Malawige Amila Suranga, Aminde Leopold Ndemnge, Weeratunga Gayathri Udeshika, Weerakoon Kumudu, Veerman Jacob Lennert
Public Health and Economics Modelling Group, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, No. 1, Parklands Drive, Southport, Queensland 4215, Australia.
Directorate of Policy Analysis and Development, Department of Health, Ministry of Health, No. 385, Rev. Baddegama Wimalawansa Thero Mawatha, Colombo 10, 01000, Sri Lanka.
Health Policy Plan. 2025 Aug 18;40(7):780-804. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaf036.
Alcohol consumption poses significant public health challenges globally, with low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) experiencing a substantial burden from alcohol-related harm. However, the effectiveness of interventions to control alcohol consumption in LMICs remains understudied. This paper aims to investigate the effectiveness of alcohol regulatory interventions adopted in LMICs. A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Web of Science was conducted on 10 August 2024. The search strategy included terms related to regulatory interventions and their impact on alcohol consumption, health, and other related outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed using the National Institutes of Health, Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care checklist, ISPOR-SDMD checklist, and CASP quality assessment tools, and a narrative synthesis was performed to summarize the review findings. Of the 169 full texts screened, 62 studies were included in this review. Most of the studies were conducted in upper-middle-income countries (n = 48, 77%), seven were from lower-middle-income countries, one from a low-income country, and others were combinations of the above. Sixty per cent of the included studies were of good quality. In terms of World Health Organization alcohol policy domains, 18 studies focused on restriction of physical availability, 11 on pricing, 1 on marketing, 21 on drink driving, and 11 on a combination of all policy domains. Alcohol consumption-related outcomes were reported in 26 studies, while health and other outcomes were reported in 25 and 14 studies, respectively. Restrictions on physical availability of alcohol were largely effective across all outcomes, while the pricing policy domain consistently demonstrated effectiveness in reducing alcohol consumption. The scarce evidence on marketing policy interventions was inconclusive; interventions targeting drink driving showed beneficial effects. The available evidence suggests that alcohol control policies are largely effective in LMICs. Further regular and statutory enforcement of these interventions is likely to improve their effectiveness.
全球范围内,酒精消费给公共卫生带来了重大挑战,低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)承受着与酒精相关危害的沉重负担。然而,在LMICs中控制酒精消费的干预措施的有效性仍未得到充分研究。本文旨在调查LMICs中采用的酒精监管干预措施的有效性。2024年8月10日,对MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、PsycINFO和科学网进行了系统检索。检索策略包括与监管干预措施及其对酒精消费、健康和其他相关结果的影响相关的术语。使用美国国立卫生研究院、Cochrane有效实践与护理组织清单、ISPOR-SDMD清单和CASP质量评估工具评估偏倚风险,并进行叙述性综合以总结综述结果。在筛选的169篇全文中,本综述纳入了62项研究。大多数研究在中高收入国家进行(n = 48,77%),7项来自中低收入国家,1项来自低收入国家,其他为上述国家的组合。纳入研究的60%质量良好。在世界卫生组织酒精政策领域方面,18项研究关注限制酒精的实际可获得性,11项关注定价,1项关注营销,21项关注酒后驾驶,11项关注所有政策领域的组合。26项研究报告了与酒精消费相关的结果,25项和14项研究分别报告了健康和其他结果。对酒精实际可获得性的限制在所有结果方面大多有效,而定价政策领域在减少酒精消费方面始终显示出有效性。关于营销政策干预的证据稀少且尚无定论;针对酒后驾驶的干预措施显示出有益效果。现有证据表明,酒精控制政策在LMICs中大多有效。进一步定期和法定执行这些干预措施可能会提高其有效性。