• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于治疗不可切除肝细胞癌的全身治疗和经动脉放射性栓塞的价格分析

Price Analysis of Systemic Therapies and Transarterial Radioembolization for Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

作者信息

Williams Abimbola O, Anderson Nicholas, Gwon Young-Gwan, Wifler Wendy

机构信息

Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA 01752, USA;

出版信息

J Mark Access Health Policy. 2025 May 27;13(2):25. doi: 10.3390/jmahp13020025. eCollection 2025 Jun.

DOI:10.3390/jmahp13020025
PMID:40568386
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12194767/
Abstract

Systemic therapy (ST) and transarterial radioembolization (TARE) are widely used treatments for advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study quantified the significant variability in treatment costs for unresectable HCC from payer and provider perspectives. An Excel-based price analysis model was developed to estimate the prices of ST and TARE over a 21-month time horizon using 2015-2021 data. Median prices were calculated from Medicare Average Sales Price (ASP), provider Wholesale Acquisition Cost (WAC), and Average Wholesale Price (AWP). Sensitivity analyses evaluated price fluctuations associated with a ±10% variation in treatment duration. ST prices demonstrated marked variability across perspectives, with the median ASP at $175,625, WAC at $198,719, and AWP at $262,892. However, TARE prices were stable, ranging from $21,594 to $24,052. Sensitivity analyses revealed that treatment duration variation resulted in price changes of $35,000-$50,000 for ST, compared with ~$5000 for TARE. The variability in ST pricing was driven by treatment duration and drug-specific pricing mechanisms, particularly immunotherapy-based regimens, which accounted for the higher cost range. Conversely, TARE's consistent pricing is attributed to standardized procedural costs. Substantial variability exists in ST prices compared with the consistent costs of TARE, underscoring the economic advantage of TARE in appropriate clinical contexts.

摘要

全身治疗(ST)和经动脉放射性栓塞(TARE)是晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)广泛使用的治疗方法。本研究从支付方和医疗服务提供者的角度量化了不可切除HCC治疗成本的显著差异。开发了一个基于Excel的价格分析模型,使用2015 - 2021年的数据估计21个月时间范围内ST和TARE的价格。中位数价格根据医疗保险平均销售价格(ASP)、医疗服务提供者批发采购成本(WAC)和平均批发价格(AWP)计算得出。敏感性分析评估了与治疗持续时间±10%变化相关的价格波动。ST价格在不同角度呈现出显著差异,ASP中位数为175,625美元,WAC为198,719美元,AWP为262,892美元。然而,TARE价格稳定,在21,594美元至24,052美元之间。敏感性分析显示,治疗持续时间的变化导致ST价格变化35,000 - 50,000美元,而TARE约为5000美元。ST定价的差异是由治疗持续时间和特定药物定价机制驱动的,特别是基于免疫疗法的方案,这导致了更高的成本范围。相反,TARE价格的一致性归因于标准化的程序成本。与TARE的一致成本相比,ST价格存在很大差异,这突出了TARE在适当临床情况下的经济优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9911/12194767/34178b0d2690/jmahp-13-00025-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9911/12194767/a7a7058f61e4/jmahp-13-00025-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9911/12194767/34178b0d2690/jmahp-13-00025-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9911/12194767/a7a7058f61e4/jmahp-13-00025-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9911/12194767/34178b0d2690/jmahp-13-00025-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Price Analysis of Systemic Therapies and Transarterial Radioembolization for Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.用于治疗不可切除肝细胞癌的全身治疗和经动脉放射性栓塞的价格分析
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2025 May 27;13(2):25. doi: 10.3390/jmahp13020025. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Comparative effectiveness of different transarterial embolization therapies alone or in combination with local ablative or adjuvant systemic treatments for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.不同经动脉栓塞疗法单独或联合局部消融或辅助全身治疗对不可切除肝细胞癌的比较疗效:一项随机对照试验的网状Meta分析
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 21;12(9):e0184597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184597. eCollection 2017.
3
Outcomes of Transarterial Hepatic Embolization versus Yttrium-90 Radioembolization for Treatment of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma >7 cm.经动脉肝栓塞术与钇-90放射性栓塞术治疗直径>7 cm肝细胞癌患者的疗效比较
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2025 Mar 13. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2025.03.006.
4
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
5
Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Radioembolization Versus Chemoembolization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.不可切除肝细胞癌:放射性栓塞与化疗栓塞:系统评价与荟萃分析
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2016 Nov;39(11):1580-1588. doi: 10.1007/s00270-016-1426-y. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
6
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
7
The use of irinotecan, oxaliplatin and raltitrexed for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation.伊立替康、奥沙利铂和雷替曲塞用于治疗晚期结直肠癌:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 May;12(15):iii-ix, xi-162. doi: 10.3310/hta12150.
8
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
9
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.卡莫司汀植入剂与替莫唑胺治疗新诊断的高级别胶质瘤的有效性和成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. doi: 10.3310/hta11450.
10
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.

本文引用的文献

1
Combination makes strength: a narrative review of transarterial radioembolization plus immune checkpoint inhibitors for hepatocellular carcinoma.联合即力量:经动脉放射性栓塞联合免疫检查点抑制剂治疗肝细胞癌的叙事性综述。
Chin Clin Oncol. 2024 Oct;13(5):71. doi: 10.21037/cco-24-27. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
2
Efficacy of Selective Internal Radiation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Post-Incomplete Response to Chemoembolization.肝动脉化疗栓塞不完全反应后肝细胞癌的选择性内放射治疗疗效
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023 Dec 1;16(12):1676. doi: 10.3390/ph16121676.
3
Combination Therapy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors with Locoregional Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
免疫检查点抑制剂与局部区域治疗联合用于肝细胞癌的治疗
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Oct 20;15(20):5072. doi: 10.3390/cancers15205072.
4
Assessment of HCC response to Yttrium-90 radioembolization with gadoxetate disodium MRI: correlation with histopathology.钇-90 放射性栓塞治疗 HCC 反应的评估:与病理组织学的相关性。
Eur Radiol. 2022 Sep;32(9):6493-6503. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08732-4. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
5
Hepatobiliary Cancers, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.肝胆肿瘤,2.2021 年版,NCCN 肿瘤学临床实践指南。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021 May 1;19(5):541-565. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.0022.
6
Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing in Interventional Oncology: Cost Measurement and Cost Variability for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Therapies.介入肿瘤学中的时间驱动作业成本法:肝细胞癌治疗的成本计量和成本变异性。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2021 Aug;18(8):1095-1105. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.03.027. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
7
Transarterial radioembolization versus systemic treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma with macrovascular invasion: Analysis of the US National Cancer Database.经动脉放射性栓塞术与全身治疗对伴大血管侵犯的肝细胞癌的疗效比较:美国国家癌症数据库分析
J Nucl Med. 2021 Apr 9;62(12):1692-701. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.121.261954.
8
Yttrium-90 Radioembolization for the Treatment of Solitary, Unresectable HCC: The LEGACY Study.钇-90 放射性栓塞治疗不可切除单发 HCC:LEGACY 研究。
Hepatology. 2021 Nov;74(5):2342-2352. doi: 10.1002/hep.31819. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
9
First-Line Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab versus Sorafenib in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.一线阿替利珠单抗联合贝伐单抗与索拉非尼治疗肝细胞癌的成本效益分析
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Feb 24;13(5):931. doi: 10.3390/cancers13050931.
10
Anthropometric Reference Data for Children and Adults: United States, 2015-2018.2015 - 2018年美国儿童和成人人体测量参考数据
Vital Health Stat 3. 2021 Jan(36):1-44.