• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

驾驶理论考试中长期知识保持的预测因素。

Predictors of long-term knowledge retention in the driver theory test.

作者信息

Stefan David A, Heikoop Daniël D, de Winter Joost C F, Houwing Sjoerd

机构信息

Research & Development, Centraal Bureau Rijvaardigheidsbewijzen (CBR), Rijswijk, The Netherlands.

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):20948. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-04796-6.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-04796-6
PMID:40593944
Abstract

To obtain a driver's licence, one must successfully complete a practical driving test and a theory test. Although the theory test is widely regarded as an important element of driving competence, little is known about the predictors of theory test performance, and in particular the extent to which the acquired knowledge is retained over the years. All individuals who passed a car theory test in the Netherlands between November 2019 and October 2023 were invited to complete a questionnaire, which included a retention test (i.e., a representative retake test) consisting of 20 items not used before. The results based on 50,857 respondents revealed that those with a lower level of education exhibited lower performance on the retention test. Moreover, respondents who took a course with an instructor, an approach mostly used by those with a lower level of education, had a relatively high likelihood of passing the official car theory test on the first attempt. It was also found that the extent to which knowledge increased or decreased over the years was item-dependent, a pattern possibly explained by whether the test item measures functionally relevant driving experiences or if it primarily assesses isolated rules. The results of this study are relevant for training institutes and policymakers.

摘要

要获得驾驶执照,必须成功通过实际驾驶考试和理论考试。尽管理论考试被广泛认为是驾驶能力的一个重要组成部分,但对于理论考试成绩的预测因素,尤其是所获得的知识在多年间的保留程度,人们知之甚少。所有在2019年11月至2023年10月期间在荷兰通过汽车理论考试的人都被邀请填写一份问卷,其中包括一个由20个以前未使用过的项目组成的保留测试(即代表性的补考测试)。基于50857名受访者的结果显示,受教育程度较低的人在保留测试中的表现较差。此外,参加由教练授课课程的受访者(这种方式大多为受教育程度较低的人所采用)首次通过官方汽车理论考试的可能性相对较高。研究还发现,多年来知识增加或减少的程度因项目而异,这种模式可能可以通过测试项目是衡量功能相关的驾驶经验还是主要评估孤立的规则来解释。这项研究的结果对培训机构和政策制定者具有参考价值。

相似文献

1
Predictors of long-term knowledge retention in the driver theory test.驾驶理论考试中长期知识保持的预测因素。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):20948. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-04796-6.
2
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
4
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
5
Diagnostic test accuracy and cost-effectiveness of tests for codeletion of chromosomal arms 1p and 19q in people with glioma.染色体臂 1p 和 19q 缺失的检测在胶质瘤患者中的诊断准确性和成本效益。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 2;3(3):CD013387. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013387.pub2.
6
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
7
Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery.原发性手术后晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者残留病灶对生存预后的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 26;9(9):CD015048. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015048.pub2.
8
Interventions for preventing abuse in the elderly.预防老年人受虐待的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 16;2016(8):CD010321. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010321.pub2.
9
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
10
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.

本文引用的文献

1
What happens when drivers face hazards on the road?当司机在路上遇到危险时会发生什么?
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Jun;91:43-54. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.02.013. Epub 2016 Mar 5.
2
Replication and Analysis of Ebbinghaus' Forgetting Curve.艾宾浩斯遗忘曲线的复制与分析。
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 6;10(7):e0120644. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120644. eCollection 2015.
3
Decay happens: the role of active forgetting in memory.衰退还在继续:主动遗忘在记忆中的作用。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2013 Mar;17(3):111-20. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.01.001. Epub 2013 Jan 29.
4
Predicting self-reported violations among novice license drivers using pre-license simulator measures.使用驾驶模拟机测试预测新手驾驶员自述违规行为。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Mar;52:71-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.12.018. Epub 2013 Jan 6.
5
Resitting a high-stakes postgraduate medical examination on multiple occasions: nonlinear multilevel modelling of performance in the MRCP(UK) examinations.多次重考高风险研究生医学考试:MRCP(UK)考试表现的非线性多层级建模。
BMC Med. 2012 Jun 14;10:60. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-60.
6
Working memory: theories, models, and controversies.工作记忆:理论、模型与争议
Annu Rev Psychol. 2012;63:1-29. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100422. Epub 2011 Sep 27.
7
The development and validation of two complementary measures of drivers' hazard perception ability.开发和验证两种互补的驾驶员危险感知能力测量方法。
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Jul;42(4):1232-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.01.017. Epub 2010 Feb 24.
8
Spacing effects in learning: a temporal ridgeline of optimal retention.学习中的间隔效应:最佳记忆的时间脊线
Psychol Sci. 2008 Nov;19(11):1095-102. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02209.x.
9
Relationships between driving simulator performance and driving test results.驾驶模拟器性能与驾驶测试结果之间的关系。
Ergonomics. 2009 Feb;52(2):137-53. doi: 10.1080/00140130802277521.
10
Gender differences in driver's license theory test scores in the Netherlands.荷兰驾照理论考试成绩中的性别差异。
J Safety Res. 2008;39(4):413-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2008.05.007. Epub 2008 Aug 9.