Luo Jian-Sheng, Jiang Wen-Cai, Zhang Xian-Jie, Xiong Chao, Xie Juan, Zhai Wen-Hu
Department of Anesthesiology, Deyang People's Hospital Deyang 618000, Sichuan, China.
Am J Transl Res. 2025 May 15;17(5):3514-3520. doi: 10.62347/LLMS3494. eCollection 2025.
This study assessed the impact of liberalized clear liquid intake on gastric fluid volume (GFV) in patients undergoing painless gastroscopy.
184 patients scheduled for elective sedation gastroscopy underwent 1:1 randomization to a liberal fasting group (n = 92) or a conventional fasting group (n = 92). The liberal protocol permitted clear liquid consumption (≤150 mL/h) until 30 minutes pre-procedure, whereas the conventional group maintained standard preoperative 2-hour fasting. GFV quantification was performed through dual-modality assessment (gastric ultrasound and endoscopic aspiration). The primary endpoint was GFV, with secondary outcomes comprising fasting duration modifications, protocol satisfaction, adverse event incidence, and inter-method agreement.
No significant GFV differences emerged between groups as demonstrated by ultrasound or endoscopy. The liberal group demonstrated substantially shorter fasting durations and higher satisfaction scores, with comparable adverse event rates. Strong inter-method agreement was confirmed.
Liberal fasting achieves equivalent GFV control compared to conventional protocols while optimizing patient comfort, supporting its safe implementation in painless gastroscopy.
本研究评估了放宽清流摄入对无痛胃镜检查患者胃液量(GFV)的影响。
184例计划接受择期镇静胃镜检查的患者按1:1随机分为放宽禁食组(n = 92)和传统禁食组(n = 92)。放宽方案允许在术前30分钟前饮用清流(≤150 mL/h),而传统组维持术前2小时标准禁食。通过双模态评估(胃超声和内镜抽吸)进行GFV定量。主要终点是GFV,次要结果包括禁食时间的改变、方案满意度、不良事件发生率和方法间一致性。
超声或内镜检查显示两组之间GFV无显著差异。放宽组的禁食时间明显缩短,满意度得分更高,不良事件发生率相当。证实了方法间的强一致性。
与传统方案相比,放宽禁食在优化患者舒适度的同时实现了等效的GFV控制,支持其在无痛胃镜检查中的安全实施。