Suppr超能文献

医院住院部和急诊科阿片类药物管理干预措施的质量指标:一项系统综述

Quality indicators for opioid stewardship interventions in hospital inpatient and emergency departments: a systematic review.

作者信息

Dutkiewicz Chelsea, Jauregui Katelyn, Liu Shania, Dabliz Racha, Patanwala Asad E, Penm Jonathan

机构信息

The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Pharmacy, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Department of Pharmacy, Campbelltown Hospital, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Pain Rep. 2025 Jun 18;10(4):e1284. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001284. eCollection 2025 Aug.

Abstract

A systematic review was conducted to identify existing quality indicators for opioid stewardship in hospital inpatient and emergency departments. Five databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, CENTRAL, and Scopus) and grey literature were searched up to April 2022 to identify articles containing quality indicators for opioid stewardship in the hospital setting. Quality indicators were classified into (1) structure, (2) process, and (3) outcome according to Donabedian model and further analysed as subgroups. Risk of bias assessment was performed by 2 independent reviewers. In total, 4621 articles were identified after duplicates were removed, of which 20 full-text articles were screened for eligibility and 8 articles included in the review. There were 81 quality indicators extracted, of which 49 were unique quality indicators. Analysis produced 25% (12/49) structure, 61% (30/49) process, and 14% (7/49) outcome quality indicators. These quality indicators may be used to developed future quality standards, although further study is needed to improve patient data collection for outcome quality indicators to allow for more holistic evaluation of opioid stewardship programs.

摘要

开展了一项系统评价,以确定医院住院部和急诊科阿片类药物管理的现有质量指标。检索了五个数据库(MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、CENTRAL和Scopus)以及灰色文献,截至2022年4月,以识别包含医院环境中阿片类药物管理质量指标的文章。根据Donabedian模型,质量指标分为:(1)结构指标、(2)过程指标和(3)结果指标,并进一步作为亚组进行分析。由两名独立评审员进行偏倚风险评估。去除重复项后,共识别出4621篇文章,其中筛选了20篇全文文章以确定其是否符合纳入标准,8篇文章纳入综述。共提取了81个质量指标,其中49个为独特的质量指标。分析得出,结构质量指标占25%(12/49),过程质量指标占61%(30/49),结果质量指标占14%(7/49)。这些质量指标可用于制定未来的质量标准,不过还需要进一步研究,以改善结果质量指标的患者数据收集情况,从而更全面地评估阿片类药物管理计划。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19a7/12178301/cf3922bb0295/painreports-10-e1284-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验