized into the late-intubation group. Due to baseline imbalances, propensity score matching was performed with covariate adjustment.
Among the study population, 171 patients underwent early intubation and 222 underwent late intubation. Despite greater baseline severity in the early intubation group, ICU mortality (36% vs 58%, < 0.001) and hospital mortality (38% vs 58%, < 0.001) were significantly lower compared to the late-intubation group. In sensitivity analyses, 190 patients with NIV success were included in the late-intubation group, further accentuating the severity disparity between groups. After propensity matching (220 patients: 110 per group), most of the baseline characteristics were comparable. The early intubation group had a 100% intubation rate versus 71% in the late-intubation group, with the latter exhibiting higher mortality (ICU: 46% vs 32%, = 0.052; hospital: 50% vs 34%, = 0.020).
In patients at high risk for NIV failure, early intubation is associated with reduced mortality.
无创通气(NIV)常用于急性低氧性呼吸衰竭,但高风险NIV失败患者的最佳插管时机仍不确定。
探讨高风险NIV失败患者早期插管与晚期插管的死亡率结局。
多中心观察性队列研究的二次分析。
纳入NIV失败风险高的患者(NIV 1-2小时后更新的HACOR评分≥11)。我们确定这些高风险患者需要插管。在NIV开始后12小时内进行的插管被分类为早期插管,而在12小时后进行的插管被指定为晚期插管。主要结局是重症监护病房(ICU)和医院死亡率。在敏感性分析中,NIV成功的患者被归类为晚期插管组。由于基线不平衡,进行了倾向评分匹配并进行协变量调整。
在研究人群中,171例患者接受了早期插管,222例患者接受了晚期插管。尽管早期插管组的基线严重程度更高,但与晚期插管组相比,ICU死亡率(36%对58%,<0.001)和医院死亡率(38%对58%,<0.001)显著更低。在敏感性分析中,190例NIV成功的患者被纳入晚期插管组,进一步加剧了组间的严重程度差异。倾向匹配后(220例患者:每组110例),大多数基线特征具有可比性。早期插管组的插管率为100%,而晚期插管组为71%,后者的死亡率更高(ICU:46%对32%,P=0.052;医院:50%对34%,P=0.020)。
在NIV失败高风险患者中,早期插管与死亡率降低相关。