Suppr超能文献

PD-L1阴性肺腺癌的一线治疗选择:一项真实世界分析

First-line treatment options for PD-L1-negative lung adenocarcinoma: a real-world analysis.

作者信息

Chen Lijuan, Liu Jie, Lu Junfeng, Hu Xiufeng, An Erjing, Zhao Yanqiu

机构信息

Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.

Henan International Joint Laboratory of Lung Cancer Biology and Therapeutics, Zhengzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2025 Jun 4;15:1533048. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1533048. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the optimal first-line treatment options for programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) negative lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients without common gene-alterations.

METHODS

A total of 159 PD-L1-negative LUAD patients without common gene-alterations were included. Chemotherapy was administered in 44 cases (group A), immunotherapy-chemotherapy combinations in 55 cases (group B) and bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in 60 patients (group C). A head-to-head comparison of the clinical effectiveness and safety for these standard treatment regimens was conducted.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 30.9 months. For the entire cohort, median PFS was 6.67 months [95% CI 5.83-7.51], and median OS was 15.83 months [95% CI 13.46-18.21]. OS was significantly longer in group C versus others (C vs B median 21.6 months [95% CI 17.78-25.42] vs 12.63 months [95% CI 8.14-17.13]; HR 0.59 [95% CI 0.39-0.9], P = 0.01; C vs A median 21.6 months [95% CI 17.78-25.42] vs 13.47 months [95% CI 9.68-17.26], HR 0.47 [95% CI 0.3-0.71], P= 0.001), but no substantial difference was noted between group A and B (HR 0.78 [95% CI 0.51-1.2], P= 0.26). For PFS in pairwise comparison, group B and C were statistically superior to group A (B vs A median 5.6 months [95% CI 4.56-6.64] vs 5.17 months [95% CI 4.09-6.25]; hazard ratio (HR) 0.56 [95% CI 0.37-0.87], P = 0.009; C vs A median 8.57 months [95% CI 7.47-9.66] vs 5.17 months [95% CI 4.09-6.25]; HR 0.43 [95% CI 0.28-0.7], P< 0.001), whereas no significant difference was found between group B and C (HR 0.76 [95% CI 0.51-1.11], P= 0.16). The disease control rate (DCR) improvement was sustained with group C (A vs B vs C: 84.09% vs 83.64% vs 96.67%, respectively (P<0.05)). Multivariate analysis showed that the performance status score and treatment regimen were factors influencing PFS as well as OS. The treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) of grade 3-4 occurred in a similar proportion of patients in each group (P>0.05), and all AEs were manageable without fatal toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy should be prioritized in PD-L1-negative LUAD patients without common driver gene alterations. These findings may facilitate individualized treatment options.

摘要

目的

评估程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)阴性且无常见基因改变的肺腺癌(LUAD)患者的最佳一线治疗方案。

方法

共纳入159例PD-L1阴性且无常见基因改变的LUAD患者。44例患者接受化疗(A组),55例患者接受免疫治疗与化疗联合方案(B组),60例患者接受贝伐单抗联合化疗(C组)。对这些标准治疗方案的临床疗效和安全性进行了直接比较。

结果

中位随访时间为30.9个月。对于整个队列,中位无进展生存期(PFS)为6.67个月[95%置信区间(CI)5.83 - 7.51],中位总生存期(OS)为15.83个月[95%CI 13.46 - 18.21]。C组的OS显著长于其他组(C组与B组相比,中位OS为21.6个月[95%CI 17.78 - 25.42],B组为12.63个月[95%CI 8.14 - 17.13];风险比(HR)0.59[95%CI 0.39 - 0.9],P = 0.01;C组与A组相比,中位OS为21.6个月[95%CI 17.78 - 25.42],A组为13.47个月[95%CI 9.68 - 17.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16d7/12174461/c1c88ef7a371/fonc-15-1533048-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验