• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

硬膜外导管碎片残留的管理:个体患者数据的叙述性综述

Management of Retained Epidural Catheter Fragments: A Narrative Review of Individual Patient Data.

作者信息

Corr Felix, Almealawy Yasser F, Heinig Silvio, Bättig Linda, Schulz Erik, Hejrati Nader, Bertulli Lorenzo, Heisinger Stephan, Bozinov Oliver, Stienen Martin N, Motov Stefan

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery & Interdisciplinary Spine Center, HOCH Health Ostschweiz, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, Rorschacher Strasse 95, 9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland.

Faculty of Medicine, University of Kufa, Kufa P.O. Box 21, Iraq.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 16;14(12):4265. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124265.

DOI:10.3390/jcm14124265
PMID:40566010
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12193838/
Abstract

Retained epidural catheter fragments are an infrequent but clinically relevant complication of neuraxial anesthesia. Optimal management remains undefined, with limited evidence guiding treatment selection or risk stratification. This systematic review synthesized individual patient data to compare treatment strategies, examine surgical outcomes, and determine predictors of intervention. A systematic review was conducted across six databases in accordance with PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD420025638305). Adult cases of retained epidural catheter fragments were included. Functional outcomes were standardized using modified MacNab, McCormick, and Therapy-Disability-Neurology (TDN) scores. Predictors of surgery and detectability were assessed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models with Firth correction. Forty studies comprising 51 patients were included. Conservative management was chosen in 23 cases (45%); 39.1% ( = 9) ultimately required delayed surgery due to symptom onset during follow-up. Surgical removal ( = 28, 55%) was safe and yielded excellent outcomes in 95.8% of cases. Fragment length was significantly associated with increased odds of surgery (OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.01-1.10, = 0.04), while catheter material was associated with surgery in univariate analysis (OR = 2.49, 95% CI: 1.08-9.00, = 0.03). An MRI demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.859, cutoff = 70 mm catheter length), outperforming CT (AUC = 0.611) and X-ray (AUC = 0.533). Across all patients, 84.3% achieved "Excellent" recovery per MacNab, with no neurological deterioration in any surgical case. Surgical removal of retained epidural catheter fragments is safe and effective in symptomatic patients. Conservative management is viable for asymptomatic cases under structured surveillance. Catheter material and fragment length may dictate imaging selection and treatment decisions.

