• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于非麻醉医生镇静下ERCP术中血氧饱和度降低发生率及内镜医师不良事件知晓情况的前瞻性研究。

A prospective study on incidence of desaturations in ERCP with non-anesthesiologist sedation and adverse event awareness of endoscopists.

作者信息

Prosenz Julian, Lang René-Pascal, Bernhofer Sebastian, Maieron Andreas

机构信息

GI Endoscopy Quality Matters Working Group (GIEQM), Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Dr. Karl-Dorrek-Straße 30, 3500, Krems, Austria.

Department of Internal Medicine 2, Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Hospital St, Dunant-Platz 1, 3100, PöltenSt. Pölten, Austria.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):22781. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-04922-4.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-04922-4
PMID:40594061
Abstract

Little is known of the desaturation rate among NAPS (non-anesthesiological/nurse-administered propofol-sedation) ERCPs (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography) and endoscopists awareness of overall incidence of adverse events (AEs). The primary aims were to assess desaturation rates and endoscopists AE-awareness. In this prospective observation study, all ERCPs performed in a certain period were included. Nurses documented hypoxemia and measures taken to correct it. Charts were reviewed for clinical data. Definitions of AEs were based on the 2020 ESGE guidelines. Of 232 included ERCPs, 218 (94%) were conducted using NAPS. Mean age was 67.9 (SD 15.8) years, 53.2% were female, median ASA status was 2 (IQR 2;3). Most (86.8%) procedures were started on 2 L O2 flow/min (via nasal cannula), propofol mono-sedation was used in 98.2%. A desaturation occurred in 22.6% (n = 45) of procedures, and 28.1% (n = 56), when including interventions performed for hypoxemia. Risk factors for desaturations were higher BMI, and higher ASA status (p < 0.05). Documentation of AEs by endoscopists was exceptionally low. Only 22.2% of post-ERCP pancreatitis, 19% of intraprocedural bleeding, 20% of desaturations were officially recorded/documented. All-cause 30-day mortality was significantly higher in the desaturation group (10.7% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.03). Sedation-AEs are common and desaturation is statistically significantly associated with 30-day-mortality. Incidence of complications is underappreciated by endoscopists.

摘要

关于非麻醉科/护士实施丙泊酚镇静的内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(NAPS-ERCP)中的血氧饱和度下降率以及内镜医师对不良事件(AE)总体发生率的认知情况,目前所知甚少。主要目的是评估血氧饱和度下降率以及内镜医师对不良事件的认知。在这项前瞻性观察研究中,纳入了某一时期内进行的所有ERCP手术。护士记录低氧血症情况以及为纠正低氧血症所采取的措施。查阅病历以获取临床数据。不良事件的定义基于2020年欧洲消化内镜学会(ESGE)指南。在纳入的232例ERCP手术中,218例(94%)采用了NAPS。平均年龄为67.9(标准差15.8)岁,53.2%为女性,美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)状态中位数为2(四分位间距2;3)。大多数(86.8%)手术开始时采用2升/分钟的氧气流量(通过鼻导管),98.2%使用丙泊酚单一镇静剂。22.6%(n = 45)的手术出现了血氧饱和度下降,若包括针对低氧血症采取的干预措施,则为28.1%(n = 56)。血氧饱和度下降的风险因素包括较高的体重指数(BMI)和较高的ASA状态(p < 0.05)。内镜医师对不良事件的记录极低。ERCP术后胰腺炎只有22.2%、术中出血19%、血氧饱和度下降20%得到正式记录/存档。血氧饱和度下降组全因30天死亡率显著更高(10.7%对2.8%,p = 0.03)。镇静相关不良事件很常见,血氧饱和度下降与30天死亡率在统计学上有显著关联。内镜医师对并发症发生率的认识不足。

