• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在比利时和越南的急性和亚急性中风幸存者中,6分钟步行试验和2分钟步行试验是否等效:一项多文化研究。

Are the 6-minute walk test and the 2-minute walk test equivalent in acute and subacute stroke survivors in Belgium and Vietnam: a multicultural study.

作者信息

Nguyen Duy Thanh, Sauvage Chloé, Questienne Claire, Duchène Michel, Nguyen Duan Van, Nguyen Dung Tan, Penta Massimo

机构信息

University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.

Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium; Service de Kinésithérapie, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Hôpital Erasme, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

J Rehabil Med. 2025 Jun 25;57:jrm42665. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v57.42665.

DOI:10.2340/jrm.v57.42665
PMID:40566653
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To test the equivalence of the 6-minute walk test and the 2-minute walk test in stroke survivors in a multicultural setting, focusing on reliability, performance, and associations with clinical and anthropometric factors.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional observational study.

SUBJECTS/PATIENTS: 238 participants (119 stroke survivors and 119 healthy individuals matched for age and sex).

METHODS

Participants were assessed using the 6-minute walk test and the 2-minute walk test in Belgium and Vietnam. Stroke survivors were assessed in the acute and subacute phases (17 days post-stroke) and reassessed after 1-3 days.

RESULTS

The 6-minute walk test and the 2-minute walk test showed high test-retest reliability (ICC > 0.96). The difference between the two tests was not significant in terms of walking distance reduction in stroke survivors relative to healthy participants (1.4%), not clinically meaningful for walking speed (0.026 m/s), and not significant in chronotropic response (1.6 bpm). The correlation between the 2 tests in stroke survivors was high (r = 0.93) and walking distance was moderately related to height, weight, and phase, and type of stroke (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The 6-minute walk test and the 2-minute walk test exhibited similar results in measuring the impact of stroke on walking performance. The similarity between Belgium and Vietnam further supports the clinical equivalence of both tests among acute and subacute stroke survivors.

摘要

目的

在多元文化背景下,测试6分钟步行试验和2分钟步行试验在中风幸存者中的等效性,重点关注可靠性、表现以及与临床和人体测量因素的关联。

设计

横断面观察性研究。

受试者/患者:238名参与者(119名中风幸存者和119名年龄和性别匹配的健康个体)。

方法

在比利时和越南,使用6分钟步行试验和2分钟步行试验对参与者进行评估。中风幸存者在急性期和亚急性期(中风后17天)接受评估,并在1 - 3天后重新评估。

结果

6分钟步行试验和2分钟步行试验显示出较高的重测信度(组内相关系数>0.96)。在中风幸存者相对于健康参与者的步行距离减少方面,两种测试之间差异不显著(1.4%),对步行速度而言差异无临床意义(0.026米/秒),在变时反应方面差异也不显著(1.6次/分钟)。中风幸存者中两种测试之间的相关性较高(r = 0.93),步行距离与身高、体重、阶段以及中风类型存在中度相关性(p < 0.05)。

结论

6分钟步行试验和2分钟步行试验在测量中风对步行表现的影响方面显示出相似结果。比利时和越南之间的相似性进一步支持了这两种测试在急性和亚急性中风幸存者中的临床等效性。

