• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国的社会支持:二十年来的分层与获取趋势

Social Support in America: Stratification and Trends in Access over Two Decades.

作者信息

Verdery Ashton M, Campbell Colin

机构信息

The Pennsylvania State University.

East Carolina University.

出版信息

Soc Forces. 2019 Dec;98(2):725-752. Epub 2019 Feb 26.

PMID:40538460
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12178593/
Abstract

Social networks of family and friends are key resources that individuals turn to in times of need. When family and friends can provide assistance, they constitute a form of social capital that individuals may draw on for social support. Although a large body of research has examined the use of social support in its own right and as a predictor or moderator of other outcomes, few studies have explored differentials in access to social support for the general population or how these access levels have changed over time. There are many open questions. Is access to social support broadly distributed in the population or does it differ by demographic subgroups? Have levels of access remained constant? We compare levels of access to social support through both family and friends across population subgroups and describe the changing contours of access to it in the general population. Using repeated cross-sectional measurements that we compile from nearly two decades of surveys conducted as part of the Survey of Income and Program Participation, we expand on a literature that has, to date, focused almost exclusively on the use of social support as a predictor of other outcomes using non-representative data. This article presents, to our knowledge, the first nationally representative study of stratification and trends in access to social support for individuals in the United States.

摘要

家人和朋友的社交网络是个人在需要时求助的关键资源。当家人和朋友能够提供帮助时,他们就构成了一种社会资本形式,个人可以利用这种资本获得社会支持。尽管大量研究已经考察了社会支持本身的使用情况,以及它作为其他结果的预测因素或调节因素的情况,但很少有研究探讨普通人群在获得社会支持方面的差异,或者这些获得水平随时间的变化情况。有许多悬而未决的问题。获得社会支持的机会在人群中是广泛分布的,还是因人口亚群体而异?获得水平是否保持不变?我们比较了不同人群亚组通过家人和朋友获得社会支持的水平,并描述了普通人群中获得社会支持的变化情况。我们利用从近二十年作为收入与项目参与调查一部分进行的调查中汇编的重复横截面测量数据,扩展了迄今为止几乎完全集中于使用非代表性数据将社会支持作为其他结果预测因素的文献。据我们所知,本文首次对美国个人获得社会支持的分层和趋势进行了全国代表性研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e56d/12178593/2fe9ef303efa/nihms-2089255-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e56d/12178593/30fbb4faeae8/nihms-2089255-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e56d/12178593/eb21838bab7a/nihms-2089255-f0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e56d/12178593/ef770c1fcbc5/nihms-2089255-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e56d/12178593/205c99e7176c/nihms-2089255-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e56d/12178593/054ff56cc7d0/nihms-2089255-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e56d/12178593/829628a47ea7/nihms-2089255-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e56d/12178593/2fe9ef303efa/nihms-2089255-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e56d/12178593/30fbb4faeae8/nihms-2089255-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e56d/12178593/eb21838bab7a/nihms-2089255-f0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e56d/12178593/ef770c1fcbc5/nihms-2089255-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e56d/12178593/205c99e7176c/nihms-2089255-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e56d/12178593/054ff56cc7d0/nihms-2089255-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e56d/12178593/829628a47ea7/nihms-2089255-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e56d/12178593/2fe9ef303efa/nihms-2089255-f0005.jpg

相似文献

1
Social Support in America: Stratification and Trends in Access over Two Decades.美国的社会支持:二十年来的分层与获取趋势
Soc Forces. 2019 Dec;98(2):725-752. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
2
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
3
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
The use of Open Dialogue in Trauma Informed Care services for mental health consumers and their family networks: A scoping review.创伤知情护理服务中使用开放对话模式为心理健康消费者及其家庭网络提供服务:范围综述。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Aug;31(4):681-698. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13023. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
5
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对土壤传播蠕虫群体药物给药的看法:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.
6
"Just Ask What Support We Need": Autistic Adults' Feedback on Social Skills Training.“只需询问我们需要什么支持”:成年自闭症患者对社交技能培训的反馈
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):283-292. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0136. eCollection 2025 Jun.
7
Stigma Management Strategies of Autistic Social Media Users.自闭症社交媒体用户的污名管理策略
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):273-282. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0095. eCollection 2025 Jun.
8
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
9
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
10
Diagnostic test accuracy and cost-effectiveness of tests for codeletion of chromosomal arms 1p and 19q in people with glioma.染色体臂 1p 和 19q 缺失的检测在胶质瘤患者中的诊断准确性和成本效益。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 2;3(3):CD013387. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013387.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Older Adults' Descendants and Family Networks in the Context of Global Educational Expansion.全球教育扩张背景下的老年人后代与家庭网络
Popul Dev Rev. 2025 Mar;51(1):213-256. doi: 10.1111/padr.12681. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
2
Traditional and Non-traditional Caregivers Define "Family" and Caregiving Obligations.传统和非传统照顾者对“家庭”和照顾义务的定义。
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2025 Jan-Dec;40:15333175251357328. doi: 10.1177/15333175251357328. Epub 2025 Jul 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Giving Unto Others: Private Financial Transfers and Hardship Among Families with Children.给予他人:有子女家庭中的私人资金转移与困境
J Marriage Fam. 2017 Jun;79(3):705-722. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12392. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
2
Residential Instability, Family Support, and Parent-Child Relationships Among Ethnically Diverse Urban Families.不同种族城市家庭中的居住不稳定、家庭支持与亲子关系
J Marriage Fam. 2016 Aug;78(4):855-870. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12317. Epub 2016 May 26.
3
Does remarriage expand perceptions of kinship support among the elderly?
再婚会扩大老年人对亲属支持的认知吗?
Soc Sci Res. 2003 Jun;32(2):171-190. doi: 10.1016/S0049-089X(02)00046-7.
4
"I'll Give You the World": Socioeconomic Differences in Parental Support of Adult Children.“我将给你整个世界”:成年子女的父母支持方面的社会经济差异
J Marriage Fam. 2015 Aug;77(4):844-865. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12204.
5
Social network activation: the role of health discussion partners in recovery from mental illness.社交网络激活:健康讨论伙伴在精神疾病康复中的作用。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Jan;125:116-28. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.12.033. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
6
The Relationship between Neighborhood Characteristics and Effective Parenting Behaviors: The Role of Social Support.邻里特征与有效育儿行为之间的关系:社会支持的作用。
J Fam Issues. 2012 Dec 1;33(12):1658-1687. doi: 10.1177/0192513X12437693.
7
Who Lacks Support and Why? An Examination of Mothers' Personal Safety Nets.谁缺乏支持以及原因何在?对母亲个人安全保障网络的考察。
J Marriage Fam. 2011 Aug 1;73(4):861-875. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2011.00852.x.
8
Social support concepts and measures.社会支持的概念和测量方法。
J Psychosom Res. 2010 Nov;69(5):511-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.10.001. Epub 2009 Dec 4.
9
Giving to the Good and the Needy: Parental Support of Grown Children.给予亲人和穷人:父母对成年子女的支持。
J Marriage Fam. 2009 Dec 1;71(5):1220-1233. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00665.x.
10
The Social Connectedness of Older Adults: A National Profile*.老年人的社会联系:一份全国性概况*
Am Sociol Rev. 2008;73(2):185-203. doi: 10.1177/000312240807300201.