Waldman Marcus R, Hepworth Katelyn, Johnson Jolene, Tourek Kelsey M, Jones Kelly J, Garcia Yaritza Estrada, Fritz Laura M, Siebler Abbey, Raikes Abbie
Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America.
Department of Health Promotion, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 26;20(6):e0324082. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324082. eCollection 2025.
Disparities in child development between groups of children arise early and reflect social inequities in early environments, geography, and other factors. To track and address these disparities, valid and reliable tools are needed that can be implemented at-scale and across populations. However, no population-level measures of child development appropriate for children from birth to age five years have been developed and validated in the United States to date. The Kidsights Measurement Tool (KMT) is a parent-report, population-level tool for children birth to age five years intended to track group-level differences in the developmental status across normative aspects of children's motor, cognitive, language, and social/emotional development. This study reports on validation of KMT as a feasible tool that can be implemented in large-scale surveys to track disparities in early childhood development. Using a sample of N = 5,001 initial parent reports residing in Nebraska and across the United States, we find strong evidence that the KMT can detect disparities in child development birth to age five, as indicated by expected criterion associations with parent education and mental health, as well as child's race and ethnicity. In addition, we found that the KMT is strongly associated with gold-standard direct observation instruments (i.e., the Bayley Scale of Infant Development and the Woodcock-Johnson) that measure similar developmental constructs both concurrently and one-year 12-24 months later. Finally, the KMT exhibits strong reliability even after controlling for age, and we find no evidence that measurement noninvariance threatens valid inferences about group difference. Taken together, our findings indicate that a parent-report measure can generate valid and useful estimates for tracking disparities in early child development at the population level.
不同儿童群体之间的发育差异在早期就已出现,反映了早期环境、地理位置及其他因素中的社会不平等现象。为了追踪和解决这些差异,需要能够大规模应用且适用于不同人群的有效且可靠的工具。然而,迄今为止,美国尚未开发并验证适用于从出生到五岁儿童的、针对儿童发育情况的群体层面测量方法。儿童视力测量工具(KMT)是一种由家长报告的、针对出生至五岁儿童的群体层面工具,旨在追踪儿童运动、认知、语言和社会/情感发育等规范方面发育状况的群体层面差异。本研究报告了KMT作为一种可行工具的验证情况,该工具可用于大规模调查,以追踪幼儿发育方面的差异。我们以居住在内布拉斯加州及全美的5001份家长初始报告为样本,发现有力证据表明,KMT能够检测出从出生到五岁儿童发育方面的差异,这体现在与家长教育程度、心理健康以及儿童种族和族裔的预期标准关联上。此外,我们发现KMT与金标准直接观察工具(即贝利婴儿发育量表和伍德库克-约翰逊测试)密切相关,这些工具在同时以及12至24个月后的一年时间里测量相似的发育结构。最后,即使在控制年龄因素后,KMT仍表现出很强的可靠性,而且我们没有发现测量非不变性会威胁到关于群体差异的有效推断的证据。综合来看,我们的研究结果表明,一种由家长报告的测量方法能够为追踪群体层面幼儿发育差异生成有效且有用的估计值。