• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

瘢痕疙瘩手术可及性方面的健康不平等:对英格兰各地资助标准及其影响的分析。

Health inequalities in access to keloid scar surgery: An analysis of funding criteria and their impact across England.

作者信息

Richardson Hermione, Basnet Sunima, Rad Deniz, Vijayan Roshan

机构信息

University of Cambridge, School of Clinical Medicine, United Kingdom.

East & North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, Lister Hospital, Coreys Mill Lane, Stevenage SG1 4AB, United Kingdom.

出版信息

JPRAS Open. 2025 May 6;45:136-147. doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2025.04.014. eCollection 2025 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpra.2025.04.014
PMID:40599393
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12212168/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Keloid scars, which are significantly more common in ethnic minorities, are challenging to treat in England because of funding policies. Overly restrictive funding criteria can have a disproportionate adverse effect on those most prone to keloid, resulting in health inequality.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study investigated the regional variations in funding criteria for keloid scar surgery across the 42 integrated care boards (ICBs) of England and, through Freedom of Information requests, the number of corresponding applications and approvals in 2023. Potential associations with the Black, Asian and minority ethnic composition of ICB populations were explored.

RESULTS

Funding criteria were highly restrictive across all ICBs. Keloid scar surgery applications were almost universally low, with some ICBs reporting <5 or no applications. Acceptance rates were generally low. There was no significant overall correlation between the ethnic proportion of ICBs' populations and number of applications or approval rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings confirmed that access to keloid surgery is highly restricted nationwide, a situation that likely disproportionately disadvantages the ethnic minorities. The near total lack of ethnicity data collection by ICBs obstructs the full characterisation of this issue. We propose exempting keloids from funding restrictions or at least revising the criteria to account for their symptomatic and psychosocial impact, to help achieve more equitable healthcare policies.

摘要

背景

瘢痕疙瘩在少数民族中更为常见,由于资金政策,在英国治疗具有挑战性。过于严格的资金标准可能会对最易患瘢痕疙瘩的人群产生不成比例的不利影响,导致健康不平等。

方法

这项横断面研究调查了英格兰42个综合护理委员会(ICB)中瘢痕疙瘩手术资金标准的区域差异,并通过信息自由请求,了解了2023年相应申请和批准的数量。探讨了与ICB人群中黑人、亚洲人和少数族裔构成的潜在关联。

结果

所有ICB的资金标准都非常严格。瘢痕疙瘩手术申请几乎普遍较少,一些ICB报告的申请数少于5例或没有申请。接受率普遍较低。ICB人群的种族比例与申请数量或批准率之间没有显著的总体相关性。

结论

我们的研究结果证实,全国范围内瘢痕疙瘩手术的可及性受到高度限制,这种情况可能会对少数民族造成不成比例的不利影响。ICB几乎完全缺乏种族数据收集,这妨碍了对该问题的全面描述。我们建议免除瘢痕疙瘩的资金限制,或至少修订标准以考虑其症状和心理社会影响,以帮助实现更公平的医疗政策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b84/12212168/fede4b1bca09/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b84/12212168/5f2b7fd3c270/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b84/12212168/5d1d090d36f5/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b84/12212168/b7c93011b70e/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b84/12212168/dc9f7a210c44/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b84/12212168/c0bc9b605ae7/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b84/12212168/fede4b1bca09/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b84/12212168/5f2b7fd3c270/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b84/12212168/5d1d090d36f5/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b84/12212168/b7c93011b70e/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b84/12212168/dc9f7a210c44/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b84/12212168/c0bc9b605ae7/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b84/12212168/fede4b1bca09/gr6.jpg

相似文献

1
Health inequalities in access to keloid scar surgery: An analysis of funding criteria and their impact across England.瘢痕疙瘩手术可及性方面的健康不平等:对英格兰各地资助标准及其影响的分析。
JPRAS Open. 2025 May 6;45:136-147. doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2025.04.014. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Silicone gel sheeting for treating keloid scars.硅凝胶片治疗瘢痕疙瘩。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 3;1(1):CD013878. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013878.pub2.
3
Laser therapy for treating hypertrophic and keloid scars.激光疗法治疗增生性瘢痕和瘢痕疙瘩。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 26;9(9):CD011642. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011642.pub2.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
5
Racial and Ethnic Minorities Underrepresented in Pain Management Guidelines for Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis.在全膝关节置换术疼痛管理指南中代表性不足的少数族裔:一项荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1698-1706. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003026. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
6
Interventions for acne scars.痤疮瘢痕的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 3;4(4):CD011946. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011946.pub2.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
8
The quantity, quality and findings of network meta-analyses evaluating the effectiveness of GLP-1 RAs for weight loss: a scoping review.评估胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)减肥效果的网状Meta分析的数量、质量及结果:一项范围综述
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jun 25:1-73. doi: 10.3310/SKHT8119.
9
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.电子烟戒烟。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 17;11(11):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub7.
10
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.电子烟戒烟。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 14;9(9):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub6.

本文引用的文献

1
Scar Perception: A Comparison of African American and White Self-identified Patients.疤痕认知:非裔美国人和自我认定为白人的患者的比较。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 May 23;10(5):e4345. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004345. eCollection 2022 May.
2
Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on utilisation of healthcare services: a systematic review.2019冠状病毒病大流行对医疗服务利用的影响:一项系统评价
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 16;11(3):e045343. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045343.
3
Epidemiology and clinical features of keloids in Black Africans: a nested case-control study from Yaoundé, Cameroon.
黑非洲人瘢痕疙瘩的流行病学和临床特征:来自喀麦隆雅温得的巢式病例对照研究。
Int J Dermatol. 2019 Oct;58(10):1135-1140. doi: 10.1111/ijd.14610. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
4
International variations in primary care physician consultation time: a systematic review of 67 countries.初级保健医生会诊时间的国际差异:对67个国家的系统评价
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 8;7(10):e017902. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017902.
5
A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Triamcinolone and Radiation Therapy for Ear Keloids after Surgical Excision: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.曲安奈德与放射治疗对手术切除后耳部瘢痕疙瘩疗效的比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Jun;137(6):1718-1725. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002165.
6
Evaluating ear cartilage piercing practices in London, UK.评估英国伦敦的耳部软骨穿刺做法。
J Laryngol Otol. 2014 Jun;128(6):508-11. doi: 10.1017/S0022215114001121. Epub 2014 Jun 9.
7
[Keloid scars on black skin: myth or reality].[黑色皮肤上的瘢痕疙瘩:神话还是现实]
Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2013 Apr;58(2):115-22. doi: 10.1016/j.anplas.2012.02.005. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
8
Projections of the ethnic minority populations of the United Kingdom 2006-2056.2006-2056 年英国少数民族人口预测。
Popul Dev Rev. 2010;36(3):441-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00342.x.
9
[Dermatological experience at the Moroccan mobile field hospital in Brazzaville, Congo].[刚果布拉柴维尔摩洛哥流动野战医院的皮肤科经验]
Med Trop (Mars). 2009 Feb;69(1):13-7.
10
A primary care perspective on keloids.从初级保健角度看瘢痕疙瘩
Medscape J Med. 2009;11(1):18. Epub 2009 Jan 20.