• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过协同设计重新思考2S/LGBTQI+群体的粮食安全:一项研究方案

Rethinking 2S/LGBTQI+ food security with co-design: a study protocol.

作者信息

Thériault Joanie, Joy Phillip, Boudhraâ Sana, Gao Min

机构信息

Department of Occupational Therapy, VITAM Centre de recherche en santé durable - CIUSSS Capitale-Nationale, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada.

Applied Human Nutrition, Mount Saint-Vincent University, Halifax, NSW, Canada.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 13;13:1558700. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1558700. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1558700
PMID:40584543
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12202626/
Abstract

CONTEXT

In Canada, recent statistics show that 8.7 million Canadians face food insecurity which disproportionately affects people of the 2S/LGBTQI+ communities. Food insecurity is intersectional: people belonging to one or more marginalized groups, like 2S/LGBTQI+, are at greater risk. Moreover, food security resources can pose due to the stigma and cis-heterosexism associated with the religious basis of some of these resources. Exploring ways to partner up with and for 2S/LGBTQI+ communities and food security organizations in order to reflect and imagine a new service model is a promising avenue to tackle the social injustice of food insecurity.

OBJECTIVES

This research protocol presents the activities and strategies of a co-design study aiming to enhance safety and inclusivity of food security services with and for 2S/LGBTQI+ individuals. The team also seeks to identify how to improve food security services with and for 2S/LGBTQI+ communities and to co-create a prototype service model representing safe and inclusive services that communities and food security stakeholders can utilize to make improvements in that direction.

METHODS

This protocol is based on a co-design methodology inspired by design thinking. The project will address desirability, feasibility, and viability - what is desirable, acceptable, achievable and sustainable in a prototype service model for 2S/LGBTQI+ individuals accessing food security services, organizations, and workers/volunteers. Participants will take part in seven online co-design workshops. Facilitators will guide the participants in offering free commentary, generating thoughts, and sharing new ideas along with reflective questions regarding a provisional prototype of the service model and framework principles. Discussions will be recorded for analysis purposes along with visual and textual content generated through the web-based collaborative tool. The data will be subjected to a qualitative thematic analysis.

CONCLUSION

This protocol recognizes and values the experience and knowledge of 2S/LGBTQI+ communities and illustrates participatory involvement to improve food security. It is expected that this protocol inspires researchers and organizations to partner up and explore ways to use, replicate, and improve or adapt the approach. Future results may find interest and usefulness in other 2S/LGBTQI+ communities and food security organizations.

摘要

背景

在加拿大,近期统计数据显示,870万加拿大人面临粮食不安全问题,这对2S/LGBTQI+群体的影响尤为严重。粮食不安全具有交叉性:属于一个或多个边缘化群体(如2S/LGBTQI+)的人面临的风险更大。此外,由于这些资源的宗教基础所带来的耻辱感和顺性别异性恋至上主义,粮食安全资源可能会受到影响。探索与2S/LGBTQI+群体以及粮食安全组织合作的方式,以反映并设想一种新的服务模式,是解决粮食不安全这一社会不公问题的一条有前景的途径。

目标

本研究方案介绍了一项协同设计研究的活动和策略,旨在提高粮食安全服务对2S/LGBTQI+个体的安全性和包容性。该团队还寻求确定如何改进面向2S/LGBTQI+群体的粮食安全服务,并共同创建一个原型服务模式,代表安全且包容的服务,社区和粮食安全利益相关者可利用该模式朝着这个方向进行改进。

方法

本方案基于受设计思维启发的协同设计方法。该项目将关注可取性、可行性和可持续性——在面向2S/LGBTQI+个体获取粮食安全服务、组织以及工作人员/志愿者的原型服务模式中,什么是可取的、可接受的、可实现的和可持续的。参与者将参加七次在线协同设计研讨会。主持人将引导参与者提供自由评论、产生想法、分享新观点,以及就服务模式和框架原则的临时原型提出反思性问题。讨论将被记录下来用于分析,同时还会记录通过基于网络的协作工具生成的视觉和文本内容。数据将进行定性主题分析。