相似文献

1
Are the 6-minute walk test and the 2-minute walk test equivalent in acute and subacute stroke survivors in Belgium and Vietnam: a multicultural study.在比利时和越南的急性和亚急性中风幸存者中,6分钟步行试验和2分钟步行试验是否等效:一项多文化研究。
J Rehabil Med. 2025 Jun 25;57:jrm42665. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v57.42665.
2
The minimally clinically important difference in the 2-minute walk test for people in the subacute phase after a stroke.中风亚急性期患者2分钟步行试验的最小临床重要差异。
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2025 Jul;32(5):553-561. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2024.2417643. Epub 2024 Nov 11.
3
Circuit class therapy for improving mobility after stroke.用于改善中风后运动能力的循环类疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 2;6(6):CD007513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007513.pub3.
4
External Validation and Update of Minimal Important Change in the 6-Minute Walk Test in Hospitalized Patients With Subacute Stroke.亚急性卒中住院患者6分钟步行试验最小重要变化的外部验证与更新
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2025 Jul;106(7):1039-1045. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2025.01.002. Epub 2025 Jan 13.
5
Physical exercise training interventions for children and young adults during and after treatment for childhood cancer.针对儿童癌症治疗期间及治疗后的儿童和青少年的体育锻炼训练干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 31;3(3):CD008796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008796.pub3.
6
Treadmill training and body weight support for walking after stroke.中风后步行的跑步机训练与体重支持
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 17;8(8):CD002840. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002840.pub4.
7
Intrarater and Interrater Reliability and Concurrent Validity of the 3-Meter Backward Walk Test in Non-frail, Pre-frail, and Frail Older Adults in Residential Care Homes.3米向后步行测试在养老院非衰弱、衰弱前期和衰弱老年人中的评分者内与评分者间信度及同时效度
Phys Ther. 2025 Jun 2;105(6). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaf066.
8
Effect of Aerobic Exercise Interventions on Mobility among Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review.有氧运动干预对中风患者活动能力的影响:一项系统综述。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Mar;95(3):214-24. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000416.
9
Electromyography (EMG)-triggered transcutaneous spinal cord and hip stimulation for gait rehabilitation in persons with chronic stroke: a randomized, controlled trial.肌电图(EMG)触发的经皮脊髓和髋部刺激用于慢性卒中患者的步态康复:一项随机对照试验。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025 Jul 7;22(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12984-025-01690-0.
10
Validity and stability of the international physical activity questionnaire short-form for stroke survivors with preserved walking ability.适用于步行能力保留的中风幸存者的国际体力活动问卷简表的效度和稳定性
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2025 Jul;32(5):562-571. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2024.2417645. Epub 2024 Oct 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and Comparison of Reference Equations for the Six-Minute Walk Test in Spanish Healthy Adults Aged 45-85 Years.西班牙45至85岁健康成年人六分钟步行试验参考方程的制定与比较
Arch Bronconeumol. 2025 Aug;61(8):459-466. doi: 10.1016/j.arbres.2025.01.005. Epub 2025 Jan 17.
2
Normative values in healthy adults for the 6-minute and 2-minute walk tests in Belgium and Vietnam: implications for clinical practice.健康成年人在比利时和越南的 6 分钟和 2 分钟步行测试的正常值:对临床实践的影响。
J Rehabil Med. 2024 Mar 19;56:jrm18628. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v56.18628.
3
Validity of the two-minute walk test to assess exercise capacity and estimate cardiorespiratory fitness in individuals after stroke: a cross-sectional study.
两分钟步行试验评估卒中后个体运动能力及估计心肺适能的效度:一项横断面研究
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2024 Mar;31(2):125-134. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2023.2217639. Epub 2023 May 27.
4
The 2-min walk test could replace the 6-min walk test in ambulant persons with subacute or chronic stroke: a two-stage retrospective study.2分钟步行试验可替代亚急性或慢性卒中患者的6分钟步行试验:一项两阶段回顾性研究。
Int J Rehabil Res. 2023 Mar 1;46(1):41-45. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000556. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
5
Prevalence of Walking Limitation After Acute Stroke and Its Impact on Discharge to Home.急性脑卒中后行走受限的发生率及其对出院回家的影响。
Phys Ther. 2022 Jan 1;102(1). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzab246.
6
Classification of cardiorespiratory fitness using the six-minute walk test in adults: Comparison with cardiopulmonary exercise testing.使用六分钟步行试验对成年人进行心肺适能分类:与心肺运动试验的比较。
Pulmonology. 2021 Nov-Dec;27(6):500-508. doi: 10.1016/j.pulmoe.2021.03.006. Epub 2021 May 4.
7
Comparison between Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Strokes in Functional Outcome at Discharge from an Intensive Rehabilitation Hospital.强化康复医院出院时缺血性和出血性中风功能结局的比较。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Dec 28;11(1):38. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11010038.
8
Gait rehabilitation after stroke: review of the evidence of predictors, clinical outcomes and timing for interventions.脑卒中后步态康复:预测因素、临床结局和干预时机的证据综述。
Acta Neurol Belg. 2020 Aug;120(4):783-790. doi: 10.1007/s13760-020-01320-7. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
9
Alternative approaches for confounding adjustment in observational studies using weighting based on the propensity score: a primer for practitioners.使用基于倾向评分的加权法在观察性研究中进行混杂因素调整的替代方法:从业者入门指南
BMJ. 2019 Oct 23;367:l5657. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5657.
10
The validity and reliability of the Incremental Shuttle Walk Test and Six-minute Walk Test compared to an Incremental Cycle Test for people who have had a mild-to-moderate stroke.对轻中度脑卒中患者进行递增式穿梭步行试验和 6 分钟步行试验与递增式踏车试验的有效性和可靠性比较。
Physiotherapy. 2019 Jun;105(2):275-282. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2018.12.005. Epub 2018 Dec 21.