Suppr超能文献

静息时左心房和心室应变在预测无明显心肌缺血患者运动诱发的左心室充盈压升高方面的头对头比较。

Head to head comparison of left atrial and ventricular strain at rest in the prediction of exercise-induced elevated left ventricular filling pressure in patients without obvious myocardial ischemia.

作者信息

Takagi Tsutomu

机构信息

Takagi Cardiology Clinic, Kyoto, Japan.

出版信息

J Echocardiogr. 2025 Jun 23. doi: 10.1007/s12574-025-00693-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have reported that left atrial (LA) and left ventricular (LV) strain at rest can predict exercise-induced elevated LV filling pressure. However, head to head comparison of LA and LV strain is very limited. The purpose of this study was to compare the peak atrial longitudinal stain (PALS) and LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) in the prediction of exercise-induced elevated LV filling pressure.

METHODS

From January 2018 to December 2022, 286 consecutive patients underwent treadmill stress echocardiography. Patients with atrial fibrillation, septal E/e' ≥ 15 at rest, and LV ejection fraction < 50% were excluded from the study. Patients lacking PALS or GLS and those with exercise-induced LV wall motion abnormality were also excluded. Finally, 204 patients were enrolled to the analysis. All patients underwent symptom-limited treadmill stress echocardiography, and exercise-induced elevated LV filling pressure was defined as post-exercise septal E/e' ≥ 15.

RESULTS

Forty eight of the 204 patients had post-exercise septal E/e' ≥ 15. Receiver operator characteristic curve analysis revealed the best cutoff value of 23.8% for PALS (sensitivity 67%, specificity 66%, respectively) and -17.7% for GLS (sensitivity 85%, specificity 65%, respectively) to predict post-exercise septal E/e' ≥ 15. Univariate logistic analysis demonstrated that higher age, impaired PALS, impaired GLS, and raised septal E/e' at rest were associated with post-exercise septal E/e' ≥ 15. However, multivariate logistic analysis revealed that age, GLS, and E/e' were independent predictors of post-exercise septal E/e' ≥ 15, but PALS was not.

CONCLUSIONS

Both impaired PALS and GLS at rest can predict post-exercise septal E/e' ≥ 15.0 modestly. However, multivariate logistic analysis has demonstrated that impaired GLS, not PALS, was an independent predictor of exercise-induced elevated LV filling pressure estimated by post-exercise septal E/e' ≥ 15.

摘要

背景

既往研究报道静息状态下左心房(LA)和左心室(LV)应变可预测运动诱发的左心室充盈压升高。然而,LA和LV应变的直接比较非常有限。本研究的目的是比较心房纵向应变峰值(PALS)和左心室整体纵向应变(GLS)对运动诱发的左心室充盈压升高的预测价值。

方法

2018年1月至2022年12月,连续286例患者接受平板运动负荷超声心动图检查。排除心房颤动、静息状态下室间隔E/e'≥15以及左心室射血分数<50%的患者。排除缺乏PALS或GLS以及运动诱发左心室壁运动异常的患者。最终,204例患者纳入分析。所有患者均接受症状限制性平板运动负荷超声心动图检查,运动诱发的左心室充盈压升高定义为运动后室间隔E/e'≥15。

结果

204例患者中有48例运动后室间隔E/e'≥15。受试者工作特征曲线分析显示,预测运动后室间隔E/e'≥15时,PALS的最佳截断值为23.8%(敏感性分别为67%,特异性分别为66%),GLS的最佳截断值为-17.7%(敏感性分别为85%,特异性分别为65%)。单因素逻辑回归分析表明,年龄较大、PALS受损、GLS受损以及静息状态下室间隔E/e'升高与运动后室间隔E/e'≥15相关。然而,多因素逻辑回归分析显示,年龄、GLS和E/e'是运动后室间隔E/e'≥15的独立预测因素,而PALS不是。

结论

静息状态下PALS和GLS受损均能适度预测运动后室间隔E/e'≥15.0。然而,多因素逻辑回归分析表明,GLS受损而非PALS受损是运动后室间隔E/e'≥15所估计的运动诱发的左心室充盈压升高的独立预测因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验