结论

本方案认可并重视2S/LGBTQI+群体的经验和知识,并展示了参与式方法以改善粮食安全。预计本方案将激励研究人员和组织合作,探索使用、复制、改进或调整该方法的途径。未来的结果可能会引起其他2S/LGBTQI+群体和粮食安全组织的兴趣并具有实用性。

相似文献

1
Rethinking 2S/LGBTQI+ food security with co-design: a study protocol.通过协同设计重新思考2S/LGBTQI+群体的粮食安全:一项研究方案
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 13;13:1558700. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1558700. eCollection 2025.
2
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
4
Stigma Management Strategies of Autistic Social Media Users.自闭症社交媒体用户的污名管理策略
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):273-282. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0095. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
6
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
7
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对土壤传播蠕虫群体药物给药的看法:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.
8
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
9
Perceptions and experiences of the prevention, detection, and management of postpartum haemorrhage: a qualitative evidence synthesis.预防、检测和管理产后出血的认知和经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 27;11(11):CD013795. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013795.pub2.
10
"Just Ask What Support We Need": Autistic Adults' Feedback on Social Skills Training.“只需询问我们需要什么支持”:成年自闭症患者对社交技能培训的反馈
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):283-292. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0136. eCollection 2025 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Perceived Discrimination Among Food Pantry Clients in Massachusetts.马萨诸塞州食品发放处客户感知的歧视
Prev Chronic Dis. 2024 Sep 12;21:E70. doi: 10.5888/pcd21.240009.
2
Exploring Food Security and Mental Health Among Street-Involved Canadian 2S/LGBTQI+ Youth: A Review of the Literature.探索加拿大街头流浪的2S/LGBTQI+青年的食品安全与心理健康:文献综述
Can J Diet Pract Res. 2024 Dec 1;85(4):418-423. doi: 10.3148/cjdpr-2024-011. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
3
Queering food security research: A critical analysis of 2SLGBTQ+ People's experiences of food insecurity in Toronto during the COVID-19 pandemic.
使粮食安全研究变得酷儿化:对2SLGBTQ+群体在新冠疫情期间于多伦多经历粮食不安全状况的批判性分析
Soc Sci Med. 2024 Mar;345:116709. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116709. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
4
The role of sexual orientation in the relationships among food insecurity, food literacy, and disordered eating.性取向在食物不安全、食物素养和饮食失调之间关系中的作用。
Eat Behav. 2023 Aug;50:101757. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2023.101757. Epub 2023 May 31.
5
LGBTQ+ food insufficiency in New England.新英格兰地区 LGBTQ+ 群体的食物匮乏问题。
Agric Human Values. 2022 Dec 9:1-16. doi: 10.1007/s10460-022-10403-5.
6
User Experience of the Co-design Research Approach in eHealth: Activity Analysis With the Course-of-Action Framework.电子健康领域协同设计研究方法的用户体验:基于行动过程框架的活动分析
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Aug 9;9(3):e35577. doi: 10.2196/35577.
7
Human-Centered Design Approaches in Digital Mental Health Interventions: Exploratory Mapping Review.数字心理健康干预中的以人为本设计方法:探索性映射综述
JMIR Ment Health. 2022 Jun 7;9(6):e35591. doi: 10.2196/35591.
8
Sexual orientation-based disparities in food security among adults in the United States: results from the 2003-2016 NHANES.基于性取向的美国成年人粮食安全差异:来自 2003-2016 年 NHANES 的结果。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2021 Dec 1;114(6):2006-2016. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab290.
9
Food insecurity, food skills, health literacy and food preparation activities among young Canadian adults: a cross-sectional analysis.加拿大年轻成年人的食物不安全、食物技能、健康素养和食物准备活动:一项横断面分析。
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Jun;24(9):2377-2387. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021000719. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
10
Examining Patterns of Food Bank Use Over Twenty-Five Years in Vancouver, Canada.审视加拿大温哥华25年来食品银行的使用模式。
Voluntas. 2020;31(5):853-869. doi: 10.1007/s11266-018-0039-2. Epub 2018 Oct 1.