Gao Grace E, Easton Alice V, Salerno Marco M, Angulo Matthew, Buchanan Claudia, Ingram Deandra J, Humphrey Erica, Whitehead Marci, Robinson Errol, Chuck Christine, Burzynski Joseph, Dworkin Felicia, Nilsen Diana, Macaraig Michelle
Bureau of Tuberculosis Control, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Queens, New York, United States of America.
Bureau of Public Health Clinics, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Queens, New York, United States of America.
PLOS Digit Health. 2025 Jun 24;4(6):e0000898. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000898. eCollection 2025 Jun.
In March 2020, three New York City (NYC) Department of Health and Mental Hygiene Tuberculosis (TB) clinics suspended most in-person services due to the COVID-19 pandemic and rapidly implemented telehealth to provide remote TB care. We conducted a prospective cohort study of patients with TB or latent TB infection (LTBI), who received treatment from TB clinics between April 2020 and December 2022, to compare telehealth and in-clinic services. To evaluate the success and breadth of the telehealth program, we compared patients who utilized telehealth with those who did not, analyzing differences in demographic characteristics and key outcomes, including utilization of telehealth, appointment completion, and treatment completion. "Telehealth patients" completed at least one scheduled telehealth visit during the study period. We conducted bivariate analyses comparing telehealth versus in-clinic patients. 56% (497/885) of patients with TB and 45% (954/2127) of patients with LTBI had a telehealth visit. Among patients with TB, no disparities in proportions of telehealth and in-clinic patients were observed for age (p = 0.31) or primary language spoken (p = 0.37). Among patients with LTBI, younger patients were more likely to use telehealth (p < 0.001). Using mixed-effects logistic regression models, the AOR of completing a telehealth visit was lower compared to in-clinic for patients with TB (0.77, CI:0.65-0.91). However, excluding April to June 2020, the AORs of completing a telehealth visit were comparable to an in-clinic visit for patients with TB (0.94, CI:0.77-1.14) and for patients with LTBI (0.96, CI:0.82-1.13). Among 641 patients with drug-susceptible TB, 95% (333/352) of telehealth patients completed treatment within one year compared to 88% (254/289) of in-clinic patients (p = 0.002). This result is limited to the descriptive summary of this study population. During the COVID-19 pandemic, NYC Health Department provided telehealth to many patients with TB and LTBI of diverse demographics, and telehealth services were mostly comparable to in-clinic services.
2020年3月,由于新冠疫情,纽约市卫生和精神卫生部门的三家结核病诊所暂停了大部分面对面服务,并迅速实施远程医疗以提供远程结核病护理。我们对2020年4月至2022年12月期间在结核病诊所接受治疗的结核病或潜伏性结核感染(LTBI)患者进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,以比较远程医疗和诊所内服务。为了评估远程医疗项目的成效和广度,我们将使用远程医疗的患者与未使用的患者进行比较,分析人口统计学特征和关键结果的差异,包括远程医疗的使用、预约完成情况和治疗完成情况。“远程医疗患者”在研究期间至少完成了一次预定的远程医疗就诊。我们进行了双变量分析,比较远程医疗患者和诊所内患者。56%(497/885)的结核病患者和45%(954/2127)的LTBI患者进行了远程医疗就诊。在结核病患者中,远程医疗患者和诊所内患者在年龄(p = 0.31)或主要语言(p = 0.37)方面未观察到比例差异。在LTBI患者中,年轻患者更有可能使用远程医疗(p < 0.001)。使用混合效应逻辑回归模型,结核病患者完成远程医疗就诊的调整后比值比(AOR)低于诊所内就诊(0.77,CI:0.65 - 0.91)。然而,排除2020年4月至6月,结核病患者和LTBI患者完成远程医疗就诊的AOR与诊所内就诊相当(结核病患者为0.94,CI:0.77 - 1.14;LTBI患者为0.96,CI:0.82 - 1.13)。在641例药物敏感结核病患者中,95%(333/352)的远程医疗患者在一年内完成了治疗,而诊所内患者为88%(254/289)(p = 0.002)。该结果仅限于本研究人群的描述性总结。在新冠疫情期间,纽约市卫生部门为许多不同人口统计学特征的结核病和LTBI患者提供了远程医疗服务,且远程医疗服务大多与诊所内服务相当。