Effect of Filler Type, Content, and Silanization on the Flexural Strength, Elastic Modulus, Shore D Hardness, and Two-Body Wear of PAEK Compounds.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of filler type, filler content, and filler silanization on the flexural strength (FX), elastic modulus (E), shore D hardness (SDH), and two-body wear (2BW) of polyaryletherketone (PAEK) compounds. Specimens (40 wt% PEEK, 40 wt% PEK) with different filler types: 20 wt%: fumed silica (FS), calcium silicate (CS), feldspar (FP), magnesium silicate hydrate (MSH), no filler (NF); different filler content: 20, 25 or 30 wt% CS; different filler silanization: 20 wt% CS silanized with alkylsilane/aminosilane, FP silanized with methylsilane/ vinylsilane, no silanization; and PEEK (BioHPP) or PEEK (BioHPP plus) controls were fabricated and tested for FX, E, and SDH. Two-body wear (4 × 100,000 cycles, 50 N, 2.5 Hz) with composite resin antagonists was measured with PAEK (35 wt% PEEK, 35 wt% PEK, 30 wt% CS), PAEK (70 wt% PEEK, 30 wt% CS), PAEK (70 wt% PEEK, 25 wt% CS, 5 wt% FP), and PEEK controls. Data were analyzed with Kolmogorov-Smirnov-, Kruskal-Wallis-H-, post hoc Scheffé test, pairwise comparisons, Bonferroni correction, one-way ANOVA, and Spearman rho (α = 0.05). An abrasion area analysis was performed. Adding filler increased FX, E, and SDH, with CS and MSH showing the highest values for FX and E. Adding 30 wt% CS increased FX, E, and SDH compared with 20 wt%. Silanization with methylsilane increased FX, E, and SDH. Silanization with aminosilane increased FX and SDH. PEEK showed the lowest 2BW compared with all EPCs. No material losses were detected on the antagonists. PAEK compounds with 25 to 30 wt% CS increased FX and E compared to lower contents, no filler, or PEEK. Higher values of FX and E did not lead to lower 2BW.