Suppr超能文献

医护人员中氯喷雾的职业健康影响:替代消毒剂及应用方法的系统评价与荟萃分析

Occupational Health Effects of Chlorine Spraying in Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Alternative Disinfectants and Application Methods.

作者信息

Fontana Luca, Stabile Luca, Caracci Elisa, Chaillon Antoine, Kothari Kavita U, Buonanno Giorgio

机构信息

Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Università degli Studi di Cassino e del Lazio Meridionale (UNICAS), 03043 Cassino, Italy.

Center for AIDS Research (CFAR), University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jun 16;22(6):942. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22060942.

Abstract

Chlorine spraying was widely used during filovirus outbreaks, but concerns about occupational health risks led to a shift toward wiping. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the health risks associated with exposure to disinfectants among healthcare workers (HCWs), with a specific focus on chlorine-based products and spraying compared to alternative disinfectants and general disinfection tasks (GDTs). PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched from inception to March 2025. Eligible studies included observational or experimental research on HCWs exposed to chemical disinfectants. Two reviewers independently screened studies, assessed the risk of bias using a validated occupational health tool, and evaluated evidence certainty with the GRADE approach. Meta-analyses used fixed- and random-effects models; heterogeneity was assessed with I statistics. Out of 7154 records, 29 studies were included. Most studies were cross-sectional with a high bias risk. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using non-exposed groups as reference. Significant associations with respiratory conditions were found for chlorine-based products (OR 1.71), glutaraldehyde (OR 1.44), spraying (OR 2.25), and GDTs (OR 2.20). Exposure to chlorine-based products, glutaraldehyde, spraying, and GDTs likely increases respiratory risk in HCWs, as supported by moderate-certainty evidence. These findings support prioritizing safer disinfectants and strengthening protective measures over banning specific application methods.

摘要

在丝状病毒爆发期间,氯喷雾消毒被广泛使用,但由于对职业健康风险的担忧,消毒方式逐渐转向擦拭消毒。本系统评价旨在评估医护人员接触消毒剂所面临的健康风险,特别关注氯基产品和喷雾消毒与其他消毒剂及一般消毒任务(GDT)相比的情况。检索了PubMed、Embase和Scopus数据库,检索时间范围从建库至2025年3月。符合条件的研究包括关于接触化学消毒剂的医护人员的观察性或实验性研究。两名 reviewers 独立筛选研究,使用经过验证的职业健康工具评估偏倚风险,并采用GRADE方法评估证据的确定性。荟萃分析使用固定效应模型和随机效应模型;异质性用I统计量进行评估。在7154条记录中,纳入了29项研究。大多数研究为横断面研究,偏倚风险较高。以未暴露组作为对照计算比值比(OR)。发现氯基产品(OR 1.71)、戊二醛(OR 1.44)、喷雾消毒(OR 2.25)和一般消毒任务(OR 2.20)与呼吸道疾病存在显著关联。中等确定性证据支持,接触氯基产品、戊二醛、喷雾消毒和一般消毒任务可能会增加医护人员的呼吸道风险。这些发现支持优先选择更安全的消毒剂,并加强防护措施,而非禁止特定的应用方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验