• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

68个国家民众对科学家及其在社会中所扮演角色的信任度。

Trust in scientists and their role in society across 68 countries.

作者信息

Cologna Viktoria, Mede Niels G, Berger Sebastian, Besley John, Brick Cameron, Joubert Marina, Maibach Edward W, Mihelj Sabina, Oreskes Naomi, Schäfer Mike S, van der Linden Sander, Abdul Aziz Nor Izzatina, Abdulsalam Suleiman, Shamsi Nurulaini Abu, Aczel Balazs, Adinugroho Indro, Alabrese Eleonora, Aldoh Alaa, Alfano Mark, Ali Innocent Mbulli, Alsobay Mohammed, Altenmüller Marlene, Alvarez R Michael, Amoako Richard, Amollo Tabitha, Ansah Patrick, Apriliawati Denisa, Azevedo Flavio, Bajrami Ani, Bardhan Ronita, Bati Keagile, Bertsou Eri, Betsch Cornelia, Bhatiya Apurav Yash, Bhui Rahul, Białobrzeska Olga, Bilewicz Michał, Bouguettaya Ayoub, Breeden Katherine, Bret Amélie, Buchel Ondrej, Cabrera-Álvarez Pablo, Cagnoli Federica, Calero Valdez André, Callaghan Timothy, Cases Rizza Kaye, Çoksan Sami, Czarnek Gabriela, De Peuter Steven, Debnath Ramit, Delouvée Sylvain, Di Stefano Lucia, Díaz-Catalán Celia, Doell Kimberly C, Dohle Simone, Douglas Karen M, Dries Charlotte, Dubrov Dmitrii, Dzimińska Małgorzata, Ecker Ullrich K H, Elbaek Christian T, Elsherif Mahmoud, Enke Benjamin, Etienne Tom W, Facciani Matthew, Fage-Butler Antoinette, Faisal Md Zaki, Fan Xiaoli, Farhart Christina, Feldhaus Christoph, Ferreira Marinus, Feuerriegel Stefan, Fischer Helen, Freundt Jana, Friese Malte, Fuglsang Simon, Gallyamova Albina, Garrido-Vásquez Patricia, Garrido Vásquez Mauricio E, Gatua Winfred, Genschow Oliver, Ghasemi Omid, Gkinopoulos Theofilos, Gloor Jamie L, Goddard Ellen, Gollwitzer Mario, González-Brambila Claudia, Gordon Hazel, Grigoryev Dmitry, Grimshaw Gina M, Guenther Lars, Haarstad Håvard, Harari Dana, Hawkins Lelia N, Hensel Przemysław, Hernández-Mondragón Alma Cristal, Herziger Atar, Huang Guanxiong, Huff Markus, Hurley Mairéad, Ibadildin Nygmet, Ishibashi Maho, Islam Mohammad Tarikul, Jeddi Younes, Jin Tao, Jones Charlotte A, Jungkunz Sebastian, Jurgiel Dominika, Kabdulkair Zhangir, Kao Jo-Ju, Kavassalis Sarah, Kerr John R, Kitsa Mariana, Klabíková Rábová Tereza, Klein Olivier, Koh Hoyoun, Koivula