Zhang Ting, Liu Ling, Wang Weibin, Ma Yanan, Shi Jianling, Gu Hua
Emergency Center, Gansu Provincial Hospital of TCM Lanzhou 730050, Gansu, China.
Department of Ultrasound, Gansu Provincial Hospital of TCM Lanzhou 730050, Gansu, China.
Am J Transl Res. 2025 May 15;17(5):3961-3970. doi: 10.62347/NYSI3538. eCollection 2025.
To identify independent risk factors for bleeding and propose preventive strategies in acute diquat poisoning (ADP) patients undergoing enhanced blood purification therapy (EBPT).
In this retrospective study, a total of 297 ADP patients (May 2022-April 2024) were categorized into a conventional treatment (n=124) and EBPT (n=173) groups according to their treatment regimens. Clinical data, coagulation/liver function, and bleeding events were compared between the two groups. Logistics regression analysis was applied to identify independent risk factors for bleeding. COX regression model was used to explore the risk factors affecting survival prognosis. Kaplan-Meier method was used to draw survival analysis curve.
The EBPT group had a significantly higher bleeding incidence (45.05% vs. 4.23%, P<0.05), predominantly at puncture sites. Independent bleeding risk factors included puncture frequency, degree of poisoning, prolonged prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), white blood cell count (WBC), elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (P<0.05). Bleeding patients had a higher 28-day mortality rate (50.00% vs. 18.95%, P<0.05) and longer ICU stays. Cox analysis confirmed that ALT, puncture frequency, poisoning severity, and bleeding were significant survival predictors (P<0.05).
EBPT increases bleeding risk in ADP patients, mainly due to procedural factors and organ dysfunction. Optimizing puncture techniques and closely monitoring coagulation and liver function may improve patient outcomes.
确定接受强化血液净化治疗(EBPT)的急性敌草快中毒(ADP)患者出血的独立危险因素,并提出预防策略。
在这项回顾性研究中,根据治疗方案将297例ADP患者(2022年5月至2024年4月)分为传统治疗组(n = 124)和EBPT组(n = 173)。比较两组的临床资料、凝血/肝功能和出血事件。应用逻辑回归分析确定出血的独立危险因素。采用COX回归模型探讨影响生存预后的危险因素。采用Kaplan-Meier法绘制生存分析曲线。
EBPT组出血发生率显著更高(45.05% 对 4.23%,P < 0.05),主要发生在穿刺部位。独立的出血危险因素包括穿刺频率、中毒程度、凝血酶原时间(PT)延长、活化部分凝血活酶时间(APTT)、白细胞计数(WBC)、丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)升高和天冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)升高(P < 0.05)。出血患者的28天死亡率更高(50.00% 对 18.95%,P < 0.05),在重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间更长。Cox分析证实ALT、穿刺频率、中毒严重程度和出血是显著的生存预测因素(P < 0.05)。
EBPT增加了ADP患者的出血风险,主要是由于操作因素和器官功能障碍。优化穿刺技术并密切监测凝血和肝功能可能改善患者预后。