Suppr超能文献

青年男性跑步运动员高强度耐力运动不同指标间的生理对应关系

Physiological Correspondence Between Different Indexes of High-Intensity Endurance Exercise in Young Male Runners.

作者信息

Massini Danilo A, Caritá Renato A C, Almeida Tiago A F, Macedo Anderson G, Hernández-Beltrán Víctor, Gamonales José M, Espada Mário C, Pessôa Filho Dalton M

机构信息

Department of Physical Education, School of Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Bauru 17033-360, Brazil.

Postgraduate Program in Human Development and Technology, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Rio Claro 13506-900, Brazil.

出版信息

Sports (Basel). 2025 May 29;13(6):167. doi: 10.3390/sports13060167.

Abstract

Critical speed (CS), the respiratory compensation point (RCP), and the midpoint between gas exchange threshold and maxial oxygen uptake (VO) (i.e., 50%Δ) have been considered indexes able to demarcate the boundary between the heavy and severe exercise domains. However, the agreement between these indexes-and therefore the validity of using them reciprocally-remains to be reported in running. The current study analyzed the agreement between RCP, 50%Δ, and CS. Twelve young runners performed an incremental test to assess VO, RCP, and 50%Δ, with CS estimated by the linear model of time-limited trials at 90, 95, and 110% of the speed corresponding to VOmax. One-way ANOVA showed no differences when comparing VO and running speed at CS vs. 50%Δ vs. RCP (47.5 ± 4.4 vs. 46.6 ± 4.4 vs. 47.8 ± 4.5 mLO∙kg∙min; and 13.9 ± 1.3 vs. 13.7 ± 1.3 vs. 14.0 ± 1.4 km∙h; > 0.05 for all comparisons). The bias for 50%Δ vs. CS was -0.82 ± 1.55 mLO∙kg∙min and -0.23 ± 0.55 km∙h, and for RCP vs. CS, it was 0.36 ± 1.21 mLO∙kg∙min and 0.05 ± 0.46 km∙h. Therefore, the agreement between RCP, 50%Δ, and CS in estimating VO responses and running speed did not preclude their reciprocal similarity in exercise intensity, although the observed individual variability in physiological variables is a constraint on considering these indexes interchangeable.

摘要

临界速度(CS)、呼吸补偿点(RCP)以及气体交换阈值与最大摄氧量(VO₂)之间的中点(即50%Δ)被认为是能够划分重度和极重度运动区间界限的指标。然而,这些指标之间的一致性——以及因此相互使用它们的有效性——在跑步运动中仍有待报道。本研究分析了RCP、50%Δ和CS之间的一致性。12名年轻跑步者进行了递增测试,以评估VO₂、RCP和50%Δ,并通过限时试验的线性模型在对应于最大摄氧量速度的90%、95%和110%时估算CS。单因素方差分析显示,比较CS、50%Δ和RCP时VO₂和跑步速度无差异(分别为47.5±4.4、46.6±4.4和47.8±4.5 mL·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹;以及13.9±1.3、13.7±1.3和14.0±1.4 km·h;所有比较P>0.05)。50%Δ与CS相比的偏差为-0.82±1.55 mL·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹和-0.23±0.55 km·h,RCP与CS相比的偏差为0.36±1.21 mL·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹和0.05±0.46 km·h。因此,RCP、50%Δ和CS在估计VO₂反应和跑步速度方面的一致性并不排除它们在运动强度方面的相互相似性,尽管观察到的生理变量个体变异性限制了将这些指标视为可互换的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5205/12197207/f74c76ffb5e4/sports-13-00167-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验