Aki, Kojan Lilian, Komyaginskaya Elizaveta, König Laura, Koppel Lina, Koren Nobre Cavalcante Kochav, Kosachenko Alexandra, Kotcher John, Kranz Laura S, Krishnan Pradeep, Kristiansen Silje, Krouwel André, Kuppens Toon, Kyza Eleni A, Lamm Claus, Lantian Anthony, Lazić Aleksandra, Lecuona Oscar, Légal Jean-Baptiste, Leviston Zoe, Levy Neil, Lindkvist Amanda M, Lits Grégoire, Löschel Andreas, López Ortega Alberto, Lopez-Villavicencio Carlos, Lou Nigel Mantou, Lucas Chloe H, Lunz-Trujillo Kristin, Marques Mathew D, Mayer Sabrina J, McKay Ryan, Mercier Hugo, Metag Julia, Milfont Taciano L, Miller Joanne M, Mitkidis Panagiotis, Monge-Rodríguez Fredy, Motta Matt, Mudra Iryna, Muršič Zarja, Namutebi Jennifer, Newman Eryn J, Nitschke Jonas P, Ntui Ntui-Njock Vincent, Nwogwugwu Daniel, Ostermann Thomas, Otterbring Tobias, Palmer-Hague Jaime, Pantazi Myrto, Pärnamets Philip, Parra Saiani Paolo, Paruzel-Czachura Mariola, Parzuchowski Michal, Pavlov Yuri G, Pearson Adam R, Penner Myron A, Pennington Charlotte R, Petkanopoulou Katerina, Petrović Marija B, Pfänder Jan, Pisareva Dinara, Ploszaj Adam, Poliaková Karolína, Pronizius Ekaterina, Pypno-Blajda Katarzyna, Quiñones Diwa Malaya A, Räsänen Pekka, Rauchfleisch Adrian, Rebitschek Felix G, Refojo Seronero Cintia, Rêgo Gabriel, Reynolds James P, Roche Joseph, Rödder Simone, Röer Jan Philipp, Ross Robert M, Ruin Isabelle, Santos Osvaldo, Santos Ricardo R, Schmid Philipp, Schulreich Stefan, Scoggins Bermond, Sharaf Amena, Sheria Nfundiko Justin, Shuckburgh Emily, Six Johan, Solak Nevin, Späth Leonhard, Spruyt Bram, Standaert Olivier, Stanley Samantha K, Storms Gert, Strahm Noel, Syropoulos Stylianos, Szaszi Barnabas, Szumowska Ewa, Tanaka Mikihito, Teran-Escobar Claudia, Todorova Boryana, Toko Abdoul Kafid, Tokrri Renata, Toribio-Florez Daniel, Tsakiris Manos, Tyrala Michael, Uluğ Özden Melis, Uzoma Ijeoma Chinwe, van Noord Jochem, Varda Christiana, Verheyen Steven, Vilares Iris, Vlasceanu Madalina, von Bubnoff Andreas, Walker Iain, Warwas Izabela, Weber Marcel, Weninger Tim, Westfal Mareike, Wintterlin Florian, Wojcik Adrian Dominik, Xia Ziqian, Xie Jinliang, Zegler-Poleska Ewa, Zenklusen Amber, Zwaan Rolf A

