• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头孢噻肟对革兰氏阳性病原体引起的细菌性脑膜炎的单药治疗。

Cefotaxime monotherapy of bacterial meningitis caused by gram-positive pathogens.

作者信息

Helwig H F

出版信息

Infection. 1985;13 Suppl 1:S62-7. doi: 10.1007/BF01644221.

DOI:10.1007/BF01644221
PMID:4055057
Abstract

Primary meningitis in children is caused by two gram-negative bacterial species, Neisseria meningitidis and Haemophilus influenzae, and one gram-positive bacterial species Streptococcus pneumoniae. Despite optimal penicillin susceptibility, with few exceptions, therapeutic results in pneumococcal meningitis are by far worse than with the other two pathogens. Therefore, and because of the detection of penicillin-resistant rods, the study of alternatives in therapy is justified and was started with cefotaxime. Including six of our own patients, there are reports on 87 patients in the literature suffering from S. pneumoniae meningitis who were treated with cefotaxime monotherapy. Results of these studies will be analyzed. As none of these patients belonged to a prospective controlled study group, final evaluation in comparison with penicillin therapy remains open. There are also several reports on successful treatment of group B streptococcus meningitis with cefotaxime, although there is no need to abandon penicillin therapy. Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis meningitis, usually secondary in shunted hydrocephalus, brain tumors, brain injury or other causes, should not be treated with cefotaxime because of its limited activity on these bacteria. Listeria monocytogenes and Streptococcus faecalis are primarily cefotaxime-resistant, and neonatal meningitis of unknown origin, therefore, should not be treated with cefotaxime alone as long as these pathogens cannot be excluded.

摘要

儿童原发性脑膜炎由两种革兰氏阴性菌,即脑膜炎奈瑟菌和流感嗜血杆菌,以及一种革兰氏阳性菌肺炎链球菌引起。尽管肺炎链球菌对青霉素的敏感性最佳,但除少数例外情况外,肺炎球菌性脑膜炎的治疗效果远不如另外两种病原体。因此,并且由于检测到对青霉素耐药的菌株,对替代疗法进行研究是合理的,并且从头孢噻肟开始。包括我们自己的6例患者在内,文献中有87例患肺炎链球菌性脑膜炎的患者接受了头孢噻肟单药治疗的报道。将分析这些研究的结果。由于这些患者均不属于前瞻性对照研究组,因此与青霉素治疗相比的最终评估仍未完成。也有几篇关于用头孢噻肟成功治疗B组链球菌性脑膜炎的报道,尽管没有必要放弃青霉素治疗。金黄色葡萄球菌和表皮葡萄球菌性脑膜炎通常继发于分流性脑积水、脑肿瘤、脑损伤或其他原因,由于其对这些细菌的活性有限,不应使用头孢噻肟治疗。单核细胞增生李斯特菌和粪肠球菌主要对头孢噻肟耐药,因此,只要不能排除这些病原体,不明原因的新生儿脑膜炎就不应单独使用头孢噻肟治疗。

