• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医护人员对老年人痴呆症评估的态度。

Healthcare workers' attitudes regarding the assessment of dementia in the elderly.

作者信息

Živanović Srđan, Pavlović Jelena, Hadživuković Natalija, Perkhofer Susanne, Podgorica Nertila

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, University of East Sarajevo, Studentska 5, Foca, 73300, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Health University of Applied Sciences Tyrol, Innsbruck, Austria.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):845. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12958-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-025-12958-5
PMID:40598249
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12211515/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dementia is a growing public health problem, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH), as a post-conflict LMIC with a complex administrative structure, currently lacks national guidelines, epidemiological data, and systematic approaches for dementia care. This study investigates healthcare workers’ attitudes toward dementia care and identifies both obstacles and practical opportunities for improving practice within BiH’s unique healthcare system.

METHODS

A qualitative cross-sectional study was conducted in primary healthcare settings across Bosnia and Herzegovina, with 25 participants, including family medicine doctors ( = 10), nurses ( = 10), and psychologists ( = 5). The data were analyzed using thematic analysis guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).

RESULTS

Dementia care in BiH is predominantly reactive, with healthcare professionals typically responding only after families have expressed concerns. Participants reported inconsistent use of cognitive screening tools (e.g. MMSE, MoCA), largely due to insufficient training, lack of clear national guidelines, and varying institutional practices. Many clinicians felt unprepared and unsupported in managing dementia cases. Cultural stigma and widespread misperceptions of dementia as a normal part of aging contribute to delays in diagnosis and reduce the likelihood that families will seek help early. These barriers are exacerbated by a lack of national prevalence data and fragmented care pathways.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study indicate the need to change the approach to dementia care in BiH through concrete and realistic measures within the existing systemic frameworks. Practice-based guidelines, culturally adapted tools for early detection, reactivation of community-based care, accessible education, a pragmatic approach to prevention, and local initiatives for awareness-raising and multidisciplinary care are recommended.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-025-12958-5.

摘要

背景

痴呆症是一个日益严重的公共卫生问题,在低收入和中等收入国家尤为如此。波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那(波黑)作为一个冲突后低收入和中等收入国家,行政结构复杂,目前缺乏关于痴呆症护理的国家指南、流行病学数据和系统方法。本研究调查了医护人员对痴呆症护理的态度,并确定了在波黑独特的医疗系统中改善实践的障碍和实际机会。

方法

在波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那的基层医疗环境中进行了一项定性横断面研究,有25名参与者,包括家庭医生(10名)、护士(10名)和心理学家(5名)。数据采用基于实施研究综合框架(CFIR)指导的主题分析进行分析。

结果

波黑的痴呆症护理主要是被动反应式的,医护人员通常只在家庭表达担忧后才做出回应。参与者报告认知筛查工具(如MMSE、MoCA)的使用不一致,主要原因是培训不足、缺乏明确的国家指南以及机构做法各异。许多临床医生在管理痴呆症病例时感到没有准备且缺乏支持。文化污名以及将痴呆症普遍误解为衰老的正常部分导致诊断延迟,并降低了家庭早期寻求帮助的可能性。缺乏国家患病率数据和护理途径碎片化加剧了这些障碍。

结论

本研究结果表明,需要通过现有系统框架内具体且切实可行的措施来改变波黑的痴呆症护理方法。建议制定基于实践的指南、文化适应性强的早期检测工具、恢复社区护理、提供可及的教育、务实的预防方法以及提高认识和多学科护理的地方倡议。