机构信息

Department of the History of Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Department of Communication and Media Research, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Apr;9(4):713-730. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-02090-5. Epub 2025 Jan 20.

DOI:10.1038/s41562-024-02090-5
PMID:39833424
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7617525/
Abstract

Science is crucial for evidence-based decision-making. Public trust in scientists can help decision makers act on the basis of the best available evidence, especially during crises. However, in recent years the epistemic authority of science has been challenged, causing concerns about low public trust in scientists. We interrogated these concerns with a preregistered 68-country survey of 71,922 respondents and found that in most countries, most people trust scientists and agree that scientists should engage more in society and policymaking. We found variations between and within countries, which we explain with individual- and country-level variables, including political orientation. While there is no widespread lack of trust in scientists, we cannot discount the concern that lack of trust in scientists by even a small minority may affect considerations of scientific evidence in policymaking. These findings have implications for scientists and policymakers seeking to maintain and increase trust in scientists.

摘要

科学对于基于证据的决策至关重要。公众对科学家的信任有助于决策者依据现有的最佳证据采取行动,尤其是在危机期间。然而,近年来科学的认知权威受到了挑战,引发了对公众对科学家信任度低的担忧。我们通过一项对71922名受访者进行的、在68个国家预先登记的调查来探究这些担忧,发现在大多数国家,大多数人信任科学家,并同意科学家应该更多地参与社会和政策制定。我们发现了国家之间和国家内部的差异,并用包括政治倾向在内的个人和国家层面的变量来解释这些差异。虽然不存在对科学家普遍缺乏信任的情况,但我们不能忽视这样一种担忧,即即使是一小部分人对科学家缺乏信任,也可能会影响政策制定中对科学证据的考量。这些发现对于寻求维持和增强公众对科学家信任的科学家和政策制定者具有启示意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb5b/12018269/9689be0c80aa/41562_2024_2090_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb5b/12018269/af9d073a82e4/41562_2024_2090_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb5b/12018269/7f921fd21404/41562_2024_2090_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb5b/12018269/013718c06fdc/41562_2024_2090_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb5b/12018269/677d31e5803a/41562_2024_2090_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb5b/12018269/9689be0c80aa/41562_2024_2090_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb5b/12018269/af9d073a82e4/41562_2024_2090_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb5b/12018269/7f921fd21404/41562_2024_2090_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb5b/12018269/013718c06fdc/41562_2024_2090_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb5b/12018269/677d31e5803a/41562_2024_2090_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb5b/12018269/9689be0c80aa/41562_2024_2090_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Trust in scientists and their role in society across 68 countries.68个国家民众对科学家及其在社会中所扮演角色的信任度。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Apr;9(4):713-730. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-02090-5. Epub 2025 Jan 20.
2
New trends in science communication fostering evidence-informed policymaking.促进基于证据的决策制定的科学传播新趋势。
Open Res Eur. 2023 Oct 24;2:78. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.14769.2. eCollection 2022.
3
Assessing changes in US public trust in science amid the COVID-19 pandemic.评估 COVID-19 大流行期间美国公众对科学的信任变化。
Public Health. 2020 Jun;183:122-125. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.05.004. Epub 2020 May 13.
4
Threatening experts: Correlates of viewing scientists as a social threat.威胁专家:将科学家视为社会威胁的相关因素。
Public Underst Sci. 2024 Jan;33(1):88-104. doi: 10.1177/09636625231183115. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
5
An attack on science? Media use, trust in scientists, and perceptions of global warming.对科学的攻击?媒体使用、对科学家的信任以及对全球变暖的认知。
Public Underst Sci. 2014 Oct;23(7):866-83. doi: 10.1177/0963662513480091. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
6
Exploring health researchers' perceptions of policymaking in Argentina: a qualitative study.探索阿根廷卫生研究人员对政策制定的看法:一项定性研究。
Health Policy Plan. 2014 Sep;29 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii40-9. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czu071.
7
A desire for authoritative science? How citizens' informational needs and epistemic beliefs shaped their views of science, news, and policymaking in the COVID-19 pandemic.对权威科学的渴望?公民的信息需求和认识论信念如何塑造了他们在 COVID-19 大流行期间对科学、新闻和决策的看法。
Public Underst Sci. 2021 Jul;30(5):496-514. doi: 10.1177/09636625211005334. Epub 2021 Apr 10.
8
Perceptions of science, science communication, and climate change attitudes in 68 countries - the TISP dataset.68个国家对科学、科学传播及气候变化态度的认知——TISP数据集
Sci Data. 2025 Jan 20;12(1):114. doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-04100-7.
9
"I think all of us should have […] much better training in ethics." Ethical challenges in policy making during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results from an interview study with Swiss policy makers and scientists.“我认为我们所有人都应该 […] 在伦理道德方面接受更好的培训。” 新冠疫情期间政策制定中的伦理挑战:对瑞士政策制定者和科学家的访谈研究结果。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Nov 15;25(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01132-x.
10
'Follow the science': Popular trust in scientific experts during the coronavirus pandemic.“遵循科学”:新冠疫情期间公众对科学专家的信任
Public Underst Sci. 2025 Jan;34(1):2-18. doi: 10.1177/09636625241253968. Epub 2024 Jun 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Anti-science and the science community.反科学与科学界。
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2025 Aug 13. doi: 10.1038/s41579-025-01231-5.
2
How scientists can contribute to the social movements essential to protecting climate and nature.科学家如何为保护气候和自然所必需的社会运动做出贡献。
NPJ Clim Action. 2025;4(1):72. doi: 10.1038/s44168-025-00268-9. Epub 2025 Jul 31.
3
Commentary: Industry collaboration: A call for 'industry literacy' - a commentary on Bourgaize et al. (2025).评论:行业合作:呼吁“行业素养”——对布尔盖兹等人(2025年)的评论

