• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童内斜视治疗方式的有效性:一项系统评价。

Effectiveness of treatment modalities for childhood esotropia: a systematic review.

作者信息

Alrasheed Saif Hassan, Challa Naveen Kumar, Aljohani Saeed, Almutairi Nawaf M, Alnawmasi Mohammed M

机构信息

Department of Optometry, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2025 Jun 16;13:e19584. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19584. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.7717/peerj.19584
PMID:40538735
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12178246/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Esotropia has several types that commonly manifest in early childhood, with numerous treatment options described in the literature. The aim of this systematic review is to synthesize recent research findings on the management of childhood esotropia (ET) to clarify the relative success rates and specific indications for each treatment option, providing guidance for eye care professionals in selecting the most effective interventions.

METHODOLOGY

A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, ProQuest, Scopus, Google Scholar, EBSCO, and Medline, following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. The search was restricted to articles published between 1990 and 2023 that examined various treatment modalities for different types of childhood esotropia (ET). In this study, success was defined as a post-treatment deviation of less than 10 prism dioptres (PD). The study protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under registration number CRD42024589042.

RESULTS

The final systematic review included 34 studies from 14 countries, encompassing 3,877 children with a mean age of 4.72 ± 2.08 years. The reviewed studies indicated that optical correction had the highest effectiveness rate at 79.31% after an average follow-up of 5.57 years. Extraocular muscle surgery demonstrated an effectiveness rate of 71.4% with a follow-up period of 2.89 years, while botulinum toxin (BT) injections showed a lower effectiveness rate of 61.24% after a follow-up of 3.15 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The review concluded that substantial evidence supports full cycloplegic hyperopic correction as the most effective first-line treatment for childhood accommodative esotropia (AET). However, surgery may be required for some children with AET if their deviation remains over 15 PD after full cycloplegic hyperopic correction. Prismatic correction was highly successful in managing residual deviation in partial AET. Bilateral BT injections proved effective as a first-line treatment for acute-onset ET and infantile ET without a vertical component. Timely surgical intervention enhances sensory outcomes in infantile ET; however, no surgical technique has demonstrated a distinct advantage.

摘要

背景

内斜视有多种类型,常见于儿童早期,文献中描述了众多治疗选择。本系统评价的目的是综合近期关于儿童内斜视(ET)治疗的研究结果,以阐明每种治疗选择的相对成功率和具体适应症,为眼科护理专业人员选择最有效的干预措施提供指导。

方法

按照PRISMA 2020指南,在多个数据库中进行全面检索,包括PubMed、科学网、ProQuest、Scopus、谷歌学术、EBSCO和Medline。检索仅限于1990年至2023年发表的研究不同类型儿童内斜视(ET)各种治疗方式的文章。在本研究中,成功定义为治疗后斜视度小于10棱镜度(PD)。该研究方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO)注册,注册号为CRD42024589042。

结果

最终的系统评价纳入了来自14个国家的34项研究,涉及3877名儿童,平均年龄为4.72±2.08岁。综述研究表明,平均随访5.57年后,光学矫正的有效率最高,为79.31%。眼外肌手术随访2.89年的有效率为71.4%,而肉毒杆菌毒素(BT)注射随访3.15年后的有效率较低,为61.24%。

