• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

短期强化预防服务(日间服务类型C)所带来的长期护理成本差异:对日本老年人的3年随访研究

Difference in long-term care cost obtained with the short-term intensive prevention service (day service type C): A 3-year follow-up study of Japanese older adults.

作者信息

Watanabe Ryota, Saito Masashige, Ide Kazushige, Kondo Katsunori

机构信息

Center for Well-being and Society, Nihon Fukushi University, Nagoya, Japan.

Center for Preventive Medical Sciences, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.

出版信息

Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2025 Aug;25(8):1058-1064. doi: 10.1111/ggi.70102. Epub 2025 Jun 19.

DOI:10.1111/ggi.70102
PMID:40538113
Abstract

AIM

A short-term intensive prevention service, known as day service type C, involves professional intervention for 3 to 6 months to enhance participants' social participation and roles within their communities. This study aimed to evaluate whether implementing short-term intensive prevention services reduces cumulative long-term care (LTC) costs over a 3-year period, compared with the situation for non-participants.

METHODS

This study included older adults aged 65 years and older from Taketa City, Oita Prefecture. A total of 132 individuals participated in short-term intensive prevention services from 2016 to 2019, and the non-participant group comprised 116 individuals identified as eligible for services through a self-administered postal survey in 2019 (both groups at baseline). The non-participant group was selected as part of the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study. Both groups were followed up for 3 years from baseline. The cumulative LTC costs derived from the public claims records served as the dependent variable. The covariates were sex, living situation, income, level of long-term care need, and risk assessment scale. Linear regression analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The participants incurred 241 398 JPY (± 681 335) per person, while the non-participants incurred 1 147 858 JPY (± 1 244 750). The adjusted linear regression showed that the LTC cost for the participants was lower by 495 534 (-848 382 to -142 686) JPY per person than that for those in the non-participation group.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with non-participants, the participants incurred approximately 500 000 JPY less in cumulative LTC costs per person over the subsequent 3 years. The widespread adoption of short-term, intensive prevention services may contribute to the sustainability of LTC insurance systems. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2025; 25: 1058-1064.

摘要

目的

一种名为C型日间服务的短期强化预防服务,涉及3至6个月的专业干预,以提高参与者在其社区内的社会参与度和角色。本研究旨在评估与未参与者的情况相比,实施短期强化预防服务是否能在3年内降低累积长期护理(LTC)成本。

方法

本研究纳入了来自大分县竹田市65岁及以上的老年人。2016年至2019年共有132人参加了短期强化预防服务,未参与组由2019年通过自填式邮政调查确定符合服务条件的116人组成(两组均为基线时)。未参与组是日本老年医学评估研究的一部分。两组均从基线开始随访3年。来自公共理赔记录的累积LTC成本作为因变量。协变量包括性别、生活状况、收入、长期护理需求水平和风险评估量表。进行线性回归分析。

结果

参与者人均产生241398日元(±681335日元),而未参与者人均产生1147858日元(±1244750日元)。调整后的线性回归显示,参与者的LTC成本比未参与组的人均低495534(-848382至-142686)日元。

结论

与未参与者相比,参与者在随后3年中人均累积LTC成本少约500000日元。短期强化预防服务的广泛采用可能有助于长期护理保险系统的可持续性。《老年医学与老年病学国际杂志》2025年;25:1058 - 1064。

