Kaidi Austin C, Zhang Joshua, Subramanian Tejas, Simon Chad, Mai Eric, Ehrlich Adin, Katiyar Prerana, Kazarian Gregory, Bovonratwet Patawut, Sheha Evan, Dowdell James, Qureshi Sheeraz A, Iyer Sravisht
Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
HSS J. 2025 Jun 19:15563316251346443. doi: 10.1177/15563316251346443.
Far-lateral lumbar disk herniation (FLLDH) poses a surgical challenge given the difficulty in visualizing the pathology with traditional techniques. Endoscopic microdiscectomy is a novel technique for the treatment of FLLDH with decreased soft tissue disruption. : We sought to compare the efficacy of tubular versus endoscopic microdiscectomy for FLLDH. : A retrospective cohort study was performed that included patients undergoing uniportal endoscopic or tubular decompression for FLLDH over a 5-year period. The primary outcome was patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Secondary outcomes included operative time, intraoperative radiation, length of stay (LOS), and reoperation/complication rates. Comparisons between non-paired continuous variables were done with a 2-tailed independent sample test. Categorical variables were compared with a χ or a Fisher exact test. Significance was assumed at < .05. : We identified 135 patients, 64 having undergone endoscopic and 71 tubular microdiscectomy. There were no differences in operative times (67.7 vs 68.2 minutes) or LOS (945.5 vs 911.1 minutes). Endoscopic microdiscectomy was associated with increased total fluoroscopy time (105.92 vs 34.66 seconds) and intraoperative radiation dose (33.68 vs 19.12 mGy). Postoperatively, both groups had statistically significant improvements in all PROMs at early and late follow-up. There was no difference in the magnitude of improvement or the rate of postoperative complications/reoperations between the groups. : This retrospective review found that endoscopic microdiscectomy and tubular decompression were effective techniques for the treatment of FLLDH, showing significant improvement in postoperative PROMs and no differences in postoperative complications. However, endoscopic microdiscectomy is associated with increased intraoperative radiation exposure.
远外侧腰椎间盘突出症(FLLDH)由于传统技术难以看清病变情况,因此带来了手术挑战。内镜下显微椎间盘切除术是一种治疗FLLDH的新技术,可减少软组织损伤。我们旨在比较管状与内镜下显微椎间盘切除术治疗FLLDH的疗效。进行了一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了在5年期间接受单孔内镜或管状减压治疗FLLDH的患者。主要结局是患者报告的结局指标(PROMs)。次要结局包括手术时间、术中辐射、住院时间(LOS)以及再次手术/并发症发生率。非配对连续变量之间的比较采用双尾独立样本检验。分类变量采用χ²检验或Fisher精确检验进行比较。显著性水平设定为<0.05。我们确定了135例患者,其中64例行内镜下显微椎间盘切除术,71例行管状显微椎间盘切除术。手术时间(67.7分钟对68.2分钟)或住院时间(945.5分钟对911.1分钟)无差异。内镜下显微椎间盘切除术与总透视时间增加(105.92秒对34.66秒)和术中辐射剂量增加(33.68 mGy对19.12 mGy)相关。术后,两组在早期和晚期随访时所有PROMs均有统计学显著改善。两组之间改善程度或术后并发症/再次手术率无差异。这项回顾性研究发现,内镜下显微椎间盘切除术和管状减压术是治疗FLLDH的有效技术,术后PROMs有显著改善,术后并发症无差异。然而,内镜下显微椎间盘切除术与术中辐射暴露增加有关。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-8-22
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005-7-20
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-10-30
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-10-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-6-9
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-8-21
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025-6-13
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-2-9
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2023-2-1