结论

该综述得出结论,大量证据支持充分的睫状肌麻痹远视矫正作为儿童调节性内斜视(AET)最有效的一线治疗方法。然而,如果一些AET儿童在充分的睫状肌麻痹远视矫正后斜视度仍超过15 PD,则可能需要手术治疗。棱镜矫正在治疗部分AET的残余斜视方面非常成功。双侧BT注射被证明是急性发作性ET和无垂直成分的婴儿型ET的一线有效治疗方法。及时的手术干预可改善婴儿型ET的感觉功能预后;然而,尚无手术技术显示出明显优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b1f/12178246/821c9a3c93d2/peerj-13-19584-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b1f/12178246/821c9a3c93d2/peerj-13-19584-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b1f/12178246/821c9a3c93d2/peerj-13-19584-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of treatment modalities for childhood esotropia: a systematic review.儿童内斜视治疗方式的有效性:一项系统评价。
PeerJ. 2025 Jun 16;13:e19584. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19584. eCollection 2025.
2
Botulinum toxin for the treatment of strabismus.用于治疗斜视的肉毒杆菌毒素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 2;3(3):CD006499. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006499.pub4.
3
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
5
Interventions for eye movement disorders due to acquired brain injury.针对后天性脑损伤所致眼球运动障碍的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 5;3(3):CD011290. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011290.pub2.
6
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
7
Interventions for infantile haemangiomas of the skin.皮肤婴儿血管瘤的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 18;4(4):CD006545. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006545.pub3.
8
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
9
Antiepileptic drug monotherapy for epilepsy: a network meta-analysis of individual participant data.抗癫痫药物单药治疗癫痫:一项个体参与者数据的网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 1;4(4):CD011412. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011412.pub4.
10
Lamotrigine versus carbamazepine monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.拉莫三嗪与卡马西平单药治疗癫痫的疗效比较:个体参与者数据回顾
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 28;6(6):CD001031. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001031.pub4.

本文引用的文献

1
Childhood amblyopia: A systematic review of recent management options.儿童弱视:近期治疗方案的系统评价
Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2024 Jan 6;38(3):201-213. doi: 10.4103/sjopt.sjopt_212_23. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep.
2
Clinical features of Sudanese patients presenting with binocular vision anomalies: A hospital-based study.以医院为基础的研究:苏丹患者出现双眼视异常的临床特征。
J Med Life. 2023 Aug;16(8):1251-1257. doi: 10.25122/jml-2023-0132.
3
Evaluation of the efficacy of botulinum toxin injection for the treatment of infantile esotropia.
肉毒杆菌毒素注射治疗婴儿内斜视的疗效评估。
Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2023 Jun 26;37(2):107-110. doi: 10.4103/sjopt.sjopt_36_22. eCollection 2023 Apr-Jun.
4
Long-Term Effects of Botulinum Toxin A for Horizontal Concomitant Strabismus in Chinese Children.A型肉毒毒素治疗中国儿童水平共同性斜视的长期疗效。
Semin Ophthalmol. 2023 Oct;38(7):638-643. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2023.2181666. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
5
Accommodative esotropia: An outcome analysis from a tertiary center in Oman.调节性内斜视:阿曼一家三级中心的结果分析。
Oman J Ophthalmol. 2022 Nov 2;15(3):274-278. doi: 10.4103/ojo.ojo_80_22. eCollection 2022 Sep-Dec.
6
Abnormal developmental trends of functional connectivity in young children with infantile esotropia.小儿内斜视患儿功能连接的异常发育趋势
Front Neurosci. 2022 Aug 18;16:972882. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.972882. eCollection 2022.
7
The Clinical Characteristics of Amblyopia in Children Under 17 Years of Age in Qassim Region, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯卡西姆地区17岁以下儿童弱视的临床特征
Clin Ophthalmol. 2022 Aug 18;16:2677-2684. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S379550. eCollection 2022.
8
Conventional surgery versus botulinum toxin injections for partially accommodative esotropia.传统手术与肉毒毒素注射治疗部分调节性内斜视的比较。
J AAPOS. 2022 Feb;26(1):16.e1-16.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2021.08.308. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
9
Treatment of partially accommodative esotropia in children using a medial rectus muscle fenestration technique.采用内直肌开窗术治疗儿童部分调节性内斜视。
J AAPOS. 2022 Feb;26(1):14.e1-14.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2021.08.306. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
10
Essential Infantile Esotropia: A Course of Treatment From Our Experience.原发性婴儿型内斜视:基于我们经验的治疗过程
Front Pediatr. 2021 Jul 23;9:695841. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.695841. eCollection 2021.