摘要

硬膜外导管碎片残留是一种少见但具有临床相关性的神经轴索麻醉并发症。最佳治疗方案尚不明确,指导治疗选择或风险分层的证据有限。本系统评价综合个体患者数据以比较治疗策略、检查手术结果并确定干预的预测因素。根据PRISMA指南(国际前瞻性系统评价注册平台:CRD420025638305)在六个数据库中进行了系统评价。纳入成年硬膜外导管碎片残留病例。使用改良的MacNab、McCormick和治疗-残疾-神经病学(TDN)评分对功能结局进行标准化。使用带有Firth校正的单因素和多因素逻辑回归模型评估手术和可检测性的预测因素。纳入了40项研究,共51例患者。23例(45%)选择保守治疗;39.1%(n = 9)因随访期间出现症状最终需要延迟手术。手术取出(n = 28,55%)是安全的,95.8%的病例取得了良好的结果。碎片长度与手术几率增加显著相关(比值比[OR]=1.05,95%置信区间[CI]:1.01-1.10,P = 0.04),而导管材料在单因素分析中与手术相关(OR = 2.49,95% CI:1.08-9.00,P = 0.03)。磁共振成像(MRI)显示出最高的诊断准确性(曲线下面积[AUC]=0.859,临界值=导管长度70 mm),优于计算机断层扫描(CT)(AUC = 0.611)和X线(AUC = 0.533)。在所有患者中,根据MacNab标准,84.3%实现了“优秀”恢复,任何手术病例均未出现神经功能恶化。对于有症状的患者,手术取出残留的硬膜外导管碎片是安全有效的。在有组织的监测下,无症状病例采用保守治疗是可行的。导管材料和碎片长度可能决定影像学选择和治疗决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d14a/12193838/2198a61cb7b5/jcm-14-04265-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d14a/12193838/a07cdcf15f08/jcm-14-04265-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d14a/12193838/5498256f2fd2/jcm-14-04265-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d14a/12193838/e5eb5584dce8/jcm-14-04265-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d14a/12193838/e9e4cedc134a/jcm-14-04265-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d14a/12193838/45bf351e97ce/jcm-14-04265-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d14a/12193838/2198a61cb7b5/jcm-14-04265-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d14a/12193838/a07cdcf15f08/jcm-14-04265-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d14a/12193838/5498256f2fd2/jcm-14-04265-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d14a/12193838/e5eb5584dce8/jcm-14-04265-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d14a/12193838/e9e4cedc134a/jcm-14-04265-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d14a/12193838/45bf351e97ce/jcm-14-04265-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d14a/12193838/2198a61cb7b5/jcm-14-04265-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Management of Retained Epidural Catheter Fragments: A Narrative Review of Individual Patient Data.硬膜外导管碎片残留的管理:个体患者数据的叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 16;14(12):4265. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124265.
2
Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews.分娩期女性的疼痛管理:系统评价综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;2012(3):CD009234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009234.pub2.
3
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
4
Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour.硬膜外镇痛与非硬膜外镇痛或无镇痛用于分娩疼痛管理的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 21;5(5):CD000331. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub4.
5
Continuous intravenous perioperative lidocaine infusion for postoperative pain and recovery in adults.成人围手术期持续静脉输注利多卡因用于术后疼痛及恢复
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 4;6(6):CD009642. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009642.pub3.
6
Use of platelet transfusions prior to lumbar punctures or epidural anaesthesia for the prevention of complications in people with thrombocytopenia.在腰椎穿刺或硬膜外麻醉前使用血小板输注以预防血小板减少症患者的并发症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 30;4(4):CD011980. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011980.pub3.
7
Patient-controlled analgesia with remifentanil versus alternative parenteral methods for pain management in labour.瑞芬太尼患者自控镇痛与其他胃肠外方法用于分娩疼痛管理的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 13;4(4):CD011989. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011989.pub2.
8
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
9
Intravenous versus inhalational maintenance of anaesthesia for postoperative cognitive outcomes in elderly people undergoing non-cardiac surgery.非心脏手术老年患者术后认知结局:静脉麻醉维持与吸入麻醉维持的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 21;8(8):CD012317. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012317.pub2.
10
Hypnosis for pain management during labour and childbirth.分娩过程中疼痛管理的催眠疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 19;2016(5):CD009356. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009356.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Extraction of a Torn Epidural Catheter in the Thoracolumbar Junction via Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy.经单侧双孔道内镜在胸腰段交界处取出断裂的硬膜外导管
World Neurosurg. 2025 Jan;193:1058. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.11.108. Epub 2024 Dec 29.
2
Broken Epidural Catheter After Vaginal Delivery.阴道分娩后硬膜外导管断裂
Cureus. 2024 Feb 27;16(2):e55013. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55013. eCollection 2024 Feb.
3
When The Unexpected Happens: The Intriguing Retrieval of a Broken Epidural Catheter.当意外发生时:一例折断硬膜外导管的有趣取出过程
J Orthop Case Rep. 2024 Feb;14(2):136-139. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2024.v14.i02.4246.
4
Rare Image of Epidural Catheter Fracture in Lumbar Analgesia.腰椎镇痛中硬膜外导管断裂的罕见影像
Case Rep Anesthesiol. 2023 Aug 28;2023:8880024. doi: 10.1155/2023/8880024. eCollection 2023.
5
Fractured epidural catheter with retained fragment in the epidural space-a case study and proposed management algorithm.硬膜外导管断裂且碎片残留于硬膜外腔——一例病例报告及拟议的处理流程
BJA Open. 2022 Oct 4;4:100095. doi: 10.1016/j.bjao.2022.100095. eCollection 2022 Dec.
6
Percutaneous fully endoscopic surgical management of the ruptured epidural catheter: Rescue of the novice anesthesiologist from his dilemma.经皮全内镜手术治疗硬膜外导管破裂:帮助新手麻醉医生摆脱困境
Front Surg. 2022 Oct 11;9:915133. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.915133. eCollection 2022.
7
Fractured Lumbar Drain Catheter Retrieval Using an Endoscopic Transforaminal Approach to the Lumbar Spine.经皮内镜下椎间孔入路腰椎骨折引流管取出术。
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2022 Nov 1;23(5):e331-e334. doi: 10.1227/ons.0000000000000378. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
8
Minimally Invasive Surgery to Remove a Broken and Retained Epidural Catheter Fragment.微创外科手术取出断裂并残留的硬膜外导管碎片。
Cureus. 2022 May 23;14(5):e25255. doi: 10.7759/cureus.25255. eCollection 2022 May.
9
Adverse Events in Neurosurgery: The Novel Therapy-Disability-Neurology Grade.神经外科学中的不良事件:新型治疗-残疾-神经病学分级。
Neurosurgery. 2021 Jul 15;89(2):236-245. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyab121.
10
Incidental unintentional breakage of epidural catheter in supralaminar area: A case report.硬膜外导管在椎板上区域意外无意断裂:一例报告。
Surg Neurol Int. 2021 Mar 30;12:129. doi: 10.25259/SNI_745_2020. eCollection 2021.