相似文献

1
A prospective study on incidence of desaturations in ERCP with non-anesthesiologist sedation and adverse event awareness of endoscopists.一项关于非麻醉医生镇静下ERCP术中血氧饱和度降低发生率及内镜医师不良事件知晓情况的前瞻性研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):22781. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-04922-4.
2
Sedative techniques for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的镇静技术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13(6):CD007274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007274.pub2.
3
Patient-Controlled Sedation Versus Clinician-Administered Sedation for Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Systematic Review.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术中患者自控镇静与临床医生实施镇静的系统评价
Anesth Analg. 2022 Apr 1;134(4):765-772. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005766.
4
Sedoanalgesia with dexmedetomidine in daily anesthesia practices: a prospective randomized controlled trial.右美托咪定用于日常麻醉实践中的清醒镇痛:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Jan 29;25(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-02918-1.
5
Similar Risk of Cardiopulmonary Adverse Events Between Propofol and Traditional Anesthesia for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.丙泊酚与传统麻醉在胃肠镜检查中心血管不良事件风险相似:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Feb;15(2):194-206. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.07.013. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
6
Chloral hydrate as a sedating agent for neurodiagnostic procedures in children.水合氯醛作为儿童神经诊断程序中的镇静剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 3;11(11):CD011786. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011786.pub2.
7
Dexmedetomidine- or Clonidine-Based Sedation Compared With Propofol in Critically Ill Patients: The A2B Randomized Clinical Trial.危重症患者中右美托咪定或可乐定镇静与丙泊酚镇静的比较:A2B随机临床试验
JAMA. 2025 May 19. doi: 10.1001/jama.2025.7200.
8
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
9
Chloral hydrate as a sedating agent for neurodiagnostic procedures in children.水合氯醛作为镇静剂在儿科神经诊断中的应用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 16;8(8):CD011786. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011786.pub3.
10
Early routine endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography strategy versus early conservative management strategy in acute gallstone pancreatitis.急性胆石性胰腺炎的早期常规内镜逆行胰胆管造影术策略与早期保守治疗策略比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 May 16;2012(5):CD009779. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009779.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
New Trends in Airway Management During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Narrative Review.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术中气道管理的新趋势:一项叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 21;14(16):5905. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165905.

本文引用的文献

1
Curriculum for diagnostic endoscopic ultrasound training in Europe: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement.欧洲诊断性内镜超声培训课程:欧洲胃肠道内镜学会(ESGE)立场声明。
Endoscopy. 2024 Mar;56(3):222-240. doi: 10.1055/a-2224-8704. Epub 2023 Dec 8.
2
[Not Available].[不可用]。
Z Gastroenterol. 2023 Sep;61(9):1246-1301. doi: 10.1055/a-2124-5333. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
3
The Awareness and Experience About Endoscopic Adverse Events Among South Korean Endoscopists.韩国内镜医师对内镜不良事件的认知和体验。
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2023 Sep;34(9):932-942. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2023.22256.
4
JAG consensus statements for training and certification in colonoscopy.结肠镜检查培训与认证的JAG共识声明。
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2023 Jan 27;14(3):201-221. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2022-102260. eCollection 2023.
5
Novel classification for adverse events in GI endoscopy: the AGREE classification.胃肠道内镜不良事件的新分类:AGREE 分类。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Jun;95(6):1078-1085.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.11.038. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
6
The under-recognised effects of serious endoscopic complications on practitioners.严重内镜并发症对从业者未得到充分认识的影响。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Dec;6(12):978-980. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00341-1.
7
Curriculum for ERCP and endoscopic ultrasound training in Europe: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement.欧洲内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)和内镜超声检查培训课程:欧洲胃肠内镜学会(ESGE)立场声明
Endoscopy. 2021 Oct;53(10):1071-1087. doi: 10.1055/a-1537-8999. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
8
Overcoming the barriers to dissemination and implementation of quality measures for gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and United European Gastroenterology (UEG) position statement.克服胃肠道内镜质量措施传播和实施的障碍:欧洲胃肠道内镜学会(ESGE)和联合欧洲胃肠病学(UEG)立场声明。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2021 Feb;9(1):120-126. doi: 10.1177/2050640620981366. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
9
Outcomes after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with general anaesthesia versus sedation.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术全身麻醉与镇静的结果。
Br J Anaesth. 2021 Jan;126(1):191-200. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.08.057. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
10
ERCP-related adverse events: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline.内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)相关不良事件:欧洲胃肠道内镜学会(ESGE)指南。
Endoscopy. 2020 Feb;52(2):127-149. doi: 10.1055/a-1075-4080. Epub 2019 Dec 20.