• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当奥密克戎来袭:病毒亲近程度与亲社会行为之间的倒U形关系。

When Omicron knocks at door: An inverted U-shape relationship between virus proximity and prosocial behavior.

作者信息

Zhang Cheng, Qian Lixian, Yu Wen, Hu Jian-Qiang, Lu Xiongwen

机构信息

School of Management, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.

International Business School Suzhou, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou 215123, China.

出版信息

Fundam Res. 2023 Aug 7;5(3):1233-1245. doi: 10.1016/j.fmre.2023.07.003. eCollection 2025 May.

DOI:10.1016/j.fmre.2023.07.003
PMID:40528956
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12167897/
Abstract

The literature suggests inconsistent evidence regarding the influence of danger on prosocial behavior. We explore this issue through a nationwide survey of 8567 households in China during the COVID-19 Omicron variant outbreak in 2022. In a zero-COVID policy, China chose to quarantine all neighborhoods with viral infections. The almost random presence of infected cases provides an opportunity to examine the relationship between the proximity of danger (i.e. potential Omicron infection) and the prosocial behavior of residents in quarantine zones. For the first time, we find an inverted U-shape relationship: residents exhibit a stronger prosocial behavior when living closer to infected cases in the neighborhood, but this positive effect diminishes when they are too close to each other. Furthermore, such non-linear relationship is salient in residents' interpersonal helping but not in their cooperative behavior. Policymakers should be mindful of the different prosocial responses and target their efforts to help communities navigate quarantine periods more effectively.

摘要

关于危险对亲社会行为的影响,文献给出的证据并不一致。我们通过在2022年新冠病毒奥密克戎变异株疫情期间对中国8567户家庭进行的全国性调查来探究这一问题。在动态清零政策下,中国选择对所有出现病毒感染的小区进行封控。感染病例的近乎随机分布提供了一个机会,来检验危险的接近程度(即潜在的奥密克戎感染)与封控区居民亲社会行为之间的关系。我们首次发现了一种倒U形关系:当居民居住得离小区内的感染病例更近时,他们会表现出更强的亲社会行为,但当彼此距离过近时,这种积极影响就会减弱。此外,这种非线性关系在居民的人际帮助行为中很显著,但在他们的合作行为中则不然。政策制定者应注意到不同的亲社会反应,并针对性地努力,以更有效地帮助社区度过封控期。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76b4/12167897/085f5a8fedae/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76b4/12167897/30c60c8092cc/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76b4/12167897/53391d2463fc/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76b4/12167897/fb057df63da5/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76b4/12167897/2a1617d69071/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76b4/12167897/085f5a8fedae/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76b4/12167897/30c60c8092cc/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76b4/12167897/53391d2463fc/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76b4/12167897/fb057df63da5/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76b4/12167897/2a1617d69071/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76b4/12167897/085f5a8fedae/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
When Omicron knocks at door: An inverted U-shape relationship between virus proximity and prosocial behavior.当奥密克戎来袭:病毒亲近程度与亲社会行为之间的倒U形关系。
Fundam Res. 2023 Aug 7;5(3):1233-1245. doi: 10.1016/j.fmre.2023.07.003. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.用于戒烟的电子烟。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 29;1(1):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub9.
3
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
A Pilot Study of Political Experiences and Barriers to Voting Among Autistic Adults Participating in Online Survey Research in the United States.一项针对参与美国在线调查研究的成年自闭症患者的政治经历和投票障碍的试点研究。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):261-272. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0119. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Assessing the comparative effects of interventions in COPD: a tutorial on network meta-analysis for clinicians.评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病干预措施的比较效果:面向临床医生的网状Meta分析教程
Respir Res. 2024 Dec 21;25(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-03056-x.
6
"Just Ask What Support We Need": Autistic Adults' Feedback on Social Skills Training.“只需询问我们需要什么支持”:成年自闭症患者对社交技能培训的反馈
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):283-292. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0136. eCollection 2025 Jun.
7
Regional analgesia techniques for postoperative pain after breast cancer surgery: a network meta-analysis.乳腺癌手术后疼痛的区域镇痛技术:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 4;6(6):CD014818. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014818.pub2.
8
Caesarean myomectomy in pregnant women with uterine fibroids.患有子宫肌瘤的孕妇行剖宫产肌瘤切除术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 27;1(1):CD016119. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD016119.
9
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对土壤传播蠕虫群体药物给药的看法:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.
10
Prognostic factors for return to work in breast cancer survivors.乳腺癌幸存者恢复工作的预后因素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 May 7;5(5):CD015124. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015124.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Modeling transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron in China.模拟 SARS-CoV-2 奥密克戎在中国的传播。
Nat Med. 2022 Jul;28(7):1468-1475. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01855-7. Epub 2022 May 10.
2
No man is an island: Psychological underpinnings of prosociality in the midst of the COVID-19 outbreak.没有人是一座孤岛:新冠疫情期间亲社会行为的心理基础。
Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Mar;171:110534. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110534. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
3
Intergenerational conflicts of interest and prosocial behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic.
新冠疫情期间的代际利益冲突与亲社会行为
Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Mar;171:110535. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110535. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
4
Dynamic zero COVID policy in the fight against COVID.抗击新冠疫情中的动态清零政策
Lancet Respir Med. 2022 Jun;10(6):e58-e59. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00142-4. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
5
China's 'dynamic zero COVID-19 strategy' will face greater challenges in the future.中国的“动态清零”防疫政策未来将面临更大挑战。 需要说明的是,中国的“动态清零”总方针是以最小的社会成本投入获得最大的社会效果,是我国防控策略的最佳选择,有效快速控制疫情,保障了人民生命健康和经济社会持续稳定发展,并不存在面临更大挑战的情况。
J Infect. 2022 Jul;85(1):e13-e14. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2022.04.025. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
6
To Help or Not to Help? Prosocial Behavior, Its Association With Well-Being, and Predictors of Prosocial Behavior During the Coronavirus Disease Pandemic.帮还是不帮?亲社会行为、其与幸福感的关联以及新冠疫情期间亲社会行为的预测因素
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 11;12:775032. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.775032. eCollection 2021.
7
The effect of social deprivation on the dynamic of SARS-CoV-2 infection in France: a population-based analysis.社会剥夺对法国 SARS-CoV-2 感染动态的影响:基于人群的分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2022 Mar;7(3):e240-e249. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00007-X. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
8
Global monitoring of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic through online surveys sampled from the Facebook user base.通过从 Facebook 用户基础中抽取的在线调查对 COVID-19 大流行的影响进行全球监测。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Dec 21;118(51). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2111455118.
9
How do people support each other in emergencies? A qualitative exploration of altruistic and prosocial behaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic.人们在紧急情况下如何相互支持?对新冠疫情期间利他行为和亲社会行为的质性探索。
Anal Soc Issues Public Policy. 2021 Dec;21(1):1113-1140. doi: 10.1111/asap.12277. Epub 2021 Oct 24.
10
Prosocial behaviours under collective quarantine conditions. A latent class analysis study during the 2020 COVID-19 lockdown in Italy.集体隔离条件下的亲社会行为。意大利2020年新冠疫情封锁期间的潜在类别分析研究。
J Community Appl Soc Psychol. 2022 May-Jun;32(3):490-506. doi: 10.1002/casp.2571. Epub 2021 Sep 18.