Suppr超能文献

食品不安全与美国父母和青少年对食品广告的看法和信任程度与超加工食品消费之间的关系。

Food Insecurity and the Association between Perceptions and Trust of Food Advertisements and Consumption of Ultra-Processed Foods among U.S. Parents and Adolescents.

机构信息

Division of Nutritional Sciences, College of Human Ecology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2022 May 7;14(9):1964. doi: 10.3390/nu14091964.

Abstract

Adolescents exposed to food and beverage advertisements (FBAs) typically low in nutrient density can be influenced in their food choices, eating behaviors, and health. This study examines the association between perceptions and trust of FBAs (key predictor) and the outcome of daily consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) in parent-adolescent dyads, with risk of food insecurity as a potential moderator. Cross-sectional data from the Family, Life, Activity, Sun, Health and Eating (FLASHE) study was used to test actor and partner effects using structural equation modeling. The final model was adjusted for parent sex and education level, and effects were compared between dyads at risk of food insecurity ( = 605) and dyads not at risk ( = 1008). In the unadjusted model, actor effects (parent: b = 0.23, = 0.001; adolescent b = 0.12, = 0.001) and parent-partner effects were found (b = 0.08, = 0.004). The final comparative model produced similar results for dyads not at risk of food insecurity (parent actor: b = 0.27, = 0.001; parent partner: b = 0.10, = 0.01; adolescent actor: b = 0.11, = 0.003). For dyads at risk of food insecurity, only actor effects were significant (parent: b = 0.22, = 0.001; adolescent: b = 0.11, = 0.013). These findings suggest that parents' favorability towards FBAs influence parent-adolescent unhealthy food consumption, and that this association is different when accounting for risk of food insecurity.

摘要

青少年接触低营养密度的食品和饮料广告(FBA)通常会影响他们的食物选择、饮食习惯和健康。本研究考察了父母和青少年对 FBA 的看法和信任(关键预测因素)与超加工食品(UPF)日常消费之间的关联,以粮食不安全风险为潜在调节因素。使用结构方程模型,利用家庭、生活、活动、阳光、健康和饮食(FLASHE)研究的横断面数据,检验了演员和伙伴效应。最终模型调整了父母的性别和教育水平,并比较了处于粮食不安全风险中的亲子对(n=605)和非风险亲子对(n=1008)的效应。在未调整的模型中,发现了演员效应(父母:b=0.23,p=0.001;青少年:b=0.12,p=0.001)和父母-伙伴效应(b=0.08,p=0.004)。对于非粮食不安全风险亲子对的最终比较模型,也产生了类似的结果(父母演员:b=0.27,p=0.001;父母伙伴:b=0.10,p=0.01;青少年演员:b=0.11,p=0.003)。对于处于粮食不安全风险中的亲子对,只有演员效应是显著的(父母:b=0.22,p=0.001;青少年:b=0.11,p=0.013)。这些发现表明,父母对 FBA 的青睐程度会影响亲子双方的不健康食物消费,而在考虑粮食不安全风险时,这种关联是不同的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验