Fulay Aarohee P, Baylin Ana, Wolfson Julia A, Lee Joyce M, Martinez-Steele Euridice, Leung Cindy W
Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
J Nutr Sci. 2025 Jun 4;14:e41. doi: 10.1017/jns.2025.24. eCollection 2025.
Ultra-processed foods (UPFs) have negative health consequences. Food insecurity and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) are associated with higher UPF intake in U.S. adults, but this has not been examined in U.S. adolescents. This study assesses associations between food security status and SNAP participation with UPF intake in 3,067 adolescents aged 12-19 years with household incomes at or below 300% of the federal poverty line from the 2007-2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. UPF is defined using the Nova classification and measured as a percentage of daily total energy intake (TEI). High food security, marginal food security, or food insecurity status was determined through the U.S. Department of Agriculture's eighteen-item Household Food Security Survey. SNAP participation was deemed affirmative if the household reported receiving SNAP benefits in the last year. Multivariable linear regressions that controlled for TEI and sociodemographic covariates and accounted for the complex survey design examined associations between food insecurity and SNAP participation with UPF intake. In the sample, the prevalence of marginal food security was 15.9%, the prevalence of food insecurity was 33.8%, and the prevalence of SNAP participation was 36.5%. After multivariate adjustment, there were no significant differences in UPF intake by food security status. Adolescents participating in SNAP consumed 2.7% higher UPF intake (95% CI: 0.1%, 5.2%, p = 0.04) compared to adolescents not participating in SNAP. Among lower-income U.S. adolescents, SNAP participation but not food security status was associated with higher UPF intake. Programs and policies promoting the intake of more healthful, minimally processed foods should be strengthened.
超加工食品(UPF)对健康有负面影响。粮食不安全和补充营养援助计划(SNAP)与美国成年人较高的UPF摄入量相关,但在美国青少年中尚未对此进行研究。本研究评估了2007 - 2016年国家健康与营养检查调查中3067名年龄在12 - 19岁、家庭收入等于或低于联邦贫困线300%的青少年的粮食安全状况和SNAP参与情况与UPF摄入量之间的关联。UPF使用诺瓦分类法定义,并以每日总能量摄入量(TEI)的百分比来衡量。通过美国农业部的18项家庭粮食安全调查确定高粮食安全、边缘粮食安全或粮食不安全状况。如果家庭报告在过去一年中领取了SNAP福利,则认为其参与了SNAP。多变量线性回归控制了TEI和社会人口统计学协变量,并考虑了复杂的调查设计,以检验粮食不安全和SNAP参与情况与UPF摄入量之间的关联。在样本中,边缘粮食安全的患病率为15.9%,粮食不安全的患病率为33.8%,参与SNAP的患病率为36.5%。经过多变量调整后,按粮食安全状况划分的UPF摄入量没有显著差异。与未参与SNAP的青少年相比,参与SNAP的青少年的UPF摄入量高2.7%(95%置信区间:0.1%,5.2%,p = 0.04)。在美国低收入青少年中,SNAP参与情况而非粮食安全状况与较高的UPF摄入量相关。应加强促进摄入更健康、最少加工食品的计划和政策。