Frykholm Peter, Modiri Ali-Reza, Klaucane Anna, Beck Christiane E, Bouvet Lionel, Isserman Rebecca S, Oshan Vimmi, Stricker Paul A, Quintão Vinícius C, Frithiof Robert
Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Centre for Paediatric Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Centre for Paediatric Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Br J Anaesth. 2025 Jul;135(1):141-147. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2025.03.031. Epub 2025 May 26.
Preoperative fasting regimens designed to minimise the risk of pulmonary aspiration have undergone significant changes, but unequivocal evidence of the safety of reducing clear fluid fasting has been lacking. We compared the risk of pulmonary aspiration in children using three different recommendations for clear fluid fasting.
In this prospective multicentre cohort study, centres with >1000 paediatric anaesthesia cases per year were eligible. Regurgitation events, whether they were transient or led to consequences affecting postoperative care, were reported in detail. All centres also reported the number of anaesthetised children per year and which preoperative fasting regimen they used.
The 31 participating centres contributed a total of 306 900 anaesthetic procedures. The incidence of confirmed pulmonary aspiration was 1.18:10 000 in the sip-til-send group, 0.96:10 000 in the ≥1 h group, and 1.83:10 000 in the control group. There was no mortality as a result of aspiration. The 95% confidence intervals of the differences in confirmed pulmonary aspiration between the control group and the ≥1 h clear fluid fasting and the sip-til-send group were -0.344 to 3.76 and -1.48 to 3.63, respectively. Both sip-til-send and ≥1 h clear fluid fasting were statistically noninferior to ≥2 h clear fluid fasting regarding the incidence of confirmed aspiration, transient regurgitation, and regurgitation leading to escalation of care or intensive care.
The study provides evidence for the safety of reducing preoperative fasting time for clear fluids in children aged <16 yr from 2 h to ≤1 h.
旨在将肺误吸风险降至最低的术前禁食方案已发生显著变化,但一直缺乏明确的证据证明缩短清亮液体禁食时间的安全性。我们比较了儿童采用三种不同清亮液体禁食建议时的肺误吸风险。
在这项前瞻性多中心队列研究中,每年儿科麻醉病例超过1000例的中心符合条件。详细报告反流事件,无论其是短暂性的还是导致影响术后护理的后果。所有中心还报告了每年接受麻醉的儿童数量以及他们使用的术前禁食方案。
31个参与中心共进行了306900例麻醉手术。在“啜饮至麻醉开始”组中,确诊肺误吸的发生率为1.18:10000,在“≥禁食1小时”组中为0.96:10000,在对照组中为1.83:10000。没有因误吸导致死亡。对照组与“≥禁食1小时”清亮液体禁食组和“啜饮至麻醉开始”组之间确诊肺误吸差异的95%置信区间分别为-0.344至3.76和-1.48至3.63。在确诊误吸、短暂反流以及导致护理升级或重症监护的反流发生率方面,“啜饮至麻醉开始”组和“≥禁食1小时”清亮液体禁食组在统计学上均不劣于“≥禁食2小时”清亮液体禁食组。
该研究为将16岁以下儿童术前清亮液体禁食时间从2小时缩短至≤1小时的安全性提供了证据。