Hortkoff Diego, Farago Paulo Vitor, Gomes João Carlos, Reis Alessandra, Gomes Giovana Mongruel
Department of Dentistry, State University of Ponta Grossa - UEPG, Ponta Grossa, Paraná, Brazil.
Department of Pharmacy, State University of Ponta Grossa - UEPG, Ponta Grossa, Paraná, Brazil.
J Dent. 2025 Oct;161:105932. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105932. Epub 2025 Jun 24.
This clinical trial aims to evaluate the bleaching efficacy and longevity of in-office bleaching after 4.5 years with or without ibuprofen/arginine desensitization.
Sixty-two patients, canines darker than A2 and in good general and oral health were selected and their hemi-arches randomized to receive an ibuprofen-arginine or placebo desensitizing gels before in-office dental bleaching. Two bleaching sessions (35% hydrogen peroxide gel; 1-week) were performed. Color change was evaluated using the Vita Classical, Vita Bleachedguide (ΔSGU), and Vita EasyShade spectrophotometer (ΔE, ΔE, WI) before dental bleaching, one month and 4.5 years after the bleaching procedure. Data was evaluated by paired t-test (α = 0.05). Long-term dental tooth sensitivity, patient satisfaction and desire for a new bleaching procedure were evaluated.
After 4.5 years, no significant difference in color change was found between the desensitizing and placebo sides (p > 0.05). A significant color rebound was observed (mean ΔSGU Classical 2.1 units, per-protocol analysis), though bleaching effects remained clinically relevant. Long-term tooth sensitivity was reported by 25.5% of participants. Patient satisfaction was moderate (mean VAS 6.7 ± 2.6), with 85.1% expressing interest in additional bleaching.
In-office dental bleaching showed sustained whitening effects after 4.5 years, despite a mild color rebound.
In-office bleaching maintains clinically acceptable whitening for over 4 years despite slight color rebound.
本临床试验旨在评估4.5年后诊室牙齿美白在使用或不使用布洛芬/精氨酸脱敏情况下的美白效果及持久性。
选取62例犬齿颜色深于A2且全身及口腔健康状况良好的患者,将其半口牙随机分组,在诊室牙齿美白前分别使用布洛芬-精氨酸脱敏凝胶或安慰剂脱敏凝胶。进行了两次美白疗程(35%过氧化氢凝胶;为期1周)。在牙齿美白前、美白后1个月和4.5年,使用Vita经典比色板、Vita Bleachedguide比色板(ΔSGU)和Vita EasyShade分光光度计(ΔE、ΔE、WI)评估颜色变化。数据采用配对t检验进行评估(α = 0.05)。评估长期牙齿敏感性、患者满意度以及对再次进行美白治疗的意愿。
4.5年后,脱敏组和安慰剂组之间的颜色变化无显著差异(p > 0.05)。观察到有明显的颜色反弹(按方案分析,平均ΔSGU经典比色板为2.1个单位),不过美白效果在临床上仍具有相关性。25.5%的参与者报告有长期牙齿敏感。患者满意度为中等(平均视觉模拟量表评分为6.7 ± 2.6),85.1%的患者表示有兴趣再次进行美白治疗。
尽管有轻微的颜色反弹,但诊室牙齿美白在4.5年后仍显示出持续的美白效果。
尽管有轻微的颜色反弹,诊室牙齿美白在4年多的时间里保持了临床上可接受的美白效果。