Mihaylova Anna, Yaneva Antoniya, Shopova Dobromira, Kasnakova Petya, Harizanova Stanislava, Parahuleva Nikoleta, Etova Rumyana, Raykova Ekaterina, Semerdzhieva Mariya, Bakova Desislava
Department of Health Care Management, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Department of Medical Informatics, Biostatistics and e-Learning, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Pharmacy (Basel). 2025 Jun 19;13(3):88. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy13030088.
Advances in pharmaceutical technology have positioned 3D printing and bioprinting as promising tools for developing personalized drug therapies. These innovations may redefine compounding practices by enabling precise, patient-specific drug formulations. Evaluating pharmacists' readiness to adopt such technologies is therefore becoming increasingly important. The aim of this study is to investigate pharmacists' knowledge, attitudes, and perceived barriers regarding the application of 3D printing and bioprinting technologies, as well as their perspectives on the regulation and implementation of these technologies in the context of personalized pharmacy. A custom-designed questionnaire was developed for the purposes of this pilot study, based on a review of the existing literature and informed by expert consultation to ensure conceptual relevance and clarity. The survey was conducted between September and December 2024. The data collection instrument comprises three main sections: (1) sociodemographic and professional characteristics, (2) knowledge regarding the applications of 3D printing and bioprinting in pharmacy, and (3) attitudes toward the regulatory framework and implementation of these technologies. A total of 353 respondents participated, and 65.5% of them (n = 231) correctly distinguished between the concepts of "3D printing" and "bioprinting." More than 25% (n = 88) were uncertain, and 8.5% (n = 30) were unable to differentiate between the two. Regarding the perceived benefits of personalized pharmacy, 83% (n = 293) of participants identified "the creation of personalized medications tailored to individual needs" as the main advantage, while 66% (n = 233) highlighted the "optimization of drug concentration to enhance therapeutic efficacy and minimize toxicity and adverse effects." Approximately 60% (n = 210) of the pharmacists surveyed believed that the introduction of 3D-bioprinted pharmaceuticals would have a positive impact on the on-site preparation of customized drug formulations in community and hospital pharmacies. Lack of regulatory guidance and unresolved ethical concerns were identified as primary barriers. Notably, over 40% (n = 142) of respondents expressed concern that patients could be subjected to treatment approaches resembling "laboratory experimentation." Nearly 90% (n = 317) of participants recognized the need for specialized training and expressed a willingness to engage in such educational initiatives. Three-dimensional printing and bioprinting technologies are considered cutting-edge instruments that may contribute to the advancement of pharmaceutical practice and industry, particularly in the field of personalized medicine. However, respondents' views suggest that successful integration may require improved pharmacist awareness and targeted educational initiatives, along with the development and adaptation of appropriate regulatory frameworks to accommodate these novel technologies in drug design and compounding.
制药技术的进步使3D打印和生物打印成为开发个性化药物疗法的有前景的工具。这些创新可能通过实现精确的、针对患者的药物配方来重新定义配药实践。因此,评估药剂师采用此类技术的准备情况变得越来越重要。本研究的目的是调查药剂师关于3D打印和生物打印技术应用的知识、态度和感知到的障碍,以及他们在个性化药学背景下对这些技术的监管和实施的看法。基于对现有文献的回顾并经专家咨询以确保概念的相关性和清晰度,为本试点研究设计了一份定制问卷。调查于2024年9月至12月进行。数据收集工具包括三个主要部分:(1)社会人口统计学和专业特征,(2)关于3D打印和生物打印在药学中应用的知识,以及(3)对这些技术的监管框架和实施的态度。共有353名受访者参与,其中65.5%(n = 231)正确区分了“3D打印”和“生物打印”的概念。超过25%(n = 88)的人不确定,8.5%(n = 30)无法区分两者。关于个性化药学的感知益处,83%(n = 293)的参与者认为“根据个体需求创建个性化药物”是主要优势,而66%(n = 233)强调“优化药物浓度以提高治疗效果并最小化毒性和不良反应”。大约60%(n = 210)接受调查的药剂师认为引入3D生物打印药物将对社区和医院药房现场制备定制药物配方产生积极影响。缺乏监管指导和未解决的伦理问题被确定为主要障碍。值得注意的是,超过40%(n = 142)的受访者担心患者可能会接受类似“实验室实验”的治疗方法。近90%(n = 317)的参与者认识到需要专门培训,并表示愿意参与此类教育活动。3D打印和生物打印技术被认为是前沿工具,可能有助于制药实践和行业的发展,特别是在个性化医学领域。然而,受访者的观点表明,成功整合可能需要提高药剂师的认识和有针对性的教育活动,以及制定和调整适当的监管框架,以在药物设计和配药中适应这些新技术。