补充信息

在线版本包含可在10.1186/s12913-025-12958-5获取的补充材料。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07be/12211515/776b8ffaad64/12913_2025_12958_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07be/12211515/776b8ffaad64/12913_2025_12958_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07be/12211515/776b8ffaad64/12913_2025_12958_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Healthcare workers' attitudes regarding the assessment of dementia in the elderly.医护人员对老年人痴呆症评估的态度。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):845. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12958-5.
2
Understanding preconception care: a scoping review of knowledge, attitudes and practices among reproductive age individuals, healthcare workers and stakeholders in low- and middle-income countries.了解孕前保健:对低收入和中等收入国家育龄人群、医护人员及利益相关者的知识、态度和行为的范围综述
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 27;15(6):e099143. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099143.
3
The intersection of culture in the provision of dementia care: A systematic review.痴呆症护理中文化的交叉点:系统评价。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Sep;27(17-18):3241-3253. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13999. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
4
Exploring healthcare workers' perceptions and experiences regarding post-traumatic stress disorder after 2 years of the last global pandemic.探究在最后一次全球大流行两年后医护人员对创伤后应激障碍的看法和经历。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):861. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13004-0.
5
Improving adherence to Standard Precautions for the control of health care-associated infections.提高对标准预防措施的依从性以控制医疗保健相关感染。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 26;2(2):CD010768. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010768.pub2.
6
Public stewardship of private for-profit healthcare providers in low- and middle-income countries.低收入和中等收入国家对私营营利性医疗服务提供者的公共管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 11;2016(8):CD009855. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009855.pub2.
7
First detection of in golden jackals () in Bosnia and Herzegovina.在波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那的金豺()中首次检测到。
Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2025 Jun 11;27:101099. doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2025.101099. eCollection 2025 Aug.
8
Social workers' involvement in advance care planning: a systematic narrative review.社会工作者参与预先护理计划:系统叙述性综述。
BMC Palliat Care. 2017 Jul 10;17(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12904-017-0218-8.
9
Effectiveness of interventions for dementia in low- and middle-income countries: protocol for a systematic review, pairwise and network meta-analysis.干预措施在中低收入国家治疗痴呆的效果:系统评价、成对比较和网络荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 19;9(6):e027851. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027851.
10
Health system-related barriers to prenatal care management in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of the qualitative literature.中低收入国家产前保健管理中与卫生系统相关的障碍:定性文献的系统评价。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2023 Feb 27;24:e15. doi: 10.1017/S1463423622000706.

本文引用的文献

1
Identifying Gaps and Barriers in Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia Research and Management in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Survey of Health Professionals and Researchers.识别中低收入国家阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症研究和管理中的差距和障碍:对卫生专业人员和研究人员的调查。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2024;101(4):1307-1320. doi: 10.3233/JAD-240650.
2
Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2024 report of the Lancet standing Commission.《痴呆症的预防、干预与照护:柳叶刀常设委员会2024年报告》
Lancet. 2024 Aug 10;404(10452):572-628. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01296-0. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
3
Giving voice to the voiceless: Understanding the perceived needs of dementia family carers in Soweto, a South African township.
为无声者发声:了解南非乡镇索韦托痴呆症家庭护理者的感知需求。
Dementia (London). 2024 May;23(4):622-642. doi: 10.1177/14713012241234155. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
4
Dementia in South Africa: A Situational Analysis.南非的痴呆症:现状分析
Dementia (London). 2024 Apr;23(3):452-475. doi: 10.1177/14713012231183358. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
5
Delay in the diagnosis of dementia in urban India: Role of dementia subtype and age at onset.印度城市痴呆诊断延迟:痴呆亚型和发病年龄的作用。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2022 Dec;37(12). doi: 10.1002/gps.5843.
6
Facilitators and Barriers to Dementia Assessment and Diagnosis: Perspectives From Dementia Experts Within a Global Health Context.痴呆症评估与诊断的促进因素和障碍:全球健康背景下痴呆症专家的观点
Front Neurol. 2022 Mar 28;13:769360. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.769360. eCollection 2022.
7
The economic burden of dementia in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs): a systematic review.中低收入国家(LMICs)痴呆症的经济负担:系统评价。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Apr;7(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007409.
8
Antifragility of healthcare systems in Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina: Learning from man-made and natural crises.克罗地亚和波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那医疗系统的反脆弱性:从人为和自然危机中学习。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021 Oct 7;9:100216. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100216. eCollection 2021 Oct.
9
Serbia: Health System Review.塞尔维亚:卫生系统评估
Health Syst Transit. 2019 Oct;21(3):1-211.
10
Twenty-five years on: revisiting Bosnia and Herzegovina after implementation of a family medicine development program.二十五年后:家庭医学发展项目实施后回访波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Jan 13;21(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-1079-4.