• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

口渴了?选喝水!确定行为和环境干预对青少年水和含糖饮料消费的影响:一项随机对照试验。

The outcomes of Thirsty? Choose Water! Determining the effects of a behavioural and an environmental intervention on water and sugar sweetened beverage consumption in adolescents: A randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Gowland-Ella Justine, Batchelor Samantha, David Michael, Lewis Peter, Kajons Nicole

机构信息

Health Promotion Service, Central Coast Local Health District, Gosford, NSW, Australia.

Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Health Promot J Austr. 2023 Apr;34(2):410-419. doi: 10.1002/hpja.623. Epub 2022 Jun 22.

DOI:10.1002/hpja.623
PMID:35637595
Abstract

ISSUE ADDRESSED

Childhood obesity is a serious public health challenge. Consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) is one contributing factor, with adolescents being the highest consumers.

METHODS

This study used a randomised controlled trial and two-by-two factorial design to determine the effectiveness of a school-based behavioural intervention (including education/promotional messages) and/or environmental intervention (chilled water station), on encouraging adolescents to choose water instead of SSBs. Sixty-one secondary schools (n = 8992 eligible students year 7 student) were recruited and randomly allocated to one of four study groups, the behavioural intervention, the environmental intervention, both interventions or neither.

RESULTS

The primary outcome was increased water consumption; secondary outcomes included changes in students' knowledge and attitudes about water and SSBs and changes in SSB consumption. For students who received at least one intervention there was an increased odds (though not statistically significant) of higher water consumption compared to those that received no intervention. There was a decrease in SSB consumption for students who received both interventions combined (OR: 0.67; 95% confidence interval: 0.55-0.082; P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

The combined intervention had a greater effect on decreasing SSBs consumption. This is noteworthy given SSBs are a key contributor to overweight and obesity. SO WHAT?: To our knowledge this is the first Australian study examining combined school-based interventions to specifically promote the consumption of water and decrease the consumption of SSBs in adolescents. The study findings add to the evidence regarding the benefits of delivering multicomponent school-based interventions which add value to existing interventions that address the complex public health issue of overweight and obesity.

摘要

研究问题

儿童肥胖是一项严峻的公共卫生挑战。饮用含糖饮料(SSB)是一个促成因素,青少年是这类饮料的最大消费群体。

方法

本研究采用随机对照试验和二乘二析因设计,以确定一项基于学校的行为干预措施(包括教育/宣传信息)和/或环境干预措施(冷水供应站)在鼓励青少年选择水而非含糖饮料方面的有效性。研究招募了61所中学(n = 8992名符合条件的7年级学生),并将其随机分配到四个研究组之一:行为干预组、环境干预组、两种干预措施都采用组或两种干预措施都不采用组。

结果

主要结果是饮水量增加;次要结果包括学生对水和含糖饮料的知识及态度的变化,以及含糖饮料消费量的变化。与未接受任何干预的学生相比,接受至少一项干预的学生饮水量增加的几率更高(尽管无统计学意义)。接受两种干预措施相结合的学生的含糖饮料消费量有所下降(比值比:0.67;95%置信区间:0.55 - 0.082;P < 0.01)。

结论

联合干预措施在减少含糖饮料消费方面效果更佳。鉴于含糖饮料是超重和肥胖的一个关键促成因素,这一点值得关注。那又如何?据我们所知,这是澳大利亚第一项研究联合学校干预措施以专门促进青少年饮水并减少其含糖饮料消费的研究。该研究结果补充了有关实施多成分学校干预措施益处的证据,这些措施为解决超重和肥胖这一复杂公共卫生问题的现有干预措施增添了价值。

相似文献

1
The outcomes of Thirsty? Choose Water! Determining the effects of a behavioural and an environmental intervention on water and sugar sweetened beverage consumption in adolescents: A randomised controlled trial.口渴了?选喝水!确定行为和环境干预对青少年水和含糖饮料消费的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Health Promot J Austr. 2023 Apr;34(2):410-419. doi: 10.1002/hpja.623. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
2
Thirsty? Choose Water! Behavioural interventions and water stations in secondary schools a two-by-two factorial randomised controlled trial.口渴了?选择喝水!中学行为干预和水站的 2×2 析因随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Jun 26;18(1):788. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5685-1.
3
Environmental interventions to reduce the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and their effects on health.减少含糖饮料消费的环境干预措施及其对健康的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 12;6(6):CD012292. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012292.pub2.
4
Thirsty? Choose Water! Encouraging Secondary School Students to choose water over sugary drinks. A descriptive analysis of intervention components.口渴了?选择水!鼓励中学生选择水而不是含糖饮料。干预措施成分的描述性分析。
Health Promot J Austr. 2022 Jan;33(1):202-215. doi: 10.1002/hpja.479. Epub 2021 Mar 27.
5
A regional perspective to promoting water consumption in secondary school students.促进中学生饮水量的区域性视角。
Public Health Nutr. 2023 Nov;26(11):2526-2538. doi: 10.1017/S1368980023001313. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
6
A cluster randomised controlled trial of a secondary school intervention to reduce intake of sugar-sweetened beverages: Mid-intervention impact of switchURsip environmental strategies.一项针对中学干预措施以减少含糖饮料摄入量的群组随机对照试验:SwitchURsip 环境策略的中期干预影响。
Health Promot J Austr. 2022 Jan;33(1):176-186. doi: 10.1002/hpja.469. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
7
8
Sustaining Healthy Habits: The Enduring Impact of Combined School-Family Interventions on Consuming Sugar-Sweetened Beverages among Pilot Chinese Schoolchildren.维持健康习惯:综合学校-家庭干预对中国试点校学生饮用含糖饮料的持久影响。
Nutrients. 2024 Mar 26;16(7):953. doi: 10.3390/nu16070953.
9
Association Between Student Purchases of Beverages During the School Commute and In-School Consumption of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages, San Francisco Bay Area, 2013.2013年旧金山湾区学生在上学途中购买饮料与在校饮用含糖饮料之间的关联
Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 Dec 17;12:E220. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.150306.
10
A trial of a six-month sugar-sweetened beverage intervention in secondary schools from a socio-economically disadvantaged region in Australia.澳大利亚社会经济弱势地区中学为期六个月的含糖饮料干预试验。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2021 Dec;45(6):599-607. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.13159. Epub 2021 Nov 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Characterisation of At-Scale Community Health Interventions Aimed to Improve Healthy Eating Behaviour in Australia: A Rapid Review.旨在改善澳大利亚健康饮食行为的大规模社区健康干预措施的特征:一项快速综述。
Health Promot J Austr. 2025 Jul;36(3):e70061. doi: 10.1002/hpja.70061.
2
Effectiveness of an Intervention to Prevent Ultra-Processed Foods and Added Sugar in the First Year of Life: A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial in Brazil.一项预防生命第一年超加工食品和添加糖的干预措施的有效性:巴西的一项多中心随机对照试验
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2025 Feb;38(1):e70022. doi: 10.1111/jhn.70022.
3
A regional perspective to promoting water consumption in secondary school students.
促进中学生饮水量的区域性视角。
Public Health Nutr. 2023 Nov;26(11):2526-2538. doi: 10.1017/S1368980023001313. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
4
The Association between Maternal Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption and Infant/Toddler Added Sugar Intakes.母亲含糖饮料摄入与婴儿/幼儿添加糖摄入量之间的关联。
Nutrients. 2022 Oct 18;14(20):4359. doi: 10.3390/nu14204359.