• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同城市化阶段生态环境质量的演变及驱动机制

Evolution and driving mechanisms of eco-environmental quality across different urbanization stages.

作者信息

He Zhenfang, Guo Qingchun, Yin Zhaoxin, Luo XinPing, Sun Miaomiao

机构信息

School of Geography and Environment, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng, 252000, People's Republic of China.

Institute of Huanghe Studies, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng, 252000, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):22101. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06084-9.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-06084-9
PMID:40593086
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12216039/
Abstract

Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei, Shandong, and Henan (BTHSH) represent a major urban and economic hub in China, with significant implications for environmental protection. This study utilizes the remote sensing ecological index (RSEI) derived from Landsat imagery, with data spanning from 1985 to 2020 at five-year intervals, to evaluate spatiotemporal variations in eco-environmental quality across different phases of urbanization. The Geographical Detector, integrating natural, socio-economic, and nighttime light data, was used to analyze the driving factors and their interactions. Results indicate a general decline in areas with moderate to excellent eco-environment quality, from 90.44% in 1985 to 83.06% in 2020. Urbanization and socio-economic factors have increasingly influenced environmental degradation, particularly in coastal cities. The spatial distribution of eco-environmental quality became more directional after 2011, with a marked decrease in spatial autocorrelation. The predicted improvement regions in eco-environmental quality, based on the combination of the Theil-Sen and Hurst index methods, corresponds to an area percentage of 16.48% in Beijing, 12.6% in Tianjin, 13.08% in Shandong, 22.09% in Hebei, and 23.93% in Henan, respectively. During the rapid urbanization phase (1985-2010), the primary drivers of eco-environmental quality evolution were natural factors. However, in the quality development phase (2010-2020), the interaction between natural factors and socio-economic factors increasingly influenced eco-environmental quality. Identifying the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of eco-environmental quality distribution and its driving factors across different stages of urbanization is of significant theoretical and practical importance for enhancing the ability of urban ecosystems to respond to urbanization risks and achieve sustainable development.

