Auxier Jennifer
School of Nursing, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Nurs Inq. 2025 Jul;32(3):e70041. doi: 10.1111/nin.70041.
This study examines current assumptions of digital transformation research in the perinatal context and constructs a nursing model through a critical interpretive synthesis. Perinatal digital transformation research is discussed and found to be lacking grounding in nursing concepts; nursing theory was integrated by examining data through the lenses of Woman- and Family-Centered Care (Person-centered Perinatal Care) and by applying Donabedian's Frame of quality assurance into the conceptual matrix. Here, iterative data collection occurred, initially through a scoping review examining the nature and range of perinatal digital health systems. Purposive sampling of empirical studies was conducted to saturate the data pool with all four attributes of patient engagement (access, personalization, therapeutic alliance, and commitment). Participatory action theory supported an abductive stage of analysis and informed pragmatic construction of the model. The model encompasses: (1) person-centered intervention mapping; (2) integration of process evaluation through stakeholder and user consultation; and (3) co-creation during real-life testing. The steps of the model are constructed to align with best practices in participatory action research, while holding nursing models as the foundational theoretical basis. This grounding in nursing theory will support a nursing lens for future action research related to the development of perinatal digital health systems.
本研究审视了围产期背景下数字转型研究的当前假设,并通过批判性解释性综合构建了一个护理模型。文中讨论了围产期数字转型研究,发现其缺乏护理概念的基础;通过以妇女和家庭为中心的护理(以患者为中心的围产期护理)视角审视数据,并将唐纳贝迪安的质量保证框架应用于概念矩阵,从而整合了护理理论。在此,进行了迭代数据收集,最初是通过一项范围审查来考察围产期数字健康系统的性质和范围。对实证研究进行了目的抽样,以使数据池涵盖患者参与的所有四个属性(可及性、个性化、治疗联盟和承诺)。参与式行动理论支持了归纳分析阶段,并为模型的务实构建提供了依据。该模型包括:(1)以患者为中心的干预映射;(2)通过利益相关者和用户咨询整合过程评估;以及(3)在实际测试期间共同创造。该模型的步骤构建得与参与式行动研究的最佳实践相一致,同时将护理模型作为基础理论依据。这种基于护理理论的基础将为未来与围产期数字健康系统开发相关的行动研究提供护理视角。