相似文献

1
Difference in long-term care cost obtained with the short-term intensive prevention service (day service type C): A 3-year follow-up study of Japanese older adults.短期强化预防服务(日间服务类型C)所带来的长期护理成本差异:对日本老年人的3年随访研究
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2025 Aug;25(8):1058-1064. doi: 10.1111/ggi.70102. Epub 2025 Jun 19.
2
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
3
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
4
Differences in Cumulative Long-Term Care Costs by Dental Visit Pattern Among Japanese Older Adults: The JAGES Cohort Study.日本老年人不同牙科就诊模式的长期护理费用累积差异:JAGES 队列研究。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2024 Sep 1;79(9). doi: 10.1093/gerona/glae194.
5
Outcomes of specialist physiotherapy for functional motor disorder: the Physio4FMD RCT.功能性运动障碍专科物理治疗的效果:Physio4FMD随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul;29(34):1-28. doi: 10.3310/MKAC9495.
6
Urodynamics tests for the diagnosis and management of male bladder outlet obstruction: long-term follow-up of the UPSTREAM non-inferiority RCT.用于男性膀胱出口梗阻诊断和管理的尿动力学检查:UPSTREAM非劣效性随机对照试验的长期随访
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul;29(26):1-57. doi: 10.3310/SLPT4675.
7
Digital augmentation of aftercare for patients with anorexia nervosa: the TRIANGLE RCT and economic evaluation.神经性厌食症患者后期护理的数字化增强:TRIANGLE随机对照试验及经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul;29(31):1-162. doi: 10.3310/ADLS3672.
8
Case management approaches to home support for people with dementia.针对痴呆症患者居家支持的个案管理方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 5;1(1):CD008345. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008345.pub2.
9
Time-limited home-care reablement services for maintaining and improving the functional independence of older adults.限时居家护理康复服务以维持和改善老年人的功能独立性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 11;10(10):CD010825. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010825.pub2.
10
Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿德福韦酯与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a治疗慢性乙型肝炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(28):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-183. doi: 10.3310/hta10280.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of the Incidence of Functional Disability Correlated With Social Participation Among Older Adults in Japan.日本老年人中与社会参与相关的功能残疾发生率比较。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2024 Jun;25(6):104932. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.01.001. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
2
An overview of systems for providing integrated and comprehensive care for older people in Japan.日本为老年人提供综合全面护理的系统概述。
Arch Public Health. 2023 May 4;81(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s13690-023-01076-5.
3
Predictive validity of the modified Kihon Checklist for the incidence of functional disability among older people: A 3-year cohort study from the JAGES.
《简易健康检查量表修订版对老年人功能性残疾发生率的预测效度:来自 JAGES 的一项 3 年队列研究》。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2022 Aug;22(8):667-674. doi: 10.1111/ggi.14439. Epub 2022 Jul 17.
4
Differences in Cumulative Long-Term Care Costs by Community Activities and Employment: A Prospective Follow-Up Study of Older Japanese Adults.社区活动和就业对长期护理费用的累积影响差异:对日本老年成年人的前瞻性随访研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 19;18(10):5414. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105414.
5
Prevention services via public long-term care insurance can be effective among a specific group of older adults in Japan.通过公共长期护理保险提供预防服务可能对日本特定老年群体有效。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 30;21(1):531. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06495-0.
6
A systematic review on implementation of person-centered care interventions for older people in out-of-hospital settings.系统评价:在院外环境中实施以老年人为中心的护理干预措施
Geriatr Nurs. 2021 Jan-Feb;42(1):213-224. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2020.08.004. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
7
The effect of resistance training, detraining and retraining on muscle strength and power, myofibre size, satellite cells and myonuclei in older men.抗阻训练、停训及再训对老年男性肌肉力量和功率、肌纤维大小、卫星细胞和肌细胞核的影响。
Exp Gerontol. 2020 May;133:110860. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2020.110860. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
8
Effects of Reablement on the Independence of Community-Dwelling Older Adults with Mild Disability: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Reablement 对轻度残疾的社区居住老年人独立性的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 17;16(20):3954. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16203954.
9
Development of a risk assessment scale predicting incident functional disability among older people: Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study.预测老年人新发功能性残疾风险评估量表的制定:日本老年评估研究。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2018 Oct;18(10):1433-1438. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13503. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
10
Cost effectiveness of an intervention focused on reducing bathing disability.一项旨在减少沐浴障碍的干预措施的成本效益。
Eur J Ageing. 2016 Nov 28;14(3):233-241. doi: 10.1007/s10433-016-0404-1. eCollection 2017 Sep.