Weschenfelder Wolfram, Koeglmeier Katharina Lucia, Weschenfelder Friederike, Spiegel Christian, Malouhi Amer, Gassler Nikolaus, Hofmann Gunther Olaf
Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Jena, 07747 Jena, Germany.
Department of Obstetrics, University Hospital Jena, 07747 Jena, Germany.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jun 17;15(12):1538. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15121538.
: This study aimed to develop a reliable scoring system combining clinical and radiological parameters to distinguish atypical lipomatous tumours (ALTs) from lipomas, improving diagnostic accuracy and reducing expensive molecular pathology testing. : A retrospective analysis of 188 patients who underwent surgery for lipomatous tumours was conducted. Patient data, including medical history, pathology, and MRI imaging results, were reviewed. Four predictive models were developed using various clinical and imaging parameters, including age, tumour size, location, and MRI characteristics (homogeneity, contrast enhancement). Statistical analysis, including ROC curve analysis and logistic regression, was performed to assess the accuracy of these models. : The highest predictive accuracy was achieved with Model 1, which included seven parameters, yielding an AUC of 0.952. This model achieved a sensitivity of 96.4% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 97.2%. Reducing the number of parameters lowered the accuracy, with contrast enhancement playing a significant role in Model 1. A risk calculator based on the optimal model was developed, offering an effective tool for clinical use that can be provided. Notably, 21 out of 37 ALTs lacked atypia and would have been missed without molecular testing. : The developed scoring system, based on clinical and imaging parameters, accurately distinguishes ALTs from lipomas, offering a practical alternative to molecular pathology testing. This multi-parameter approach significantly improves diagnostic reliability, reducing the risk of misclassification and false negatives, while also potentially lowering healthcare costs.
本研究旨在开发一种可靠的评分系统,将临床和放射学参数相结合,以区分非典型脂肪瘤(ALT)和脂肪瘤,提高诊断准确性并减少昂贵的分子病理学检测。
对188例接受脂肪瘤手术的患者进行了回顾性分析。回顾了患者数据,包括病史、病理和MRI成像结果。使用各种临床和影像参数,包括年龄、肿瘤大小、位置和MRI特征(均匀性、对比增强),开发了四个预测模型。进行了包括ROC曲线分析和逻辑回归在内的统计分析,以评估这些模型的准确性。
模型1的预测准确性最高,该模型包含七个参数,AUC为0.952。该模型的敏感性为96.4%,阴性预测值(NPV)为97.2%。减少参数数量会降低准确性,对比增强在模型1中起重要作用。基于最佳模型开发了一个风险计算器,为临床使用提供了一种有效的工具。值得注意的是,37例ALT中有21例缺乏异型性,如果不进行分子检测就会漏诊。
基于临床和影像参数开发的评分系统能够准确区分ALT和脂肪瘤,为分子病理学检测提供了一种实用的替代方法。这种多参数方法显著提高了诊断可靠性,降低了错误分类和假阴性的风险,同时还可能降低医疗成本。