• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于检测放射治疗中异常处方的新型数据驱动算法的验证

Validation of a Novel Data-Driven Algorithm to Detect Atypical Prescriptions in Radiation Therapy.

作者信息

Thropp Connor, Hepel Jaroslaw, Leech Timothy, Klein Eric E, Li Qiongge

机构信息

Department of Medical Physics, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.

Department of Radiation Oncology at Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island.

出版信息

Adv Radiat Oncol. 2025 May 10;10(7):101804. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2025.101804. eCollection 2025 Jul.

DOI:10.1016/j.adro.2025.101804
PMID:40548162
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12180989/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Erroneous radiation therapy (RT) prescriptions (Rx) can lead to injury or death of patients. A novel data-driven model that uses similarity learning to identify atypical Rx was recently published. In that study, prototype analysis was conducted within a single institution with a single treatment site. The present study sets out to validate the robustness of the model by applying the model to multiple disease sites using a different institution's data.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A query was conducted of Brown University Health RT treatment records for thoracic and brain cancer patients from 1995 to 2021 to create historical databases used for training. The query included records containing data on the Rx and patient-specific features. Simulated anomalies were created to mimic potential errors and were used in the training and testing of the model. Model performance was evaluated using F1 score.

RESULTS

F1 scores for the brain site are 99% for intensity modulated RT, 90% for stereotactic radiation therapy/ radiosurgery/SRT, and 94% for 3-dimensional RT. F1 scores for the thoracic site are 95%, 90%, and 95% for the 3 techniques, respectively. Statistical analysis shows no significant differences between the model's prediction and ground truth.

CONCLUSIONS

The model performance shows feasibility for application to various disease sites across different institutions. This model can be used alongside physicians and physicists during peer review chart rounds to aid in the detection of potential RT Rx errors.

摘要

目的

错误的放射治疗(RT)处方可能导致患者受伤或死亡。最近发表了一种使用相似性学习来识别非典型处方的新型数据驱动模型。在该研究中,在单一机构的单一治疗部位进行了原型分析。本研究旨在通过使用不同机构的数据将该模型应用于多个疾病部位来验证模型的稳健性。

方法和材料

对布朗大学健康放射治疗中心1995年至2021年期间胸癌和脑癌患者的治疗记录进行查询,以创建用于训练的历史数据库。查询包括包含处方和患者特定特征数据的记录。创建模拟异常以模拟潜在错误,并将其用于模型的训练和测试。使用F1分数评估模型性能。

结果

脑部的F1分数在调强放疗中为99%,在立体定向放射治疗/放射外科手术/SRT中为90%,在三维放疗中为94%。胸部的F1分数在这三种技术中分别为95%、90%和95%。统计分析表明模型预测与实际情况之间无显著差异。

结论

模型性能表明该模型可应用于不同机构的各种疾病部位。该模型可在同行评审图表轮次中与医生和物理学家一起使用,以帮助检测潜在的放射治疗处方错误。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5df5/12180989/f1dd33ad830c/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5df5/12180989/4bcdb5137365/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5df5/12180989/20a367df05fc/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5df5/12180989/f1dd33ad830c/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5df5/12180989/4bcdb5137365/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5df5/12180989/20a367df05fc/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5df5/12180989/f1dd33ad830c/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of a Novel Data-Driven Algorithm to Detect Atypical Prescriptions in Radiation Therapy.一种用于检测放射治疗中异常处方的新型数据驱动算法的验证
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2025 May 10;10(7):101804. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2025.101804. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
3
Comparison of the effectiveness of inhaler devices in asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease: a systematic review of the literature.吸入装置在哮喘和慢性阻塞性气道疾病中的有效性比较:文献系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(26):1-149. doi: 10.3310/hta5260.
4
Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断的快速、即时抗原检测。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 22;7(7):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub3.
5
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
6
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
7
Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中的溶栓治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(3):CD000213. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000213.
8
Magnetic resonance perfusion for differentiating low-grade from high-grade gliomas at first presentation.首次就诊时磁共振灌注成像用于鉴别低级别与高级别胶质瘤
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 22;1(1):CD011551. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011551.pub2.
9
The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events.手术不良事件的测量与监测
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(22):1-194. doi: 10.3310/hta5220.
10
Interventions for the treatment of brain radionecrosis after radiotherapy or radiosurgery.放疗或放射外科手术后脑放射性坏死的治疗干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 9;7(7):CD011492. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011492.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
An Automated, Dynamic Radiation Oncology Prescription Checking System.一种自动化动态放射肿瘤学处方检查系统。
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2024 Jul-Aug;14(4):343-352. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2023.12.002. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
2
Introduction. Evolution of radiation therapy techniques.引言。放射治疗技术的演变。
Neurosurg Focus. 2022 Nov;53(5):E1. doi: 10.3171/2022.8.FOCUS22436.
3
A digital physician peer to automatically detect erroneous prescriptions in radiotherapy.一种用于自动检测放射治疗中错误处方的数字医生同行。
NPJ Digit Med. 2022 Oct 21;5(1):158. doi: 10.1038/s41746-022-00703-9.
4
Stop Explaining Black Box Machine Learning Models for High Stakes Decisions and Use Interpretable Models Instead.停止为高风险决策解释黑箱机器学习模型,转而使用可解释模型。
Nat Mach Intell. 2019 May;1(5):206-215. doi: 10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x. Epub 2019 May 13.
5
Virtual Radiation Oncology Peer Review is Associated With Decreased Engagement and Limited Case Discussion: Analysis of a Prospective Database Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.虚拟放射肿瘤学同行评审与参与度降低及病例讨论受限相关:COVID-19大流行之前及期间的前瞻性数据库分析
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2022 Jul 15;113(4):727-731. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.04.026. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
6
Normal tissue complication probability modeling to guide individual treatment planning in pediatric cranial proton and photon radiotherapy.正常组织并发症概率建模以指导儿童颅脑质子和光子放射治疗中的个体化治疗计划。
Med Phys. 2022 Jan;49(1):742-755. doi: 10.1002/mp.15360. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
7
Believing in black boxes: machine learning for healthcare does not need explainability to be evidence-based.相信黑盒:医疗保健的机器学习不需要可解释性即可成为基于证据的。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Feb;142:252-257. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.11.001. Epub 2021 Nov 5.
8
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.立体定向体部放射治疗高危前列腺癌:一项系统评价
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Feb 12;13(4):759. doi: 10.3390/cancers13040759.
9
Structure and Processes of Existing Practice in Radiotherapy Peer Review: A Systematic Review of the Literature.现有放射治疗同行评议实践的结构和流程:文献系统评价。
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2021 Apr;33(4):248-260. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.10.017. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
10
A Blinded, Prospective Study of Error Detection During Physician Chart Rounds in Radiation Oncology.一项关于放射肿瘤学中医生查房期间错误检测的前瞻性盲法研究。
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2020 Sep-Oct;10(5):312-320. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2020.05.012.