Suppr超能文献

早期使用利妥昔单抗治疗原发性干燥综合征的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Efficacy of early rituximab treatment in primary Sjögren's syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Shahdadian Mohammad, Saghiri Mohammad Ali, Capitle Eugenio

机构信息

Department of Innovation in Health, Dentine Vaccine LLC, Newark, NJ, USA.

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Rutgers School of Dental Medicine, Newark, NJ, USA.

出版信息

J Rheum Dis. 2025 Jul 1;32(3):211-224. doi: 10.4078/jrd.2024.0149. Epub 2025 Feb 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess Rituximab (RTX)'s efficacy and safety in primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS), particularly how treatment timing influences outcomes.

METHODS

The study included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental studies evaluating RTX in pSS patients, focusing on disease activity (European League Against Rheumatism Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index [ESSDAI] score) and adverse events (AEs). Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Library databases up to July 2024. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 (RoB 2) and Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklists. Meta-analysis was performed in Stata 17 with a random-effects model, reporting mean differences in ESSDAI and I² for heterogeneity.

RESULTS

From 555 articles, 15 studies were included (4 RCTs and 11 quasi-experimental studies). RCT meta-analysis showed a mean difference of 0.09 (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.43, 0.61), indicating no significant RTX efficacy. In contrast, the pooled quasi-experimental analysis revealed a mean difference of -4.36 (95% CI -5.83, -2.89), suggesting a significant reduction in disease activity. Meta-regression indicated no significant correlation between RTX efficacy and mean disease duration. Subgroup analysis of disease duration (under vs. over 60 months) showed no significant difference. Safety assessment indicated no significant differences in AEs between RTX and placebo in RCTs. In quasi-experimental studies, infusion reactions and infections were the most common AEs, with serious infections being the most severe.

CONCLUSION

RTX did not show significant improvement in RCTs. However, RTX significantly reduced pSS activity at week 24 or month 6 following treatment, based on quasi-experimental studies. We found no significant correlation between RTX efficacy and disease duration.

摘要

目的

本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估利妥昔单抗(RTX)在原发性干燥综合征(pSS)中的疗效和安全性,特别是治疗时机如何影响治疗结果。

方法

该研究纳入了评估RTX治疗pSS患者的随机对照试验(RCT)和准实验研究,重点关注疾病活动度(欧洲抗风湿病联盟干燥综合征疾病活动指数[ESSDAI]评分)和不良事件(AE)。截至2024年7月,在MEDLINE、Embase、SCOPUS和Cochrane图书馆数据库中进行了检索。使用Cochrane偏倚风险2.0(RoB 2)和乔安娜·布里格斯研究所(JBI)检查表评估偏倚风险。在Stata 17中采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,报告ESSDAI的平均差异和异质性的I²。

结果

从555篇文章中,纳入了15项研究(4项RCT和11项准实验研究)。RCT荟萃分析显示平均差异为0.09(95%置信区间[CI] -0.43,0.61),表明RTX疗效无显著差异。相比之下,汇总的准实验分析显示平均差异为-4.36(95% CI -5.83,-2.89),表明疾病活动度显著降低。荟萃回归表明RTX疗效与平均病程之间无显著相关性。病程亚组分析(60个月以下与60个月以上)显示无显著差异。安全性评估表明,RCT中RTX与安慰剂之间的AE无显著差异。在准实验研究中,输注反应和感染是最常见的AE,严重感染最为严重。

结论

RTX在RCT中未显示出显著改善。然而,根据准实验研究,RTX在治疗后第24周或第6个月显著降低了pSS活动度。我们发现RTX疗效与病程之间无显著相关性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e97a/12202284/621647660e54/jrd-32-3-211-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验