Karakus Oguz Bilal, Doganer Merve Zeynep, Turhan İrem Yanarates, Cesur Tugce Demirci, Cakir Ecem Ozer, Yuksel Ayse Sena, Ozturk Didem Cek, Sevin Ilayda Barankoglu, Esin Ibrahim Selcuk, Rizvi Sakina J
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Trabzon Kanuni Training and Research Hospital, Trabzon, 61040, Turkey.
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Sancaktepe Şehit Prof. Dr. İlhan Varank Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Psychiatr Q. 2025 Jun 28. doi: 10.1007/s11126-025-10177-z.
The aim of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Dimensional Anhedonia Rating Scale (DARS-TR) in a clinical sample of adolescents, including those diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis and/or psychotic individuals (UHR/PSYC), and healthy controls (HC). The study included 63 cases diagnosed with MDD and 59 cases evaluated as UHR/PSYC, aged between 12-18 years, who were admitted to the child and adolescent psychiatry outpatient clinic. 58 age-matched healthy children constituted the control group. The construct validity of the scale was evaluated through factor analysis. Internal consistency was analyzed using Cronbach's α and McDonald's ω. For the assessment of convergent, concurrent, and divergent validity, the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS), the Behavioral Activation System/Behavioral Inhibition System Scale (BAS/BIS), and the Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R) were employed. There was a strong correlation between total DARS scores and SHAPS, BAS, and the anhedonia-related item of CDRS-R (p < 0.001). However, no significant relationship was found with BIS score. DARS items demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.92, McDonald's ω = 0.94). Factor analysis revealed that DARS items loaded onto four factors, explaining 73.07% of the total variance. Additionally, the four-factor structure demonstrated adequate fit. The findings obtained in the present study demonstrate that DARS-TR is a valid and reliable tool for comprehensively assessing state anhedonia in adolescent populations with MDD, UHR/PSYC, and non-psychiatric individuals.
本研究旨在评估青少年临床样本中土耳其语版维度性快感缺乏评定量表(DARS-TR)的有效性和可靠性,该样本包括被诊断为重度抑郁症(MDD)的青少年、处于精神病超高风险和/或患有精神病的个体(UHR/PSYC)以及健康对照(HC)。该研究纳入了63例被诊断为MDD的病例和59例被评估为UHR/PSYC的病例,年龄在12至18岁之间,他们均就诊于儿童和青少年精神病门诊。58名年龄匹配的健康儿童构成了对照组。通过因子分析评估量表的结构效度。使用Cronbach's α和McDonald's ω分析内部一致性。为了评估收敛效度、同时效度和区分效度,采用了斯奈斯-汉密尔顿愉悦量表(SHAPS)、行为激活系统/行为抑制系统量表(BAS/BIS)以及儿童抑郁评定量表修订版(CDRS-R)。DARS总分与SHAPS、BAS以及CDRS-R中与快感缺乏相关的项目之间存在强相关性(p < 0.001)。然而,未发现与BIS得分有显著关系。DARS各项目表现出优异的内部一致性(Cronbach's α = 0.92,McDonald's ω = 0.94)。因子分析表明,DARS各项目加载到四个因子上,解释了总方差的73.07%。此外,四因子结构显示拟合良好。本研究获得的结果表明,DARS-TR是全面评估患有MDD、UHR/PSYC的青少年人群以及非精神疾病个体状态性快感缺乏的有效且可靠的工具。