本文引用的文献

1
Perceptions of science, science communication, and climate change attitudes in 68 countries - the TISP dataset.68个国家对科学、科学传播及气候变化态度的认知——TISP数据集
Sci Data. 2025 Jan 20;12(1):114. doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-04100-7.
2
Big-team science does not guarantee generalizability.大型团队科学并不能保证可推广性。
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Jun;8(6):1053-1056. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-01902-y. Epub 2024 Jun 5.
3
Addressing climate change with behavioral science: A global intervention tournament in 63 countries.用行为科学应对气候变化:63 个国家的全球干预锦标赛。
Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2025 Sep;30(3):285-288. doi: 10.1111/camh.70017. Epub 2025 Jul 27.
4
A new dimension of simplified science communication: the easiness effect of science popularization in animated video abstracts.简化科学传播的新维度:动画视频摘要中科学普及的易懂性效应。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 2;16:1584695. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1584695. eCollection 2025.
5
Extreme weather event attribution predicts climate policy support across the world.极端天气事件归因预测全球气候政策支持情况。
Nat Clim Chang. 2025;15(7):725-735. doi: 10.1038/s41558-025-02372-4. Epub 2025 Jul 1.
6
An agenda for science communication research and practice.科学传播研究与实践议程。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jul 8;122(27):e2400932122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2400932122. Epub 2025 Jun 30.
7
Journals Operating Predatory Practices Are Systematically Eroding the Science Ethos: A Gate and Code Strategy to Minimise Their Operating Space and Restore Research Best Practice.采用掠夺性做法的期刊正在系统性地侵蚀科学精神:一种减少其运营空间并恢复研究最佳实践的把关与编码策略。
Microb Biotechnol. 2025 Jun;18(6):e70180. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.70180.
8
Fostering trustworthy information: countering disinformation when there are no bare facts.培育可靠信息:在缺乏确凿事实时应对虚假信息
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Jun 18;12(6):250654. doi: 10.1098/rsos.250654. eCollection 2025 Jun.
9
Invitation appeals and STEM academic scientists research participation: Findings from six survey experiments.邀请吸引力与STEM领域学术科学家的研究参与度:六项调查实验的结果
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 17;20(6):e0326331. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326331. eCollection 2025.
10
Childhood Influenza Vaccination Is Not a Priority for Parents: A National, Cross-Sectional Survey of Barriers to Childhood Influenza Vaccination in Australia.儿童流感疫苗接种并非家长的优先选择:一项关于澳大利亚儿童流感疫苗接种障碍的全国性横断面调查。
Vaccines (Basel). 2025 May 19;13(5):540. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13050540.
Sci Adv. 2024 Feb 9;10(6):eadj5778. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adj5778. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
4
The association between political orientation and political knowledge in 45 nations.45个国家中政治倾向与政治知识之间的关联。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 31;14(1):2590. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53114-z.
5
What are you assessing when you measure "trust" in scientists with a direct measure?当你使用直接测量来衡量公众对科学家的“信任”时,你在评估什么?
Public Underst Sci. 2023 Aug;32(6):709-726. doi: 10.1177/09636625231161302. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
6
Polarization of public trust in scientists between 1978 and 2018 .1978 年至 2018 年公众对科学家信任的极化。
Politics Life Sci. 2023 Mar;41(1):45-54. doi: 10.1017/pls.2021.18.
7
The Benefits, Barriers, and Risks of Big-Team Science.大团队科学的益处、障碍和风险。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2023 May;18(3):607-623. doi: 10.1177/17456916221082970. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
8
Time to end parachute science.是时候终结“降落伞科学”了。
PLoS Med. 2022 Sep 6;19(9):e1004099. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004099. eCollection 2022 Sep.
9
Conspiracy beliefs and science rejection.阴谋论信仰与科学排斥
Curr Opin Psychol. 2022 Aug;46:101392. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101392. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
10
An anchor in troubled times: Trust in science before and within the COVID-19 pandemic.疫情时期的定海神针:新冠疫情之前和期间对科学的信任。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 9;17(2):e0262823. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262823. eCollection 2022.