相似文献

1
Cefotaxime monotherapy of bacterial meningitis caused by gram-positive pathogens.头孢噻肟对革兰氏阳性病原体引起的细菌性脑膜炎的单药治疗。
Infection. 1985;13 Suppl 1:S62-7. doi: 10.1007/BF01644221.
2
[Analysis of pathogenic bacteria and drug resistance in neonatal purulent meningitis].新生儿化脓性脑膜炎病原菌及耐药性分析
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Jan;53(1):51-6.
3
Cefotaxime in the treatment of meningitis.
Infection. 1985;13 Suppl 1:S68-72. doi: 10.1007/BF01644222.
4
Cefotaxime therapy of bacterial meningitis in children.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1984 Sep;14 Suppl B:181-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/14.suppl_b.181.
5
[Cefotaxime monotherapy in bacterial meningitis in childhood].
Monatsschr Kinderheilkd. 1986 Oct;134(10):733-7.
6
Pharmacokinetics and clinical evaluation of cefotaxime in children suffering with purulent meningitis.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1984 Sep;14 Suppl B:161-5. doi: 10.1093/jac/14.suppl_b.161.
7
Treatment of 160 cases of acute bacterial meningitis with cefotaxime.用头孢噻肟治疗160例急性细菌性脑膜炎。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1984 Sep;14 Suppl B:195-202. doi: 10.1093/jac/14.suppl_b.195.
8
Treatment of gram-negative bacillary meningitis: role of the new cephalosporin antibiotics.革兰氏阴性杆菌脑膜炎的治疗:新型头孢菌素类抗生素的作用
Rev Infect Dis. 1982 Sep-Oct;4 Suppl:S453-64. doi: 10.1093/clinids/4.supplement_2.s453.
9
Treatment of childhood bacterial meningitis.儿童细菌性脑膜炎的治疗
Infection. 1989 Sep-Oct;17(5):343-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01650726.
10
A comparison of ampicillin-cefotaxime and ampicillin-chloramphenicol in childhood bacterial meningitis: an experience in 55 patients.氨苄西林-头孢噻肟与氨苄西林-氯霉素治疗儿童细菌性脑膜炎的比较:55例患者的经验
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1984 Sep;14 Suppl B:167-80. doi: 10.1093/jac/14.suppl_b.167.

引用本文的文献

1
Cefotaxime. An update of its pharmacology and therapeutic use.头孢噻肟。其药理学与治疗应用的最新进展。
Drugs. 1990 Oct;40(4):608-51. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199040040-00008.

本文引用的文献

1
[Therapy of purulent meningitis in childhood].[儿童化脓性脑膜炎的治疗]
Helv Paediatr Acta. 1947 Nov;2(5):405-42.
2
Specific therapy of bacterial infections of central nervous system.中枢神经系统细菌感染的特异性治疗。
J Am Med Assoc. 1949 Mar 19;139(12):755-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.1949.02900290001001.
3
The treatment of pneumococcic meningitis with massive doses of systemic penicillin.大剂量全身应用青霉素治疗肺炎球菌性脑膜炎
Am J Med Sci. 1949 Feb;217(2):149-56.
4
Relative resistance to penicillin in the pneumococcus. A prevalence and case-control study.肺炎球菌对青霉素的相对耐药性。一项患病率及病例对照研究。
JAMA. 1980 May 9;243(18):1924-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.243.18.1924.
5
Activity of the cefotaxime (HR756) desacetyl metabolite compared with those of cefotaxime and other cephalosporins.头孢噻肟(HR756)去乙酰代谢物与头孢噻肟及其他头孢菌素的活性比较。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Jan;17(1):84-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.17.1.84.
6
[Prevention of pneumococcal, meningococcal and Haemophilus influenzae type B infections in childhood].
Ther Umsch. 1982 Sep;39(9):717-25.
7
[Risk factors in suppurative meningitis in children (author's transl)].[儿童化脓性脑膜炎的危险因素(作者译)]
Klin Padiatr. 1982 Jan;194(1):11-3. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1033761.
8
[Purulent meningitis in children. I. Clinical presentation and course in relation to various bacteria].[儿童化脓性脑膜炎。I. 与各种细菌相关的临床表现及病程]
Padiatr Padol. 1982;17(1):13-41.
9
Pneumococcal meningitis and bacteraemia in Danish children 1969-1978. Serotypes, incidence and outcome.1969 - 1978年丹麦儿童的肺炎球菌性脑膜炎和菌血症。血清型、发病率及转归
Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B. 1983 Apr;91(2):129-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1983.tb00021.x.
10
Landmark perspective: The impact of penicillin on the treatment of meningitis.
JAMA. 1984 Apr 13;251(14):1877-80. doi: 10.1001/jama.1984.03340380059026.