摘要

北京、天津、河北、山东和河南(BTHSH)是中国主要的城市和经济中心,对环境保护具有重大影响。本研究利用从Landsat影像中提取的遥感生态指数(RSEI),数据跨度为1985年至2020年,间隔为五年,以评估城市化不同阶段生态环境质量的时空变化。运用地理探测器,结合自然、社会经济和夜间灯光数据,分析驱动因素及其相互作用。结果表明,生态环境质量中等至优良的区域总体呈下降趋势,从1985年的90.44%降至2020年的83.06%。城市化和社会经济因素对环境退化的影响日益增大,尤其是在沿海城市。2011年后,生态环境质量的空间分布变得更具方向性,空间自相关性显著降低。基于Theil-Sen和Hurst指数方法相结合预测的生态环境质量改善区域,在北京、天津、山东、河北和河南的面积占比分别为16.48%、12.6%、13.08%、22.09%和23.93%。在快速城市化阶段(1985 - 2010年),生态环境质量演变的主要驱动因素是自然因素。然而,在质量发展阶段(2010 - 2020年),自然因素与社会经济因素之间的相互作用对生态环境质量的影响日益增大。识别城市化不同阶段生态环境质量分布的时空异质性及其驱动因素,对于增强城市生态系统应对城市化风险的能力和实现可持续发展具有重要的理论和实践意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a85f/12216039/a5653ad41b62/41598_2025_6084_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a85f/12216039/f9496e7615f8/41598_2025_6084_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a85f/12216039/5d6cc15e317d/41598_2025_6084_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a85f/12216039/b84eef856b23/41598_2025_6084_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a85f/12216039/4f20baed5357/41598_2025_6084_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a85f/12216039/5add3e778a9d/41598_2025_6084_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a85f/12216039/e58454feb134/41598_2025_6084_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a85f/12216039/97f9a6f44488/41598_2025_6084_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a85f/12216039/7bdef4de3cbd/41598_2025_6084_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a85f/12216039/400f7fd5041b/41598_2025_6084_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a85f/12216039/19b57e840534/41598_2025_6084_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a85f/12216039/674401761c21/41598_2025_6084_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a85f/12216039/e3610aa5c6f9/41598_2025_6084_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a85f/12216039/db51f55d78d2/41598_2025_6084_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a85f/12216039/a5653ad41b62/41598_2025_6084_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a85f/12216039/f9496e7615f8/41598_2025_6084_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a85f/12216039/5d6cc15e317d/41598_2025_6084_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a85f/12216039/b84eef856b23/41598_2025_6084_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a85f/12216039/4f20baed5357/41598_2025_6084_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a85f/12216039/5add3e778a9d/41598_2025_6084_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a85f/12216039/e58454feb134/41598_2025_6084_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a85f/12216039/97f9a6f44488/41598_2025_6084_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a85f/12216039/7bdef4de3cbd/41598_2025_6084_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a85f/12216039/400f7fd5041b/41598_2025_6084_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a85f/12216039/19b57e840534/41598_2025_6084_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a85f/12216039/674401761c21/41598_2025_6084_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a85f/12216039/e3610aa5c6f9/41598_2025_6084_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a85f/12216039/db51f55d78d2/41598_2025_6084_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a85f/12216039/a5653ad41b62/41598_2025_6084_Fig14_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evolution and driving mechanisms of eco-environmental quality across different urbanization stages.不同城市化阶段生态环境质量的演变及驱动机制
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):22101. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06084-9.
2
[Nonlinear Relationship Between Multidimensional Urbanization and Carbon Emissions and Its Driving Mechanisms].多维城市化与碳排放之间的非线性关系及其驱动机制
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2025 Jun 8;46(6):3524-3535. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202311060.
3
[Evolution of Urban Expansion Pattern and Its Impact on the Quality of the Ecological Environment in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglomeration].京津冀城市群城市扩张格局演变及其对生态环境质量的影响
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2025 Jun 8;46(6):3708-3719. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202409036.
4
[Remote Sensing Evaluation of Ecological Environment Quality in Gansu Province and Quantitative Identification of Its Driving Factors].甘肃省生态环境质量的遥感评价及其驱动因素的定量识别
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2025 Jun 8;46(6):3730-3746. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202406186.
5
[Spatial-temporal Differentiation Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Cultivated Land NPP in Major Grain Producing Areas (Henan Province)].[主要粮食产区(河南省)耕地净初级生产力的时空分异特征及影响因素]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2025 Jun 8;46(6):3632-3644. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202406053.
6
[Analysis on Spatial-temporal Evolution and Driving Forces of Ecological Environment Quality in Different Frozen Ground Regions of the Three-River Headwater Region].[三江源地区不同冻土区生态环境质量时空演变及驱动力分析]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2025 Jun 8;46(6):3747-3759. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202406184.
7
[Spatio-temporal Dynamic and Driving Factor Analysis of Ecological Environment Quality in Qinling Mountains].秦岭生态环境质量时空动态及驱动因素分析
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2025 Jun 8;46(6):3720-3729. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202404223.
8
[Spatial and Temporal Variability of Carbon Sequestration Capacity of Vegetation in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei and Its Influencing Factors from 2002 to 2020].[2002—2020年京津冀植被碳汇能力的时空变化及其影响因素]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2025 Jun 8;46(6):3784-3796. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202405284.
9
[Analysis of Urban Vegetation Changes and Drivers in City of Plateau River Valleys].[高原河谷城市植被变化及其驱动因素分析]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2025 Jun 8;46(6):3645-3655. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202401244.
10
Spatiotemporal evolution and driving forces of landscape ecological risk in the lower reaches of the Yellow River from 2000 to 2020.2000—2020年黄河下游景观生态风险的时空演变及驱动因素
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21375. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-05724-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Author Correction: Glycometabolism change during Burkholderia pseudomallei infection in RAW264.7 cells by proteomic analysis.作者更正:通过蛋白质组学分析研究RAW264.7细胞在伯克霍尔德菌感染期间的糖代谢变化。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jun 26;15(1):20315. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-05634-5.
2
Assessing the effectiveness of long short-term memory and artificial neural network in predicting daily ozone concentrations in Liaocheng City.评估长短期记忆网络和人工神经网络在预测聊城市每日臭氧浓度方面的有效性。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 25;15(1):6798. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91329-w.
3
Assessment and simulation of eco-environmental quality changes in rapid rural urbanization: Xiong'an New Area, China.
快速乡村城镇化过程中生态环境质量变化的评估与模拟:中国雄安新区
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 4;14(1):23075. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73487-5.
4
Evaluation of ecosystem quality and stability based on key indicators and ideal reference frame: A case study of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau.基于关键指标和理想参照框架的生态系统质量和稳定性评价:以青藏高原为例。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Nov;370:122460. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122460. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
5
The evolution of habitat quality and its response to land use change in the coastal China, 1985-2020.1985 - 2020年中国沿海地区栖息地质量的演变及其对土地利用变化的响应
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Nov 20;952:175930. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175930. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
6
Monthly climate prediction using deep convolutional neural network and long short-term memory.使用深度卷积神经网络和长短期记忆进行月度气候预测。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 31;14(1):17748. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68906-6.
7
Ecosystem health assessment of East Kolkata Wetlands, India: Implications for environmental sustainability.印度东加尔各答湿地的生态系统健康评估:对环境可持续性的启示。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Aug;366:121809. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121809. Epub 2024 Jul 14.
8
Coupling eco-environmental quality and ecosystem services to delineate priority ecological reserves-A case study in the Yellow River Basin.耦合生态环境质量与生态系统服务以划定优先生态保护区——以黄河流域为例
J Environ Manage. 2024 Aug;365:121645. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121645. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
9
Synergizing remote sensing and ecological indicators (RSEIs) for evaluating ecological environmental quality (EEQ) in Asansol Municipal Corporation: an integrated approach.利用遥感和生态指标协同评估印度阿斯索尔市的生态环境质量(EEQ):一种综合方法。
Environ Monit Assess. 2024 Jun 19;196(7):631. doi: 10.1007/s10661-024-12793-x.
10
Application of a novel remote sensing ecological index (RSEI) based on geographically weighted principal component analysis for assessing the land surface ecological quality.基于地理加权主成分分析的新型遥感生态指数(RSEI)在评估土地表面生态质量中的应用。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 May;31(22):32350-32370. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-33330-w. Epub 2024 Apr 23.