Joseph Melissa, Ray Jessica M, Chang Jungsoo, Cramer Laura D, Bonz James W, Yang Thomas J, Wong Ambrose H, Auerbach Marc A, Evans Leigh V
Department of Emergency Medicine Yale School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut USA.
National Clinician Scholars Program Yale School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut USA.
AEM Educ Train. 2022 Apr 1;6(2):e10726. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10726. eCollection 2022 Apr.
A variety of stressors are encountered while working in the emergency department and are often recreated in simulation-based medical education. We seek to examine the physiologic and stress state response of participants in a simulated clinical environment to commonly encountered stressors.
Emergency medicine (EM) residents participated in a randomized, controlled trial of six simulated patient encounters with one of three stressors, medical difficulty, interpersonal challenge, and technology/equipment failure, randomized into each scenario. Participants wore smart shirts to measure heart rate variability (HRV) at rest and just after the introduced stressor and completed the Short Stress State Questionnaire (SSSQ) before and after each scenario.
Twenty-seven EM residents participated in the study. Interpersonal challenge resulted in increased distress as measured by SSSQ compared to the other two stressors (one way ANOVA, F[2,144] = 9.95, < 0.001). There was no difference in worry or task engagement across stressors. HRV decreased significantly from rest for all stressors ( = 0.0003, = 0.0112, = 0.0027 for medical difficulty, interpersonal challenge, and equipment failure, respectively), but there was no statistically significant difference between mean change in HRV across stressors (one way ANOVA, F[2,120] = 0.17, = 0.8452).
Interpersonal challenge stressor was significantly associated with an increase in distress in EM residents during the simulated encounters as compared to the other stressors. While heart rate variability decreased from rest for each stressor as expected following stressor introduction, differing stressors did not produce a differential change.
在急诊科工作时会遇到各种压力源,且这些压力源常在基于模拟的医学教育中重现。我们试图研究参与者在模拟临床环境中对常见压力源的生理和应激状态反应。
急诊医学(EM)住院医师参与了一项随机对照试验,其中有六种模拟患者会诊场景,分别涉及三种压力源之一:医疗难题、人际挑战和技术/设备故障,每种场景随机分配。参与者穿着智能衬衫,在休息时和引入压力源后测量心率变异性(HRV),并在每个场景前后完成简短应激状态问卷(SSSQ)。
27名EM住院医师参与了该研究。与其他两种压力源相比,人际挑战导致SSSQ测量的痛苦增加(单因素方差分析,F[2,144]=9.95,P<0.001)。不同压力源在担忧或任务投入方面没有差异。所有压力源导致的HRV从休息时均显著下降(医疗难题、人际挑战和设备故障分别为P=0.0003、P=0.0112、P=0.0027),但不同压力源导致的HRV平均变化之间无统计学显著差异(单因素方差分析,F[2,120]=0.17,P=0.8452)。
与其他压力源相比,人际挑战压力源在模拟会诊期间与EM住院医师痛苦增加显著相关。虽然正如预期的那样,压力源引入后每个压力源导致的心率变异性从休息时下降,但不同压力源并未产生差异变化。